What do you mean by "Note that no autopsies are permitted on those reported dead to VAERS?" What law or regulation bans that? Links? Is it any kind of rule that is connected to whether you report to VAERS, or are you just reporting on the fact that most docs/labs/hospitals etc. at present will refuse to do autopsies which they know are aimed at finding mRNA harms?
Quite tight, there is no written law that bans autopsies - there is a "de facto" law imposed by regulators that denies funding of autopsies. He who controls the wallet, controls the spending.
Do you know of a list of autopsies done on the 17,000 dead reported to VAERS.
Perhaps if you do have such a list we can compare that to the cost of doing an autopsy and the cost of C19 injections.
"During this time, VAERS received 19,476 preliminary reports of death (0.0029%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA clinicians review reports of death to VAERS including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records."
so.. the CDC and FDA examine autopsies but I cannot locate any results. Can you help?
Autopsies have been done in the EU, which show direct cause and effect from injections, but nothing for the US.
I don't have a list. Nor is investigating this kind of thing in my skill-box. My substack does more reflection and punditry off of others' statistical and biological sluething and researching.
As for what you quote, interesting possible lead, although it could be fewer than a hundred autopsies, and they are all unlikely to be ones using the fine-grained histological procedures demonstrated by Arne and Bhakdi to locate spike-protein damage.
I have yet to find a piece about how to request such an autopsy yourself for a deceased loved one, or how much it would cost assuming you could find a willing professional. Anyone know?
A reply I saw to this question stated it normally costs $2,000-·3,000, if you could get one, but requests of families were turned down during this covid period. Doctors refused to do them despite being pressed hard. Were they banned subject to harsh penalty? It was apparently in the protocols of the hospitals to refuse autopsy too. A stipulation by 'the authorities' made it clear that no autopsies would be performed as it was too 'risky' for the professionals to undertake the work and contaminated bodies were to be cremated ASAP. No burials. Certainly a funeral director provided that opinion last week to the Canadian National Citizens' Inquiry. I'm confident the ban was 'made up' as an excuse so that no one would find out what was going on, but I don't remember if that was mentioned. I'm sure, like everything else, it was yet another right families were deprived of in the most horrific circumstances—it created a lot of hullabaloo.
Thank you, Salialoli. Not a prohibitive cost, and something laws in American red states or in moderate nations could help partially compensate. Not sure if the needed extra steps to arrive at Arne Burkhardt & S. Bhakdi quality autospies, which do the staining techniques necessary to detect spike damage and lympocyte swarms would add tons to that cost, though.
Also, by this point, regardless of whatever is being done in Canada (which is now one of most anti-liberal and regressive of the liberal democracies across the globe), there should be no required "protocols" in place for "died suddenly" & "cause unknown" situations which would restrict autopsies.
We also need to get them to come clean on the harm from all vaccines as well. We are being blatantly lied to. Wilful corruption.
Something I’ve been investigating in nz for a very long time. I have 36 years of experience to draw on when it comes to corruption in the New Zealand health system
In nz I know drs and specialists who have neurotoxic reactions to aluminium adjuvants in vaccines everytime they get one. I even obtained a recording recently of two court forensic psychiatrists acknowledging they know colleagues who have neurotoxic reactions and the symptoms associated with it
But the thing is if a patient has a neurotoxic reaction they have to tell the patient it’s not possible and a dr can lose their career by saying it is possible.
Our drs and psychiatrists are aware they are misdiagnosing people with mental illness to cover up the neurotoxic reactions to vaccine adjuvants
They have ruined many lives
The medical council in nz know who I am and what I know so recently I sent another email to them and copied the Prime Ministers chief science advisor in on it. He is also well aware of me and my evidence of this corruption
Here’s the email I sent
To the medical council
You see, being aware that there are doctors and specialists who have neurotoxic reactions to vaccines (like the flu vaccine) but then telling them they have to tell patients it’s not possible is corruption
Information printed in the vaccine handbook for doctors is knowingly fraudulent because you are aware that there are drs and specialists who have neurotoxic reactions to vaccine adjuvants
Worse still! If a dr tells a patient it’s possible to have a neurotoxic reaction to a vaccine you will punish them for their honesty.
