Beyond the cost of suffering and death inflicted on the human race – ballparking the financial cost of the C19 scam unveils tens of trillions of dollars spent on the scam instead of hunger and disease

We have spent almost all our time looking at the harms of the initial response to the scamdemic and subsequent slaughter of the elderly with experimental injections of C19 spike venom.

From a global perspective, we should also look at the impact of the last four scamdemic years in terms of economic activity as measured by global gross domestic product.

This perspective quantifies the opportunity cost of the scamdemic on the well-being of the loves and lives of people had the cost of the scam, instead either NOT have been spent at all, or which could have been used to solve world hunger, poverty and diseases such as pneumonia and cancer.

These economic costs are a foreshadowing of the costs of the insane “Net Zero” plans for the planet based on similar scams, though “Net Zero” will cost humanity multiples of the C19 scam. Perhaps 5 times as much over the next 6 to 16 years – all based on “faux science”.

Those in the supranationals institutions charged with taking a global perspective do no such thing – they have a socialist/Marxist/Maoist perspective that I term the “Cult of Moloch”. It is a “one six fits all” approach that sacrifices the individual to the Borg – “Welcome to the Borg, Resistance is Futile, You will be Assimilated”.

Wouldn’t it be nice if organizations like the WEF and UN provided some sort of cost/benefit analysis – or maybe even the World Bank and IMF – fat chance, right?

Okay, rant mode engaged!

From here:

Global GDP 1985-2028 | Statista

Economic activity as measured by Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was 87.3 trillion bucks in 2019, dipped to 85.0 trillion in 2020, recovered to 96.5 trillion in 2021, increased again to 100.1 trillion in 2022 and is expected to be 104.5 trillion in 2023.

On the face of it, aside from 2020, global annual GDP has increased by 20% (17.3 trillion dollars) between 2019 and 2023. At the same time, the global population is up several hundred million people.

Amongst the vagaries of “measuring” GDP, an increase in government deficits is treated as a positive contribution to GDP – on the basis that it is injecting money into the economy.

Interest on government debt is part of the “G” component in the GDP = Consumption © plus Investment (I) plus Government (G) plus Exports – Imports (X-M) = GDP activity.

The same explicit assumption applies to interest on consumer debt and the interest cost associated with investment.

Let’s take a look at global debt in 2020.

From here:

Global Debt Reaches a Record $226 Trillion (imf.org)

“Global debt rose by 28 percentage points to 256 percent of GDP, in 2020, according to the latest update of the IMF’s Global Debt Database.

“In 2020, we observed the largest one-year debt surge since World War II, with global debt rising to $226 trillion…”

A 28% increase to 226 trillion represents an increase of 50 trillion bucks from 176 trillion in 2019,

Global 2020 GDP = 226 trillion divided by 256% = 88 trillion bucks.

Now, global debt would have increased had things proceeded as “normal” during 2020, without ay scamdemic. I am going to assume that sufficient opportunities for individuals and corporations would more than match those of the governments – so private sector debt up around 5% and government debt up 3% (average government fiscal deficit for 2020 without the scamdemic).

But that is not what happened – the planet got scammed – trillions of dollars were borrowed, most of it monetized by central banks, creating levels of inflation not seen since the 1970’s.

But let’s be conservative and say that of the 26% increase in global debt in 2020, a 6% increase in public and private sector debt would have occurred anyway and a better estimate of the C19 scamdemic impact on debt was 20% just in 2020 alone.

So, the increase in global debt due to the C19 scamdemic was 4/5 of 50 trillion bucks = 40 trillion bucks

An increase in 2020 global debt for the C19 scamdemic of 40 trillion bucks for a decrease in 2020 global GDP activity of somewhere between nothing and a contraction of 3 trillion bucks.

Sounds awful.

On to 2021, from the IMF’s “2022 GLOBAL DEBT MONITOR” we have this positive spin:

“Global debt fell 10 percentage points of GDP in 2021, the largest one-year fall in the last 70 years, to 247 percent of GDP. In U.S. dollars, global debt reached 235 trillion last year.”

Funny money!!! Global debt increases by 9 trillion bucks from 226 to 235 trillion but, because global GDP leapt from 88 trillion to (235/247%) 95 trillion bucks, its share of global GDP decreased!

What proportion of the increase in global debt was C19 scamdemic related in 2021? Let’s say it was down from 80% in 2020 to 25% in 2021 – so, around 2.25 trillion – call it 2 trillion for ease.

That’s a total for 2020 and 2021 of an increase in debt related to C19 only of 42 trillion bucks for growth in activity of 7 trillion bucks or less!

How about global debt in 2022?

“Global debt declined 10 percentage points of GDP and reached 238 percent of GDP in 2022. In U.S. dollars, global debt remained stable at USD 235 trillion.”

Zero change in global debt in 2022, Interesting, maybe it has something to do with the increase in the US trade weighted index from around 115.5 to 121.5 over the course of 2022 – a stronger US dollar means a lower value of non-US global debt. The more the US foes up, the more the value of foreign currency debt goes down – funny money!!!

Nominal Broad U.S. Dollar Index (DTWEXBGS) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)

Whilst global GDP increased to 98.7 trillion (235 trillion divided by 238%) - remember that 100 trillion global GDP number from the number taken from the Statista link right at the top of this article – the numbers are getting closer.

Global debt for 2023?

From another source (member only access – I am not a member) Global Debt Monitor (iif.com) A headline from a Bing search says:

“Global Debt Monitor - IIF7 Dec 2023 · November 16, 2023. Global debt reached a staggering $307 trillion in Q3 2023, with a big increase across the board in both mature markets (U.S., Japan, France, and the …”

Quite the leap from 235 trillion from the IMF source for 2022 – the odd 72 trillion bucks to 307 trillion bucks = +72 trillion dollars!!!! Maybe the IMF has better quality data? Funny money!

