An article in the Lancet claims that 20 million lives were saved with the use of injections. (Note, the injections are not “vaccines”, they are gene therapies, that is therapeutics like Ivermectin, that should have been regulated as therapeutics. The manufacturers state this in their regulatory submissions and SEC filings.
Here is the article
Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study - The Lancet Infectious Diseases
A bright red flag is here:
“This work was supported by a Schmidt Science Fellowship in partnership with the Rhodes Trust (OJW), Centre funding from the UK Medical Research Council (all authors), grant funding from WHO (OJW, ABH, PW, and ACG), Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (JT and ACG), support from the Imperial College Research Fellowship (PW and ABH), and support from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology and Community Jameel (all authors). We thank Sondre Ulvund Solstad from The Economist for developing excess mortality statistics and their help in interpreting these estimates.”
There is an excellent critique of the content here:
Did Covid Vaccines Save Tens of Millions of Lives? ⋆ Brownstone Institute
A single logical fallacy destroys the claims in the piece published on the Lancet. Brownstone (Roger Koops) describes it like this:
“C. Population Susceptibility
The above piece completely ignores the huge gradient in mortality susceptibility in the population. Younger people have had very low infection mortality throughout the past two years. The mathematical models assume the same level of mortality susceptibility across all populations. This assumption we know to be a fallacy and completely negates any of their “models.”
In other words, the Lancet piece assumes that the young have the same remaining life as the elderly. Ludicrous.
Instead, there needs to be a discussion around how many people the injections have killed or wounded with conditions that will develop into morbidities.
A reminder of the logic that the injections have killed 20 million people.
Add the EUDRA and VAERS adverse event data on deaths and “events” together, multiply by an under-reporting factor of 40, globalize the EU+US one eighth share of 12.5 billion global doses.
VAERS (take only the US data) 13,972 deaths and 854,084 adverse reactions to 5 August 2022
VAERS Summary for COVID-19 Vaccines through 8/5/2022 – VAERS Analysis
EUDRA (ignore the headline and scoot to the first image on the landing page) 46,999 deaths and 4,731,833 injuries
76,789 Deaths 6,089,773 Injuries Reported in U.S. and European Databases Following COVID-19 Vaccines - Vaccine Impact
Number of US injections = around 600m (increased to 608 million in the last few weeks)
CDC COVID Data Tracker: Vaccinations in the US
Number of EU injections = around 900m (increased to 915 million in the last few weeks)
Number of global injections = around 12 billion (increased to 12.5 billion in the last few weeks)
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations - Our World in Data
The Lazarus Report showing less than one in 100 vaccination injuries are reported - see page 6 of 7 here that states “..fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health.”
Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS) (ahrq.gov)
Using a one in 100 under-reporting factor (URF) would make the injections horribly deadly and injurious (1.4 million deaths and 85 million injuries for the 600 million doses administered).
A more recent attempt at estimating the URF is around 40, here:
Determining the VAERS Under-Reporting Multiplier (healthimpactnews.com)
So, EU+US deaths = 13,972 + 46,999 = 60,971 deaths
and EU+US injuries = 854,084 + 6,089,773 = 6,943,857 (multiple per person, half of which are “serious”).
Multiply by 40 for URF and then by 8 to “globalize”
Global deaths are around 19.5 million SO FAR and global injuries are around 2.2 billion.
Those injuries are likely to develop into “conditions” and then morbidities.
WHO do you believe?
In the early 1800s when Jenner started his madness that got us to where we're at now, a Rabbi coined the phrase: Jenner has saved MILLIONS OF LIVES!
They seem to be hung up with millions.
Thing of it is that early into the pollution the million number couldn't have been in play statistically IF and ONLY IF Jenner's pollution did anything but embed syphilis.
All that put aside, there is a principle in their jurisprudence that says YOU CAN'T PROVE A NEGATIVE IN COURT.
What they are claiming by the 'saving' (religious talk) of lives is that: THEY DIDN'T DIE.
They didn't die (a negative) because they got a shot.
There is no way even in the fiction of Law or the laws of biology to prove that any action or inaction led to a negative outcome = NOT dying.
It's absurd on the face of it and you could teach this to 3rd graders.
Then we add in the fact that ALL of the numbers from supposedly 7 billion people on the planet (need for crowd control!) of which I didn't count them, and then VAERS and other morbidity and mortality statistic whores are putting out numbers THAT NO THIRD PARTY HAS EVER VERIFIED.
So, this is the classic arguments of how many pinheads can dance on an angel.
Gates and his Freddy Kruger smirk featured: Lying with Statistics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJarLFxQIS4
This is mass murder, and nobdy has been held accountable yet. Instead they are even doubling down and pushing their experimental stuff again. So unreal!