Are you aware how many young peoples lives you have subverted and ruined because of your blatant corruption? And that if you fail to tell the truth you will ruin many many more young people’s lives in the future
That’s why you are corrupt and the history books will not be kind to you.
Surely you understand that the game is up now.
Now it was very brave for the court psychiatrist to put in their report that the issues in my twenties were caused by vaccines. They did that because they are fundamentally honest people and did not want to lie.
They obviously have a burden on their shoulders about being forced to conceal vaccine injuries by policy and the medical council.
I do hope the medical council don’t see their actions as reason to punish them because if you do then your hypocrisy and corruption knows no bounds.
Well done, sir! Let's hope there is a shred of decency left in those who are supposed to care for us.
I suspect that the case you bring needs to be backed up with data, like that which is NOT reported to NZ's adverse event reporting system. I don't know if that information is kept at the local hospital level or other place that treats neuro-toxic conditions - with a record per injection that caused the condition.
In New Zealand you can’t get help for a neurotoxic reaction. The COO of the southern district health board told me they were even phasing our neurologists from our health system.
Things are pretty shocking in the nz health system.
The media are going to be doing a story on me on long term abuse in state care. In the medical system.
In 2020 the smoking gun evidence was found that my 2008 surgeon smuggled a foreign object into theatre and put it in front of my spine. He’s been trying to cover it up.
My mother and I were shown the scan but then they started covering it up
The surgeon who found it is just keeping quiet. He refuses to answer police questions
Then the police received a letter from a health bureaucrat telling them to stop the investigation
So I sent death threats and then rung the police and told them to come arrest me.
It’s meant I can chose a jury trial for my defence. I’m claiming self defence due to long term abuse by the state and that I’m morally obligated to protect the public from harm as the surgeon has been blatantly covering up the crime too and is still at large.
I made the threats against the surgeon who found the evidence who I got on with well. This means my lawyer can ask him about the scan he found.
I have requested the scan through the courts but the health department are defying the courts.
The long term abuse started 36 years ago and they knew what they were doing.
The surgeon who did the crime colluded with others to get me diagnosed as delusional for saying me and mum were shown the object in a 3D scan by my 2020 surgeon.
My GP has now stopped gaslighting me as he is aware the delusional diagnosis is fraudulent and as it’s affecting the courts he has to act.
The delusional diagnosis meant a court psychiatric report had to be ordered. So that report went well but it mentions what happened in my teens and twenties and that I was diagnosed as mentally ill.
So I will be challenging that because it was discovered in my 20s it was a neurotoxic reaction to vaccines but they covered it up.
The court forensic psychiatrists who did the recent report has told the judge that it was vaccines that caused it which was very brave of them.
In my 30s I had further adverse events to a spinal implant and that’s when I was in touch with prof Vera Stejskal for 3 years
We discussed my history and she agreed about the vaccines being the cause of issues in my 20s and she would know. It’s her specialty. My issues when younger always started after vaccination, would resolve each time after 9-10 months and only happened the years I got vaccinated. It was obvious and when I realised this in my late 20s I purposely got another vaccine to test my theory.
Sure enough the same thing happened
That’s when I tried telling my drs and got a diagnosis of somatic disorder for even suggesting it.
So the trial is my defence. But it’s in front of a jury and will open a huge can of worms that will need addressing
I have recorded evidence which shows our drs and psychiatrists know that our health authorities are lying when they say it’s not possible for a vaccine to cause a neurotoxic injury
If our drs diagnose a neurotoxic reaction to a vaccine the medical council will punish them
It's actually called "fake" wtf? They've been so out in the open on this, I can't believe so many people took the death jab.
I will buy you 10 coffees when you states this is a genocide committed by jews, you know, the truth.
What do you mean by "Note that no autopsies are permitted on those reported dead to VAERS?" What law or regulation bans that? Links? Is it any kind of rule that is connected to whether you report to VAERS, or are you just reporting on the fact that most docs/labs/hospitals etc. at present will refuse to do autopsies which they know are aimed at finding mRNA harms?
Quite tight, there is no written law that bans autopsies - there is a "de facto" law imposed by regulators that denies funding of autopsies. He who controls the wallet, controls the spending.
Do you know of a list of autopsies done on the 17,000 dead reported to VAERS.
