Apologies in advance for my question. What is Covid bivalent booster. Is that the one with the Flu jab inside or is it the old jab with something poisonous removed. Just wondering. I wouldn't take any vaccinations or give them to children if I had them young again. I'll probably never go to the doctor again unless I break a limb. I'll find and make my own remedies, plenty of information out there and eat as healthy as possible with what they've done to our beautiful soil and water
However all TRIALS were actually done on Wuhan + BA.1 and not on BA.4 and BA.5, so basically they are swapping the TESTED product in minor animal and human trials for a TOTALLY UNTESTED VERSION, whilst stating ...."Well the same process is used, so what the hell, its bound to be just as safe and just as good". Even though the data in 8 mice, found that the antbody response to the BA.4 and BA.5 version was piss poor, compared to the Wuhan antiboides, or those of BA.1 bi-valent.
So the Bi-valent is NOT A FLU SHOT mixed with Covid Strains, it is 3 Covid Strains with 2 Spike protein structures. BA.1 is no longer circulating (if you believe any covid strain ever was), so they swapped to a supposedly active variant of Omicron without ANY DATA or TRIALS.
This is why Dr Paul Offit on CNN said "There will not be time for human studies before these are approved and it would be nice to at least have some human data to calculate a risk to benefit ratio for the new shots!" - In other words, like the approval for 5-11yr olds "STICK IT IN ARMS, THEN WE WILL FIND OUT LATER!"
10% = one event reported for every ten events experienced
dr jessica rose estimated around one event reported in 40 events experienced- which works out at 100/40 - 2.5% of events reported.
the Lazarus report calculated 0.87% events reported which works out at less than one event reported out of 100 events experienced.
so the under reporting factor (URF) is around 100 (multiply the events reported to VAERS by 100) , Dr Rose estimates the URF to be 40 (mutiply VAERS numbers by 40) and if you want to be optimistic, use a URF of 10 (10% events reported).
the point is, we have to come up with some URF multiplier to gauge the severity of adverwse events. we can cross check the URF in many ways. 40 seems the most robust estimate, as it has eben checked in many different ways.
Yes, the Harvard Study of VAERS came to conclusion the URF is probably 99% in that VAERS captures less than 1& of prior jab injuries before Covid. Therefore under Covid, either the reporting will have raised since then, due to awareness of VAERS, or given all the suppression it could be less, as Del Bigtree suggests and therefore be around 0.5%.
Either way, it means the VAERS stats need to be X by 99%, or perhaps even more.
However it is generally thought that VAERS may capture perhaps upto 10% of ADRs and other estimate use an Under Reporting Factor of 40.
Regardless, even at the stated VAERS stats as taken at face value, covid shots have beaten all 31 years of Vaccine Deaths within 9 months and eclipsed it many times over, so are clearly the most dangerous injectable bar a deliberate lethal injection. However, in baby deaths, in 1st trimester the shots have an 82% spontaneous abortion or still birth rate, which is actually higher than the morning after pills efficiency!
20 MILLION DEAD and 2.2 BILLION MAIMED! He is likely correct too, as that falls as 16% real doses vs placebo from 12.7 BILLION DOSES administered globally, so fits the HOT LOT Batch Theories estimated 20% rate of real shots to 80% of placebos.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/other/what-to-know-about-the-new-covid-subvariants-and-how-to-best-protect-yourself/ar-AA133sbE
check out mr kirsch's slide deck
https://www.skirsch.com/covid/TheData.pdf
slides 27 through 31 for URF discussion
Apologies in advance for my question. What is Covid bivalent booster. Is that the one with the Flu jab inside or is it the old jab with something poisonous removed. Just wondering. I wouldn't take any vaccinations or give them to children if I had them young again. I'll probably never go to the doctor again unless I break a limb. I'll find and make my own remedies, plenty of information out there and eat as healthy as possible with what they've done to our beautiful soil and water
FDA EUA licensing for the new Bi-Valents https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-moderna-pfizer-biontech-bivalent-covid-19-vaccines-use basically the new shots are WUHAN strain (original SPIKE protein instruction), plus the instruction for BA.4 and BA.5 strains SPIKE (which is identical across those 2 strains).
