World Council for Health legal panel .. GMOs & DNA in the shots .. issues & implications .. the role of govts
my slides for the panel
good Substack folk,
On 27 November 2023 at 7pm UTC, Monday .. or 6am Tuesday morning for we folk on Sydney time .. the World Council for Health is hosting a legal panel to flesh-out the implications surrounding all this synthetic DNA contamination, and the fact of these C19 poisons meeting GMO legal definitions in so many jurisdictions .. about which regulators remained silent on, and in so doing left citizens unaware of what they were being asked to receive
.. heinous stuff, right
join me, Katie Ashby-Koppens, Peter Fam and many more for the discussion as we lay out some legal facts and truth .. clic the pic to register free
below are the slides with reference links i will be speaking to .. some of the below will appear in Katie’s presentation but are included here for ease
.. whats with the push for these LNP-modRNA complexes?
folk only needed a nasal spray containing lab made in vitro translated synthetic spike protein
why the need to get human cells to dangerously create the synthetic spike when the spike could have been made safely and contaminate free, in a lab, then nasal pumped?
https://x.com/BCdrainoty/status/1723803738765238380?s=20
.. but, as The Bat Lady herself (and colleagues) demonstrated in March 2020, a nasal spray containing EK1C4 was all that was needed
.. very safe and long known to be an excellent prophylaxis and early treatment against coronavirus, and SARS-CoV-2 too
.. so, neither was there a need for synthetic spike in a nasal spray
.. but ‘they’ did not tell you this because ‘they’ wanted to infiltrate and hijack people’s cells with their special sauce
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32231345/
read that again .. the year 2000
the planning for creating this legislation occurred well before 2000
.. meaning at least 30 years of expertise in Australia to date .. but in fact, much much longer than that
Dr Raj Bhula .. Australia’s gene technology Regulator meant to be running the OGTR, is part of a long line of Australian expertise when it comes to GMOs
she and the members of the Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee meant to advise her in respect of these Covid poisons, to protect Australians and their health, did not go MIA .. instead they shut the door on Australians, even our babies, and quickly ushered Pfizer and Moderna in and straight to the TGA, by-passing all OGTR safety protocols .. and kept these GMOs secret from everyone
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/gta2000162/s10.html
focus on the ‘any’ which means effectively almost everything/anything is a ‘biological entity’
.. and (c) .. capable of transferring genetic material
the LNP-modRNA complexes are that organism, that GMO
the LNPs do the transferring around the body of folk, and transfect the modRNA into cells .. all a simple physical transferring or transporting of nucleic acid cargo to cells
.. and the goddamn synthetic DNA encapsulated in the LNPs does the same
as LNP-modDNA complexes
as another GMO
unequivocally Pfizer and Moderna create modified synthetic genes and genetic material in the lab/factory .. that’s their grift .. their crime
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/gta2000162/s40.html
.. section 40 begins by saying ‘may apply’ .. so it sounds optional upon first reading .. but because of the crime of dealing with GMOs without a licence, that makes it downright obligatory
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/gta2000162/s10.html
.. as i was saying, the crime
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/gta2000162/s32.html
which is why we had to step in with our GMO legal proceedings
.. lend a hand if you can .. we still have much to do, like the local lab testing we are getting performed to confirm the TGA imported the DNA contamination into Australia, and into the bodies of Australians
both Pfizer and Moderna only manufacture in a few sites, then ship globally .. with confirmed DNA contamination in the Netherlands, Germany, Japan (see Kevin’s latest substack where his team has confirmed Japanese contamination, they are just quantifying how bad it is), three sites in the US, and Canada .. well, the issue for Australia appears to be just how excessively contaminated are Australian vials, not forgetting this contamination varies widely from batch to batch
.. when you read the UK Environmental Protection Act, just like the Australian gene Technology Act, appreciate that ‘environment’ includes the human body .. the inside of each and everyone of us
.. that is exactly what this legislation is required to protect .. humans
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/43/section/106
.. yes, very similar to Australia’s GMO definitions, right
clearly GMO experts in Australia and the UK had conferred to reach this type of consensus, meaning a lot of fore knowledge on GMOs has been held in Australia and the UK for a long long time
yes, the UK has its own Genetically Modified Organisms (Deliberate Release) Regulations 2002
yes .. reaching right back to 2002
.. created because of tons of earlier research and knowledge of the dangers that GMOs represent, reaching far back into last century
.. and regulation 5 defines ‘artifically modified’:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/2443/regulation/5
propagation above includes in E.Coli when brewing up these drugs, and later within humans in the sense of (a) human gut bacteria able to propagate the whole plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process and (b), propagation in the sense of either or both the modRNA reverse transcribing into Human chromosomal DNA, or the synthetic DNA contamination integrating with natural chromosomal DNA and being thereafter copied (propagated) following cell division .. meiosis and mitosis
Risk assessment: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/43/section/108
Consent: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/43/section/111
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/2443/regulation/15
.. so .. if this stuff was only destined to be sprayed on plants, an extensive UK Risk Assessment involving public submissions and consultation would have been required, plus the consent of the UK Secretary of State
but .. when you want to inject it into humans .. the manufacturers get a free pass, and do not even have to mention it on the Product Information accompanying the vials to consumers
.. do you feel like Regulation 15 was inserted for the public’s safety and benefit, or to benefit the makers and some other agenda?