Perhaps if you do have such a list we can compare that to the cost of doing an autopsy and the cost of C19 injections.
From here: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html
we have this:
"During this time, VAERS received 19,476 preliminary reports of death (0.0029%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA clinicians review reports of death to VAERS including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records."
so.. the CDC and FDA examine autopsies but I cannot locate any results. Can you help?
Autopsies have been done in the EU, which show direct cause and effect from injections, but nothing for the US.
I don't have a list. Nor is investigating this kind of thing in my skill-box. My substack does more reflection and punditry off of others' statistical and biological sluething and researching.
As for what you quote, interesting possible lead, although it could be fewer than a hundred autopsies, and they are all unlikely to be ones using the fine-grained histological procedures demonstrated by Arne and Bhakdi to locate spike-protein damage.
I have yet to find a piece about how to request such an autopsy yourself for a deceased loved one, or how much it would cost assuming you could find a willing professional. Anyone know?
A reply I saw to this question stated it normally costs $2,000-·3,000, if you could get one, but requests of families were turned down during this covid period. Doctors refused to do them despite being pressed hard. Were they banned subject to harsh penalty? It was apparently in the protocols of the hospitals to refuse autopsy too. A stipulation by 'the authorities' made it clear that no autopsies would be performed as it was too 'risky' for the professionals to undertake the work and contaminated bodies were to be cremated ASAP. No burials. Certainly a funeral director provided that opinion last week to the Canadian National Citizens' Inquiry. I'm confident the ban was 'made up' as an excuse so that no one would find out what was going on, but I don't remember if that was mentioned. I'm sure, like everything else, it was yet another right families were deprived of in the most horrific circumstances—it created a lot of hullabaloo.
Thank you, Salialoli. Not a prohibitive cost, and something laws in American red states or in moderate nations could help partially compensate. Not sure if the needed extra steps to arrive at Arne Burkhardt & S. Bhakdi quality autospies, which do the staining techniques necessary to detect spike damage and lympocyte swarms would add tons to that cost, though.
Also, by this point, regardless of whatever is being done in Canada (which is now one of most anti-liberal and regressive of the liberal democracies across the globe), there should be no required "protocols" in place for "died suddenly" & "cause unknown" situations which would restrict autopsies.
Some stuff more people should be aware of:
Nattokinase Degrades the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein
https://drjessesantiano.com/nattokinase-degrades-the-sars-cov-2-spike-protein/
13 ways that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein causes damage
https://drjessesantiano.com/13-ways-that-the-sars-cov-2-spike-protein-causes-damage/
Bromelain inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection via targeting ACE-2, TMPRSS2, and spike protein
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctm2.281
Adjunctive Use of Oral MAF is Associated with No Disease Progression or Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: COral-MAF1 Trial
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4041404
Potential role of GcMAF in suppressing the severity of COVID-19-induced immune responses: Lesson learned from HIV
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030698772031392X
Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer with Gc Protein-Derived Macrophage-Activating Factor, GcMAF
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2510818/
Case Report: GcMAF Treatment in a Patient with Multiple Sclerosis
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27354653/
The in vitro GcMAF effects on endocannabinoid system transcriptionomics, receptor formation, and cell activity of autism-derived macrophages
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996516/
We also need to get them to come clean on the harm from all vaccines as well. We are being blatantly lied to. Wilful corruption.
Something I’ve been investigating in nz for a very long time. I have 36 years of experience to draw on when it comes to corruption in the New Zealand health system
In nz I know drs and specialists who have neurotoxic reactions to aluminium adjuvants in vaccines everytime they get one. I even obtained a recording recently of two court forensic psychiatrists acknowledging they know colleagues who have neurotoxic reactions and the symptoms associated with it
But the thing is if a patient has a neurotoxic reaction they have to tell the patient it’s not possible and a dr can lose their career by saying it is possible.