However all TRIALS were actually done on Wuhan + BA.1 and not on BA.4 and BA.5, so basically they are swapping the TESTED product in minor animal and human trials for a TOTALLY UNTESTED VERSION, whilst stating ...."Well the same process is used, so what the hell, its bound to be just as safe and just as good". Even though the data in 8 mice, found that the antbody response to the BA.4 and BA.5 version was piss poor, compared to the Wuhan antiboides, or those of BA.1 bi-valent.
So the Bi-valent is NOT A FLU SHOT mixed with Covid Strains, it is 3 Covid Strains with 2 Spike protein structures. BA.1 is no longer circulating (if you believe any covid strain ever was), so they swapped to a supposedly active variant of Omicron without ANY DATA or TRIALS.
This is why Dr Paul Offit on CNN said "There will not be time for human studies before these are approved and it would be nice to at least have some human data to calculate a risk to benefit ratio for the new shots!" - In other words, like the approval for 5-11yr olds "STICK IT IN ARMS, THEN WE WILL FIND OUT LATER!"
They should all be hung!!
Under reporting is reasonably understood to be 10%.
I'm hopeless at mathematics! So does the 10% mean only 10% of cases reported?
Then if correct. 90% might be closer to the true number of everything?
Thank you Mr. H. for your time & dedication in exposing this.
10% = one event reported for every ten events experienced
dr jessica rose estimated around one event reported in 40 events experienced- which works out at 100/40 - 2.5% of events reported.
the Lazarus report calculated 0.87% events reported which works out at less than one event reported out of 100 events experienced.
so the under reporting factor (URF) is around 100 (multiply the events reported to VAERS by 100) , Dr Rose estimates the URF to be 40 (mutiply VAERS numbers by 40) and if you want to be optimistic, use a URF of 10 (10% events reported).
the point is, we have to come up with some URF multiplier to gauge the severity of adverwse events. we can cross check the URF in many ways. 40 seems the most robust estimate, as it has eben checked in many different ways.
here is a link to Dr Rose's work
https://healthimpactnews.com/determining-the-vaers-under-reporting-multiplier/
and here is a link to the Lazarus report - which shows the URF at more than 100 (0.87% events reported) from 2011
https://www.coursehero.com/file/88671789/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011pdf/
Yes, the Harvard Study of VAERS came to conclusion the URF is probably 99% in that VAERS captures less than 1& of prior jab injuries before Covid. Therefore under Covid, either the reporting will have raised since then, due to awareness of VAERS, or given all the suppression it could be less, as Del Bigtree suggests and therefore be around 0.5%.
Either way, it means the VAERS stats need to be X by 99%, or perhaps even more.
However it is generally thought that VAERS may capture perhaps upto 10% of ADRs and other estimate use an Under Reporting Factor of 40.
Regardless, even at the stated VAERS stats as taken at face value, covid shots have beaten all 31 years of Vaccine Deaths within 9 months and eclipsed it many times over, so are clearly the most dangerous injectable bar a deliberate lethal injection. However, in baby deaths, in 1st trimester the shots have an 82% spontaneous abortion or still birth rate, which is actually higher than the morning after pills efficiency!
The most recent estimate by statistician Peter Halligan is staggering!
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/10/20-million-dead-from-the-jab-2-2-billion-injured-analyst-estimates-video/ref/8/
20 MILLION DEAD and 2.2 BILLION MAIMED! He is likely correct too, as that falls as 16% real doses vs placebo from 12.7 BILLION DOSES administered globally, so fits the HOT LOT Batch Theories estimated 20% rate of real shots to 80% of placebos.
It's astounding, isn't it?