A look at how C19 injections are faring in the UK, compared to “cases” and deaths with C19 present PLUS a reminder of the murder of the elderly by the UK government using Midazolam
Let’s start with a hat tip to the four people running the “Daily Sceptic” and then move on to a data source (re-presenting official data in legible form) the UK Freedom Project and its latest (published in November 2022) Summary of the UK’s adverse event reporting system – Yellow Card – updated to 26 October 2022.
Using the UK Freedom Projects data from the Summary, plus data from the usual WorldOMeter and OurWorldinData we can set the UK C19 experience so far.
First the adverse reaction data:
A primer, the UK Government states the following here:
“It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported. Under-reporting coupled with a decline in reporting makes it especially important to report all suspicions of adverse drug reactions to the Yellow Card Scheme.”
Ten per cent of “serious” reactions and 2-4% of non-serious reactions. The writer of that statement may or may not have been using the standard terminology – “serious” = life threatening and “severe” = life changing. Nonetheless, only one in ten “serious” reactions are reported and only in 25 to one in 50 “non-serious” reactions.
A few points to note about the table. Firstly, the UK authorities realized the “initial treatment protocol” it had rolled out to everyone in decreasing age cohorts starting in December 2020 was useless by the time of the first booster shots in mid-September 2021 (when it started injecting medical staff with the booster). Second there is no detail extracted from the MHRA by the Freedom Project on who the manufactures of the boosters were. Thirdly, the adverse events for the boosters look extremely low compared to the other data. Fourthly, there is no detail on reactions after a first or second shot, only the anonymous booster shots. Lastly, I have added four rows – unadjusted adverse events and deaths per million doses, and adverse events and deaths adjusted for an under-reporting factor (URF) of 10. It would probably make more sense to apply a URF of 25 to adverse events, but let’s keep it simple.
Check out the Moderna column. Moderna shots are twice as deadly as Pfizer and 16% more deadly than Astra Zeneca – so unless all those booster shots went to Moderna from Astra Zeneca with Pfizer BioNTech’s share of the total remaining constant, Moderna is far and away the most deadly.
Adverse reactions are even worse. Moderna’s injections are four times more damaging than Pfizers and more than double those of AstraZeneca.
So, given these facts, what would you expect a rational and smart Government and Health Regulator to do? Favour Pfizer and Astra Zeneca? Of course not, the kakistocrats that pass for Health Regulators and the UK Government live in a clown world of their own devising. Ignoring relative harms. Maybe the data on adverse events was different a year ago, but check out these stories, not just about the UK, but also Canada and Australia.
Moderna To Build A New Vaccine Plant In The UK (pharmprom.net)
Moderna to build mRNA vaccine manufacturing facility in Australia - Austrade
Moderna to sign agreement to build mRNA production plant in Canada | CBC News
Not bad hey? Where does all that money come from? Profits from making poisonous injections and government sponsorship (taxpayers or more likely debt market borrowings) of course!
The current UK Prime Minister has been taking a lot of flak from the press about potential conflicts of interest around Moderna and tax avoidance, along with his wife. Quite frankly, anyone that pays more tax than they should is an idiot. If a conflict of interest can be shown that places Prime Minister Sunak positioning himself ahead of contracts awarded by the UK Government, then fine, hang him high. As it is, his Moderna investment, if any, is about to go belly up because the harm that all C19 mRNA injections cause is being exposed. Moderna’s only defence is “the US Department of Defence forced me to make an injectable toxin using bad manufacturing processes”.
Take an hour out and watch Sasha Latypova drop (nuclear) truth bombs over how the entire scamdemic was a pantomime from start to finish, owned and operated in its entirety by the US Department of Defence.
Here’s a table showing summary characteristics of the UK C19 experience.
You can clearly see the benefit in the cases and deaths compared to the start of the injections, right? Oh wait, you can’t, because there are no benefits, only the forced increase in variants and the concomitant increase in case rates by a whopping 6 times in 2021 compared to 2020 and a staggering increased in cases of around ten times between 2022 and 2020. 95% effective right? Wrong. Massively negative impact. Pathetic.
But it is even worse than the harms of injections and the forced multiplier of unwarranted creation or cases and deaths by forcing new variants with injections (rule number 1 of virology – YOU DO NOT VACCINATE INTO AN EPIDEMIC).
As with the misdiagnosis of “cases” GLOBALLY using a debunked and useless Drosten RT-PCR test resulting in hundreds of thousands of US deaths from Remdesivir, respirators, denial of treatment with antibiotics – the UK had its own execution method of choice for its defenceless, frail and elderly people. You know the people with few remaining “Quality Life Years Left”.
Side Note, the WHO banned antibiotics for C19 treatment via Daszak and his shell companies – misdiagnosing bacterial infections as C19 meant no antibiotics – 95% of C19 cases were falsely diagnosed, so no life-saving antibiotics – mostly for the poor, the minorities, the weak and the elderly.
The UK’s “pathway of tears” imposed by politicians and inept health authorities.
MIDAZOLAM
This is a scandal that should be immediately investigated and prosecuted.
If you have the time, watch this 90 minute video from January 2022. It will outrage you.
This was covered in articles here:
MIDAZOLAM- The scandal that cannot be ignored – Unity News Network
And referenced by Dr Alexander here:
Very sad. Tens of thousands of the elderly and infirm killed by politicians and bureaucrats. Probably a sign that there is a growing trend to terminate “useless eaters” since they cost the “State” money, rather than paying taxes to the “State”. Never mind the right to life.
Thanks to my subscribers so far, don’t forget to subscribe if you are able and willing, or buy me a coffee here if you liked the article!
Hi Peter - the essential objection put forward by people such as my elderly father in defense of the shots - was that yes, the adverse events were sad, but that given the huge amount of jabs administered...weren't these inevitable in the task of saving lives overall?
Have the adverse events been proportionately any significantly higher this time around - than with other vaccination campaigns...that's what he was asking?
I'm sure they have been - massively - have been aware of the adverse events from early on - but I've not seen any analysis specifically on this 'proportionality' issue - that could be presented?
Proportionality was the key factor, for him.
I personally don't see how ANY lives were saved at all, by these shots...they certainly did no good, and instead did only harm as far as I can see...but has any analysis been done on his specific question - so that this rollout can clearly be compared to other, previous, much more limited vaccination campaigns?
In New Zealand news a Wellington research company who does work for Pfizer and AZ, is researching a combined covid and flu vaccine. They are asking fir trial participants. Here’s the story https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2022/12/wellington-medical-company-p3-research-looking-into-a-combined-flu-and-covid-19-vaccine.html