Our drs and psychiatrists are aware they are misdiagnosing people with mental illness to cover up the neurotoxic reactions to vaccine adjuvants
They have ruined many lives
The medical council in nz know who I am and what I know so recently I sent another email to them and copied the Prime Ministers chief science advisor in on it. He is also well aware of me and my evidence of this corruption
Here’s the email I sent
To the medical council
You see, being aware that there are doctors and specialists who have neurotoxic reactions to vaccines (like the flu vaccine) but then telling them they have to tell patients it’s not possible is corruption
Information printed in the vaccine handbook for doctors is knowingly fraudulent because you are aware that there are drs and specialists who have neurotoxic reactions to vaccine adjuvants
Worse still! If a dr tells a patient it’s possible to have a neurotoxic reaction to a vaccine you will punish them for their honesty.
Are you aware how many young peoples lives you have subverted and ruined because of your blatant corruption? And that if you fail to tell the truth you will ruin many many more young people’s lives in the future
That’s why you are corrupt and the history books will not be kind to you.
Surely you understand that the game is up now.
Now it was very brave for the court psychiatrist to put in their report that the issues in my twenties were caused by vaccines. They did that because they are fundamentally honest people and did not want to lie.
They obviously have a burden on their shoulders about being forced to conceal vaccine injuries by policy and the medical council.
I do hope the medical council don’t see their actions as reason to punish them because if you do then your hypocrisy and corruption knows no bounds.
Kind regards
Mark Kennard
Well done, sir! Let's hope there is a shred of decency left in those who are supposed to care for us.
I suspect that the case you bring needs to be backed up with data, like that which is NOT reported to NZ's adverse event reporting system. I don't know if that information is kept at the local hospital level or other place that treats neuro-toxic conditions - with a record per injection that caused the condition.
All the best
In New Zealand you can’t get help for a neurotoxic reaction. The COO of the southern district health board told me they were even phasing our neurologists from our health system.
Things are pretty shocking in the nz health system.
The media are going to be doing a story on me on long term abuse in state care. In the medical system.
In 2020 the smoking gun evidence was found that my 2008 surgeon smuggled a foreign object into theatre and put it in front of my spine. He’s been trying to cover it up.
My mother and I were shown the scan but then they started covering it up
The surgeon who found it is just keeping quiet. He refuses to answer police questions
Then the police received a letter from a health bureaucrat telling them to stop the investigation
So I sent death threats and then rung the police and told them to come arrest me.
It’s meant I can chose a jury trial for my defence. I’m claiming self defence due to long term abuse by the state and that I’m morally obligated to protect the public from harm as the surgeon has been blatantly covering up the crime too and is still at large.
I made the threats against the surgeon who found the evidence who I got on with well. This means my lawyer can ask him about the scan he found.
I have requested the scan through the courts but the health department are defying the courts.
The long term abuse started 36 years ago and they knew what they were doing.
The surgeon who did the crime colluded with others to get me diagnosed as delusional for saying me and mum were shown the object in a 3D scan by my 2020 surgeon.
My GP has now stopped gaslighting me as he is aware the delusional diagnosis is fraudulent and as it’s affecting the courts he has to act.
The delusional diagnosis meant a court psychiatric report had to be ordered. So that report went well but it mentions what happened in my teens and twenties and that I was diagnosed as mentally ill.
So I will be challenging that because it was discovered in my 20s it was a neurotoxic reaction to vaccines but they covered it up.
The court forensic psychiatrists who did the recent report has told the judge that it was vaccines that caused it which was very brave of them.
In my 30s I had further adverse events to a spinal implant and that’s when I was in touch with prof Vera Stejskal for 3 years
We discussed my history and she agreed about the vaccines being the cause of issues in my 20s and she would know. It’s her specialty. My issues when younger always started after vaccination, would resolve each time after 9-10 months and only happened the years I got vaccinated. It was obvious and when I realised this in my late 20s I purposely got another vaccine to test my theory.
Sure enough the same thing happened
That’s when I tried telling my drs and got a diagnosis of somatic disorder for even suggesting it.
So the trial is my defence. But it’s in front of a jury and will open a huge can of worms that will need addressing
I have recorded evidence which shows our drs and psychiatrists know that our health authorities are lying when they say it’s not possible for a vaccine to cause a neurotoxic injury
If our drs diagnose a neurotoxic reaction to a vaccine the medical council will punish them
Your case may be replicated with these mRNA injections as they cross the blood brain barrier and maybe also become neuro toxic.
I am rooting for you and hope your discovery process exposes what could be a global and avoidable issue.
All the best
Cheers Peter.