6 Comments

Nothing is 100% effective, especially military defenses and attacks. Were the protected sites heavily damaged, knocked out of action or suffered massive casualties?

Expand full comment

Thanks, Peter. An interesting commentary from Ritter. I've wondered with these exchanges if each side is testing the response and capabilities of the other side. Perhaps.

Expand full comment
author

Maybe Ira nw has nukes....

Lots of possibilities, none of them god for anyone...

Expand full comment
Apr 15Liked by Peter Halligan

Mr Scott supposed to be with judge Napolitano later https://www.youtube.com/live/Oefp-RK5Dto?si=L658VSPirA2VLjoN I watched Vanessa B on uk column this morning and later useful idiots with Aaron M. That was hilarious to watch. Trying to watch the grayzone https://www.youtube.com/live/MUNSOi2-dRE?si=xWl6dWllgNc1qhmL I saw a twt earlier that Israel is getting ready to attack back ?? … 🥴

Expand full comment
author

Frm a few years ago:

https://theaviationist.com/2022/06/10/israel-claim-its-f-35is-can-now-reach-into-iran-without-air-to-air-refueling/

"The claims follow the latest exercises during which the IAF simulated a future strike against Iran’s nuclear sites."

"

Expand full comment