Can the C19 mRNA injection roll-out and its “Tragedy of Errors” be turned around to “Accentuate the Positives, Eliminate the Negatives”?

Depending on your political persuasion and faith in health care regulators interest in the health of the nation and “incorrupttibility”, you might believe

a)      that the 17,000 deaths reported to VAERS amongst 940,000 adverse events  for American residents over the last 27 months, is an over-reporting since these people either would have died or been injured anyway or were probably infected with C19 that caused their deaths amongst reported adverse events, (the CDC/FDA holds this view) – the under-reporting factor is zero, or

b)      that the 17,000 deaths amongst 940,000 adverse events reported to VAERS, represents a massive under-reporting and needs to be scaled up by an under-reporting factor of somewhere between 20 and 60 (much lower than the 100 of the Lazarus Report) – many experts hold this view see here:

Refresher on the Under Reporting Factor (URF) – The Giant Syringe in the Room (substack.com)

Europe’s VAERS equivalent system – EUDRA -has recorded over 50,000 deaths amongst 5.3 million adverse events from the administration of getting on for one billion doses administered. Indications are that the under-reporting factor for EUDRA may be closer to 70 than 40.

50,663 DEAD and 5,315,063 Injured Following COVID-19 Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions - Vaccine Impact

Views are diametrically opposed. One set of views supports an industry that has made hundreds of billions of dollars of annual profits in the last few years, promotes and funds the CDC/FDA/NIH/NAIAD complex and its research into gain of function – the other doesn’t. But let’s leave that aside.

What is not in dispute is the numbers of extra deaths since the pandemic began. These numbers are not adjusted for population changes, are “raw” and subject to revision – especially those for 2022.

Preliminary US mortality for 2022 indicates that around 560,000 more Americans are dying every year compared to 2018-2019 (substack.com)

Here is a representation (subject to updates) of the number of deaths for each of the last three calendar years (apologies to the SubStacker that posted this, I can’t find the link)).

Deaths in calendar year 2022 did not revert back to pre-C19 levels of 2017-2019. They remain elevated despite more or less the designation of “completed primary series” for 90% of adults by the CDC in the US.

Now, rather than focus on the lethal and damaging impact of C19 mRNA injections, let’s flip the narrative and see if we can accentuate the positive.

Even assuming an under-reporting factor of 40, of the 230 million Americans that have been classified as “completed primary series” and the 270 million that are “ever vaxxed” amongst around 670 million doses administered, in total, the majority are not reporting adverse events.

Which leads to the question,

“Are all those who have completed the primary series unaware of, or are tolerating, adverse events – or – have these people removed the toxins in the C19 mRNA injections by some means or do adverse events for some not impact the majority”?

Applying an under-reporting factor of 40, VAERS indicates around 38 million adverse events (of varying degrees of “seriousness” and “severity” and around 683,000 deaths, equivalent to around half of the extra deaths over 2021 and 2022.

Which leaves 192 million Americans that have completed the primary series who have not reported an adverse events or 232 million of the “ever vaxxed”.

How many of these around 200 million are carrying damage to vital organs and “soldiering on” and how many have cleansed their systems of, not only C19 infection, but also of the toxic mR\Na instructions, the lipid nano particles, the PEG, the graphene oxide and the contaminants from the shoddy manufacturing processes?

Maybe it’s all of them, maybe it’s none of them.

Since the number of deaths and adverse events, scaled with a URF of 40, easily qualifies as an equivalent to the C19  “public health emergency of international concern”(PHEIC) why not act as such and declare the use of injections a PHEIC?

We could ramp up diagnostics in every medical facility to detect the presence of harmful toxins in the blood and vital organs whilst building on the body of knowledge around miscarriages and still-births, lower motility and, importantly, monitor birth defects amongst newborns over the last two years AND intergenerational changes amongst descendants of the vaxxed.

How hard would it be to develop a an RT-PCR test or a RAT (that already tests for the “S” protein) using blood instead of mucous as a source material? How many pieces of equipment already exist that can detect organ damage – what is the gap to test everyone regularly, especially those at high risk from harms caused by the C19 mRNA injections – the obese, elderly and infirm? What research should be funded to detect and treat the different tocins?

Might it be that those who eat more genetically modified food – rice and soya – are more vulnerable or less vulnerable to adverse events and organ damage - or is the opposite true?

Might it be that certain states with low rates of adverse events have dietary or behaviours that cleanse their bodies of toxins more readily than others?

Food for thought – and detoxification!

Onwards!

Please subscribe, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan