World Health Disorganization
Trillions wasted while many in the world starve and live in poverty
Trillions of dollars have been spent on expensive, ineffective and harmful CoVID-19 prevention measures whilst ignoring cheap, effective and beneficial treatments. On top of this useless and deadly response by governments around the world, the environmental impacts have yet to be felt.
An Inconvenient Truth - by Peter Halligan (substack.com)
The upcoming book “War on Ivermectin: The Medicine That Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the Covid Pandemic” by Pierre Kory is due out on 15 Nov 2022 and promises to be a global best seller rivalling “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health” and the lesser-known book “Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth” by Anonymous, strongly advocated by Steve Kirsch.
The far more significant question for humanity in which large parts of the world live close to or in poverty (as defined by living on a few dollars a day) would be this “Is it better to inject deadly and experimental toxins or provide a better lifestyle for the world’s poor?”
So far, deaths with CoVID-19 present are around 6.5 million over the two and a half years or so of the global pandemic. This is an annualized rate of 2.6 million per year. Remember, those that have succumbed had lived a few years LONGER than population life expectancy and had an average of 2-6 other co-morbidities already killing them.
Compare this to the nine million that die of hunger every year and 6.75 million so far this year.
How Many People Die From Hunger Each Year? (theworldcounts.com)
The WHO estimates that 828 million people suffered from malnutrition and hunger in 2021.
UN Report: Global hunger numbers rose to as many as 828 million in 2021 (who.int)
This number is bound to increase this year and next, perhaps by as much as 50%.
The WHO has not declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC, pronounced FAKE) for this humanitarian disaster.
We have all seen the adverts about global suffering such as “800 children die every day from drinking dirty water” (see adverts by the charity WaterAid) or “please help with cleft lips in children” (SmileTrain) or “This child has pneumonia, that child has pneumonia that can be cured with this cheap pill” (UNICEF). There are a myriad of charities, like 501c3’s, with claims like this one:
$25 Charitable Donation For: Feeding A Venezuelan Family For 10 Days (topsalecoach.online)
(All charities must be carefully checked for proof of the percentage of donations that actually go to the needy, or you will have a Clinton Foundation issue on your hands, where the vast majority goes to fund the lifestyles of the “Rich and Famous” rather than to the cause itself).
For me, these guys seem to be the best around:
Who we are - Friends of the Earth International (foei.org)
What is the co-ordinated response from the world’s richest (and most highly indebted) nations and the WHO to this humanitarian crisis? (Whatever happened to the sentiment of Bob Geldorf’s “Feed the World?)
For a bit of context, remember this from global cultists at the WEF?
How billionaire Elon Musk’s fortune could end world hunger | World Economic Forum (weforum.org)
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/11/elon-musk-un-world-hunger-famine/
“The Tesla founder has offered to pay to end world hunger if the UN explains how it would spend his money. Responding to the challenge, the UN's World Food Programme has produced a detailed plan to stave off global famine. The UN’s $6.6 billion proposal could help 42 million vulnerable people survive 2022.”
Let’s assume that a billion people globally are at risk from malnutrition and hunger, rather than the 42 million. That 6.6 billion dollars per 42 million people, works out at around 165 billion dollars a year to solve the problem. As a sense check, referring back to the “topsalecoach”) charities’ claim of 25 bucks to feed a Venezuelan family (of, say, four) for ten days = 25 dollars times 365/10days times a billion people/four in the family, works out at a little under 230 billion dollars a year.
We can split the difference between 165 billion and 230 billion a year and make the statement “it will cost 200 billion dollars a year to end world hunger” – that is, until we provide the necessary infrastructure that provides food security (ad which meets the tenet of “teach a man to fish”).
Let’s compare this to the war on humanity launched by “the powers that be”.
The US spent 5 trillion dollars (of taxpayers money it did not have) on its useless and deadly pandemic response, the EU plus UK probably the same, and other governments (representing 90% of the world's remaining population) the same again.
Global governments made the choice to spend fifteen trillion dollars on useless and harmful measures, rather than a few hundred billion a year for, say, ten years, to end world hunger. Worse still, the costs of treating the billions of “vaccine” damaged in the developed world will easily quadruple what is currently spent on healthcare in the next few years.
Welcome to Planet Stupid.
For the sake of interest, let’s ball-park the budgets and staffing levels at the WHO and a few of the larger government “aid” agencies (excluding World Bank, EIB, other countries’ projects (like Belt and Road) IMF and the United Nations.
For the WHO, from here:
About WHO https://www.who.int/about/
And here:
The U.S. Government and the World Health Organization | KFF
https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/fact-sheet/the-u-s-government-and-the-world-health-organization/
The WHO has an annual budget of around 6 billion US dollars and employs around 7,000 people in 150 countries. 87% of its funding is from the private sector (especially Bill Gates). Around one fifth of its annual budget goes to its head office in Geneva, with the remainder distributed around 6 regional offices. Check this out for how the WHO will “never let a crisis go to waste”.
Now let’s look at a few country/regional “aid” agencies. None of these bodies has any legal right to operate in any country.
USAID - U.S. Agency for International Development (usaid.gov)
USAID has nine thousand employees (1,800 overseas). Annual budget of 60 billion dollars.
The UK, via its Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office, spends 0.7% of its GDP on overseas aid, which is around 16 billion dollars. Its annual budget is around 8 billion dollars. It employs over 17,000 people in total (embassies, consulates and the like) with no easily discoverable number working specifically on aid projects.
UK spending on foreign aid - Full Fact
https://fullfact.org/economy/uk-spending-foreign-aid/
Npw for the EU. Remember it is a socialist bloc; it excels in spending other people’s money - or borrowing and monetizing it- whilst imposing bureaucratic regulations on its own citizens.
From here, the EU spends 50 billion a year on foreign aid:
Recipients and results of EU aid | European Commission (europa.eu)
Amount spent on overseas “aid” by the US, UK and EU? Around 126 billion dollars annually.
Remember, this excludes development projects run by the World Bank and the EIB, or the UN or “Belt and Road”.
Is it really beyond the ability of these organizations to work together to produce a plan to heal those with cleft lips, poisoned water, pneumonia and hunger in their own countries/regions and the developing world – given the trillions spent on a “bad flu” epidemic?
I find it ironic that there are probably as many economic migrants from the countries’ where aid is spent, living in the countries that are donating aid, as there are receiving it in those countries receiving the aid. (Tens of millions in the US and EU, millions in the UK).
Lastly, I leave you with this little gem from Dr Joseph Mercola
https://principia-scientific.com/health-officials-admit-bill-gates-runs-the-world/
“According to Politico, four health organizations — the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the Wellcome Trust — rapidly took a lead on the global pandemic response, and while all four claim to be independent organizations, they’re all actually founded and/or funded by Gates.”
In other words, not a single government body or health regulator did a thing to tackle the pandemic and instead washed their hands (for 20 seconds, no doubt) of the whole affair.
For a little more context, check out the number of employees at these global companies
Ford 186,000, GM 157,000, Apple 154,000, Google 140,000, Boeing 142,000, Airbus 142,000, P&G 101,000 (the UK's National Health Service has 1.3 million!!!).
Now, imagine if Boeing, Airbus, Ford and GM decided what safety was required or what defects caused accidents..