This kind of analysis can be done for individual countries, states, provinces, counties, cities and local authorities (even school boards and federal agencies).

From here, just for US government debt – not all debt that includes consumer, corporate, state, city and local debt – just the US government portion:

(100) Some notes on the USA’s continued trajectory into third world status – “odious debt” creation – consequences of spending like drunken sailors is INTEREST ON DEBT plus costs of migrant invasion (substack.com)

I pointed out a few things, such as the interest on US government debt of 34 trillion bucks at a cost of 5% = 1.7 trillion bucks a year – whilst discretionary spending was just 1.6 trillion bucks. That is, the interest on federal debt alone exceeds federal discretionary spending. In other words, the US Government cannot engage in ANY discretionary or supplemental spending without increasing debt.

 I showed this table:

And this one:

With maybe 25 trillion of GDP for 2022.

So, for the US, Federal debt from 2019 to 2022 has increased by 8 trillion bucks and GDP by (maybe) 4 trillion bucks.

For 2020 alone, US GDP DECLINED by 540 billion bucks whilst debt INCREASED by 5 trillion bucks.

That is an indication of the costs of the so called “Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions” (NPI’s) for 2020 specifically plus those NPI’s and Pharmaceutical Interventions (PI’s) for a few indications for subsequent years of 2021 and 2022.

A few global and US numbers that will be part of the numbers above - spread across the public and private sectors of the useless and harmful interventions over the full four years.

Remember, none of the NPI’s or PI’s achieved any benefits – only physical harms and financial costs.

All numbers are on a global basis.

Masks – assuming 75% of the world (6 billion people) masked up with at 100 masks a year (2 masks a week) for 2020 and 2021 plus 25% twice a week for 2022 (2 billion people) and 10% (800 million people) for 2023 = 600 billion plus 200 billion plus 80 billion = 880 billion masks – costing (for ease) a buck 25 cents on average each = ONE TRILLION DOLLARS!!

Tests – using data from here COVID - Coronavirus Statistics - Worldometer (worldometers.info) there have been 7 billion tests globally over the last four years – China, apparently, only administered 160 million!

Nonetheless, let’s stick with the 7 billion number of tests. How much per test?  From here:

Q&A: How much does it cost to get a COVID-19 test? It depends. - Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center (jhu.edu)

– median pricing of 127 previously, but now somewhere between 50 and 75 bucks. Let’s call it an average over the four years of 100 bucks. That’s SEVEN HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS for testing with all those false positives and negatives (95%?). That’s direct costs – how about indirect costs for hiring the nose swabbers, processing the results and storing them for posterity and analysis? Easily another 40 bucks per test, right? For a total of 140 bucks for another TRILLION BUCKS!

C19 injections – 13.7 billion doses costing what started out at around 25 bucks a dose but, in accordance with the usual price-gouging tactics of big pharms is between 150 and 200 bucks a dose for the latest monovalent. Call it an average of 30 bucks a dose plus the same 40 buck in indirect costs as for the testing. 70 bucks times 13.7 billion = ANOTHER TRILLION BUCKS!!!

Now add in all the other costs for protective gear, Perspex screens, gallons of paint for all those “circles on the ground” on sidewalks and bars etc. plus the gallons of cleaning fluid, and, in many countries, wet wipes, and all those spray and wipes in homes, subways, trains, buses, planes, cars and trucks. There’s many more NPI’s of this sort, but let’s call it ANOTHER TRILLION BUCKS!!!

The last trillion bucks excludes the slaughtering of the elderly using expensive drugs like Remdesivir and Midazolam plus cheaper morphine and fentanyl. It also excludes the manufacture of all those respirators with their >90% kill rate.

Now we have the grotesque spectacle of state funded C19 government enquiries seeking to protect politicians and bureaucrats from prosecution for allowing the wholesale slaughter of the elderly and the increasing number of the young.

All whilst NOT paying compensation to those seriously and severely harmed by the toxic ad useless experimental C19 mRNA and viral vector injections of spike venom. Bureaucracy hundreds of millions of bucks, so far, victims (tens of millions dead ad billions of adverse events globallY0 – double O, triple O, eff all, blank.

The numbers for the US are 670 million doses (70 bucks), 1.2 billion tests (140 bucks), 600 million marks ($1.25 each) + PPE, wet wipes, paint, Perspex etc.

That’s 47 billion + 168 billion + 750 million + sundries of (guessing) another 50 billion = around 260 billion bucks?

Again, compensation for deaths, serious ad severe events – nada. How much spent so far on court costs for all sorts of cases and all sorts of campaigns by the “freedom movement” to fund loss of jobs etc?

Lastly, lets talk about the E component of ESG – though the S and G bear scrutiny also.

What were the environmental costs of supplying all the packaging of the contents of vials, masks, tests? How about all the incremental transportation costs. Then, of course, there is the disposal of all the used masks, tests, vials, PPE, wet-wipes, Perspex, and so on and so forth. Some of it is hazardous waste that requires special incinerators – the US and EU alone has to dispose of close to a billion doses of unwanted vials. How much run-off into water systems of all those cleaning fluids.

These could easily cost trillions of bucks over the last 4 years. Anyone hear any chicken littles running around screeching about all these costs and environmental harms – there’s some ecocide right there!

Onwards!

Please subscribe or donate via Ko-fi – any amount from 3 bucks upwards. Don’t worry and God Bless, if you can’t or don’t want to. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 Ko-fi donation a week!