Amongst 30-39 year olds given C19 mRNA injections are 622 hospitalized and 1,349 taken to ER/ED to prevent a single ICU admission due to C19?
Earlier today, I posted this article:
The severity of the adverse events reported to various systems ranges widely from injection site soreness to death, so it is worthwhile getting to some sort of “apples to apples” comparison of adverse events resulting in hospitalization amongst those vaxxed, to compare directly with those sent to the ICU with C19.
Note that no account is taken of Under-Reporting Factors for adverse events from injections.
There is no data on the demographics within the Phase 3 clinical trial data for the C19 viral vector or mRNA injections. The UK used a lot of the Astra Zeneca viral vector injection, whereas the US almost exclusively used the mRNA injections from Pfizer and Moderna. So what follows is not quite “apples to apples” – more like “Braeburns to Golden Delicious”.
Having caveated the differences in usage of C19 injections, we do have much more data from the US as a result of the publication of V-Safe data amongst 10 million Americans here:
That article focussed on estimating the Under-Reporting Factor of VAERS, given the relative reporting to V-Safe compared to reporting to VAERS – it came up with a URF of around 60.
However, within that analysis are the percentages of people requiring an ER/ED visit (1.54% ) and Hospitalization ( 0.71%).
Armed with this information, we can apply the number of these serious adverse events of this type to the “Number Needed to Vaccinate” to prevent one ICU admission with C19 in the UK. (Not “apples with apples” as this is using US rates of injury and applying those to UK NNV’s).
Here is the UK base data (Table 4 extracted by Expose-News.com) – the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent a single ICU admission.
Here are the number of adverse events caused to prevent a single hospitalization
And here are tables showing the number of adverse events caused in the US that result in ER/ED visits or hospitalizations - as applied to these UK NNV’s
So, for example, given that it takes 87,600 people to get “vaccinated” to prevent a single ICU admission in the 30-39 year age cohort, using US V-Safe data, the “vaccinations” caused 1,349 visits to ER/ED for each single ICU admission with C19.
Again for the 30-39 year old age cohort, for each ICU admission claimed to be prevented by the “vaccinations”, using US V-Safe data there were 622 hospitalizations caused by the “vaccinations”.
For reference, here are some tables from the original post around the NNV’s and overall adverse events caused using only UK data as extracted by Expose-News.com from Table 4 - “NNV for prevention of severe hospitalization for different programmes”.
The adverse event numbers in the tables below for the UK are markedly lower than the incidence rates of adverse events reported to the V-Safe system compiled by the VAERSanalysis.info team and warrants much closer reconciliation and examination.
Unfortunately, the equivalent data from US V-Safe is not available in the UK.
The numbers in the tables below are simply the NNV’s divided by the 800 needed to prevent a single C19 case. (Pfizer is 990 and Moderna 662 - allegedly).
First overall:
From the above table, for example, for 30-39 year olds, there are 110 adverse events caused when preventing a single ICU admission in the UK. We do not have a breakdown of whether the injuries caused are “severe” (life altering) or “serious” (life threatening) though an ICU admission is likely to be “serious”.
The data is further broken down by risk group for the middle cohorts here:
For example, for the 40-49 year “No risk group” – the vast majority of 40-49 year olds – the NNV has increased from 234 for the initial double dose protocol – to 238 for the booster – all the way up to 1,166 adverse events (AESI’s) to prevent a single ICU admission.
Just to stress that AESI’s have varying degrees of severity or seriousness, it is NOT “apples and apples” to compare an AESI event to an ICU admission, since we do not know the severity/seriousness of either the AESI event or the ICU admission.
Here are the results from the Pfizer phase 3 clinical trials that indicate levels of “Severe” (life altering injuries at a rate of 1.2% and “Serious” (life threatening) injuries of 0.6%.
Somehow I doubt that the placebo group rates are as high as calculated by Pfizer’s clinical trial sub-contractors. This does not remotely resemble real life. It would make more sense to take a sample of the incidences of hospital visits amongst any 21,900 population base around the US with low C19 incidence and high incidence of C19 to come up with a placebo group – rather than trust Pfizer to come up with a number.
Calculations showed that it takes 990 Pfizer vaccinations to prevent a single C19 case, Moderna’s rate was around 662 – giving the average combined ratio of one case prevented for 800 people vaccinated. (Care is needed to nail down whether this is per dose or per double dose to achieve “vaccinated” status – if doses, these NNV figures may need to be doubled).
See here:
The COVID-19 Inoculations - More Harm Than Good FINAL Video & Print (canadiancovidcarealliance.org)
Each of the injected and placebo groups had around 21,900 subjects.
We need the breakdown by manufacturer to evaluate which has the worse outcomes.
At the 2 minute 10 mark of his video, Dr Campbell referred to each in his video in order to arrive at the one in 800 ratio – 15.1 per 10,000 for Moderna (one in 662 doses – not per vaccinated = two doses per course of initial protocol?) and 10.1 per 10,000 for Pfizer BioNTech (one in 990) to arrive at a one in 800 number for both. Note these results are ABOVE the placebo group.
I suggest that the information by manufacturer is being CRIMINALLY withheld by the regulators, since it denies INFORMED CONSENT (are the relative harms of 1/662 and 1/990 valid over the longer term rather than the truncated clinical trials (Pfizer’s trial was ended 30 November 2020 instead of 31 January 2021 from a 31 July 2020 start date).
Referring to the above table, here is a commentary in the Expose-News.com article
“For the covid vaccines, for healthy people aged 40-49, for example, 932,500 people would need an autumn booster in order to prevent a single intensive care admission. [In other words,] the chances of preventing an ICU admission were almost 1 in a million.”
Onwards!
I drink a lot of coffee – if you like my “stuff” but don’t want to pay for a subscription (that pays for food and internet!) buy me a cup to show (any!) appreciation here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan
Always happy to see NNV mentioned anywhere. Perhaps one day "public health" will rediscover that formerly elementary concept.
I did an extremely (!) conservative (think wildly, rainbow-eyed optimistic) calculation for kids in the USA here:
https://rome2ruins.substack.com/p/we-miserable-fools
I am not typically anti-vax nor anti-virus. They do exist. But not man-made. And the jab is just poison, not a real immune boost therapeutic. Until the evil ones prove the c19 virus exists, and then have to admit the jab isn’t an immune match, I’m out. The scam has a scam overtop of it. Wild goosechasing Dr’s lost, trying to help, while keeping fear alive even inadvertently...crazy...