Pfizer UK application under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 .. see page 5:
Moderna UK application under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 .. see page 6:
.. the above exemption just do not make any sense, right
Pfizer and Moderna took advantage of these provisions to stay Mum about their GMOs, but that did not relieve the UK government or the MHRA of their Common Law duty to inform the public that these ‘products’ contain GMOs
like Australia, the UK government is stuffed full with GMO experts and advisors
.. but everyone of them all of sudden went dull and mute and stupid, right?
For the EMA/EU GMO laws and Pfizer and Moderna applications .. see my peer reviewed paper: The Canaries in the Human DNA Mine
the full text of the EU GMO law can be read here:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32001L0018
again, almost mirror legal definitions to the UK and Aus
https://www.fda.gov/media/70809/download
the murky US .. ambivalence masters, except when a court sets the industry inserted double-speak straight
.. when?
perhaps 50 years hence like the Thalidomide scandal .. or the US created Vioxx scandal .. or the US autism scandal
billions in lobbying .. cash on display
law and regulatory order amounting to, essentially: f*ck you citizen
the exemption/exclusion falsely granted by the FDA to Pfizer and Moderna from having to prepare Environmental Assessments in respect of their new drug substances
.. which would have required public disclosure and consultation about their LNP-modRNA fitting legal and regulatory definitions of GMOs and/or Gene Therapy
.. section 25.31(a):
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=25.31
and yeeah .. that would have necessitated Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity studies before the sham Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA)
.. but of course the US EUAs are further clouded by being brought under the US Department of Defense as ‘countermeasures’, which meant most FDA safeguards no longer applied, like legitimate clinical trials (re the Brook Jackson lawsuit), meaning the role of the FDA was largely theatre and window dressing
really grand theatre
.. perhaps the greatest tragic theatre in all human history
remembering .. all theatre requires script writers, right
25.31(a) could only apply in respect of an active moiety that had been previously approved .. the modRNA as the active moiety of Pfizer and Moderna had, of course, never been previously approved
Go FDA!
.. and in turn the diligent TGA .. who relied upon all of the good work of the FDA to inform us all here in Down Under:
Uncle Sam’s FDA says they’re safe & effective .. and Europe’s EMA checked them out too .. so no worries, Aussies .. they’re safe & effective
.. good to know the TGA is on the honker with the FDA at least twice a week, to never miss a beat
thank you Brendan Murphy
thank you John Skerritt
.. for your unfailing service in the protection of (?) Australia’s men, woman, and children .. and babies
as for you Raj Bhula .. and the GTTAC .. you know what you were asked to do sometime around late 2020 .. probably those guys above muscled you .. probably best now we all get this out in the open, sooner, rajther than later
because you TGA/OGTR folk are still pushing this crap
.. and folk are still needlessly dying and being maimed
.. and you have been receiving articles like this, and lawyer correspondence from us, since early 2022 .. you know, receipts
.. time to pull up, perhaps?
for the rest of the good folk here, we hope you have some time to watch the World Council for Health legal panel
Brendan, John, and Raj .. you are invited too
thank you for reading