Nothing is 100% effective, especially military defenses and attacks. Were the protected sites heavily damaged, knocked out of action or suffered massive casualties?
Thanks, Peter. An interesting commentary from Ritter. I've wondered with these exchanges if each side is testing the response and capabilities of the other side. Perhaps.
Nothing is 100% effective, especially military defenses and attacks. Were the protected sites heavily damaged, knocked out of action or suffered massive casualties?
Thanks, Peter. An interesting commentary from Ritter. I've wondered with these exchanges if each side is testing the response and capabilities of the other side. Perhaps.
Maybe Ira nw has nukes....
Lots of possibilities, none of them god for anyone...
https://open.substack.com/pub/tlavagabond/p/irans-response-against-israel-was?r=ykqw5&utm_medium=ios
Mr Scott supposed to be with judge Napolitano later https://www.youtube.com/live/Oefp-RK5Dto?si=L658VSPirA2VLjoN I watched Vanessa B on uk column this morning and later useful idiots with Aaron M. That was hilarious to watch. Trying to watch the grayzone https://www.youtube.com/live/MUNSOi2-dRE?si=xWl6dWllgNc1qhmL I saw a twt earlier that Israel is getting ready to attack back ?? … 🥴
Frm a few years ago:
https://theaviationist.com/2022/06/10/israel-claim-its-f-35is-can-now-reach-into-iran-without-air-to-air-refueling/
"The claims follow the latest exercises during which the IAF simulated a future strike against Iran’s nuclear sites."
"