Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joy Lucette Garner's avatar

On another note:

It's in the DENTAL injections! See: https://stewpeters.com/video/2023/05/report-nanotech-found-in-dental-anesthetics-nanotech-found-in-vaxx-also-observed-in-dental-drugs/

Just b/c a person knows to avoid the vax, doesn't mean they will also avoid the dentist. We're going to have many unvaxxed dying with the same problems. BEWARE the dental injections!

Expand full comment
Joy Lucette Garner's avatar

The VAERS under-reporting rate is found in the only study that ever did any meaningful short-term follow up, (and which was never refuted) found here: https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system

This study found that less than 1% of adverse events are ever reported. And we also know that the CDC ordered hospitals to classify people as "unvaccinated" if they had not yet gotten their 2nd jab, or it had been less than 2 weeks since their 2nd jab.

Before covid, we already had less than 1% reporting rate. Does anyone think the rate got better with people who were recently jabbed (showing up at the hospital either dead or dying) being classified as "unvaccinated?" How does one make a VAERS report for any "unvaccinated" person?

The VAERS numbers must be multiplied by AT LEAST 100 times. Realistically, it's probably safe to assume it's 200 times higher with the CDC's covid "adjustments."

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts