Peter, your take on the renewables revolution is so obviously flawed that I had a good laugh, and another one when I checked the "climate change dispatch" article you link to.
It is always striking how utterly detached and clumsy the average critique of renewable energy has become. What would be so bad about you putting your need for projecting your negative feelings aside and start delving into facts the factual way, without an already made-up mind? I encourage you to start doing so.
I will "start doing so" when the renewables technology pays for itself and doesn't rely on creating energy poverty and tomorrow's rotting eyesores on land and sea, whilst using tax payer subsidies This price rigging via subsidies and taxation demonstrates just how hopelessly ineffective and expensive the existing renewables technology actually is.
Maybe you need to ask power bills in countries with massive "green" policies like those in the EU , Canada, Australia and UK are three-five times what they were last year and ten times what they were a decade ago - when fossil fuel prices have on average barely budged
To repeat, it is because fossil fuels are hyper-taxed and renewables are hyper-subsidized - throttling the exploration for more fossil fuels whilst taking over huge swathes of land. Look up how many acres of solar panels would be needed to provide for energy now, then factor in population growth.
Let me ask you a question - why did renewable electricity not eliminate the price spikes for electricity across the UK and Europe last year (hint, the cost of generating renewable energy did not change - the price gouging of racketeers in the renewable industry did).
Then I suggest you do your research on the "windmills" falling over, broken "windmills" blocking landfills, windmills requiring expensive maintenance to unfreeze during winter and "windmills" destroying bird life. Look up the raw materials in solar panels and their useful life. Follow that up with re-examining the eye-sores of acres of plantations of solar panels and their impact on the environment. Finish that research up with facts that with recent price action it costs more to travel 100 miles on electricity powered cars than ICE cars.
There will be a time when renewables will be viable - that time is not now.
Your logic is akin to assuming that Teslas were available in the 1920's - they weren't.
I encourage you to not just consider possibilities, but reality and facts. that do not fit your emotional need for a world that cannot yet exist.
There are way too many "eco warriors" around creating an increasingly negative reality of energy poverty and physical hardship.
The intelligence of these people was epitomized here:
So encourage me with reality not fantasies based on "green field", "blue sky" thinking.
There are large amounts of cold, dark and windless time period during the year when renewables cannot meet power needs - the battery technology needed to "plug the gap" needs to be at least ten times more efficient than is currently available.
Did you spot those facts and figures in the article? The numbers imply the need to at least triple taxes just to pay the interest on the debt needed to build out required battery capacity for current needs.
"So California will need about 22,302 GWH of storage, Australia about 18,720 GWH, and New York about 12,960 GWH. That is to supply current levels of demand.
For the “everything electrified” case, triple all of these numbers: 66,906 GWH for California, 56,160 GWH for Australia, and 38,880 GWH for New York.
Price that out at current costs of Tesla-type lithium-ion batteries (~$150/KWH) and you will get around $10 trillion for California, $8.4 trillion for Australia, and $5.8 trillion for New York.
These figures are in the range of triple total annual GDP for each of these jurisdictions, before you even get to the cost of the three-times overbuild of the generations system to account for charging of the batteries when the sun is shining and wind blowing."
The entire build out of current renewables infrastructure could be made obsolete with advances in fusion reactors or an as yet undiscovered or unharnessed fuel source (like tectonic plate or ocean current).
Current renewable technology will look incredibly dumb in a few years or a decade.
Peter, I notice a lot of anger in what you write. Anger is not a good counsel.
Granted, pretty much all of us have a need to express not only our positive emotions but also our negative ones. In such a setting, it's not even important what the "screen" really is upon which we project our negative emotions in order to be able to express them without endangering our social standing within the respective subgroup that we feel part of. Some take their emotions out on Jews or Whites, others on Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, straight or gay people, the opposite sex etc.
And some use "Renewable Energy" for projecting their negative emotions. Fact only become an annoyance when it gets to this point. Which is why you present "alternative facts", mired in a distant past that has long ceased to be relevant.
The German language has some quite catchy terms, and there is one for this phenomenon, too: "Ewiggestrig", literally: eternally mired in the past". It is meant for people who stubbornly stick to long gone aspects of the distant past for the mere reason that this seems to serve their emotional needs better than today's reality that surrounds us all.
Now I am not quite as optimistic as to think you might be ready to see this in yourself yet. Only when you find a way to deal with your negative emotions in a more sincere, direct way will you be ready to let go of your favourite projection screen for negative emotions, which Renewable Energy currently is. I do wish you all the best though to eventually overcome this.
I think they just tell us that they are letting us vote these days. As Stalin said, what is not so important is who votes and how they vote, what is more important is who counts the votes and how they count them.
Thank you for an excellent insight into the whole scam. Way bigger than the injection fraud indeed.
Time for a world wide revolution. Depose the rotten structures of all governments & remove every single one of the fraudulent initialed institutions of bullshittery.
The difference with Dowds approach is he gives no conclusion, he just points out in detail the all case mortality is way way above what the actuaries expected. So the question is simply why are these excess deaths here?
So the reader slowly comes to the only conclusion available, the Vax
I would look further into the idea that the vaccine is more dangerous due to quality control. This seems not to be true from my studies. The vaccine where manufactured to specification causes more death and injury than the lots that are not.
Also go to rumble.com and look for the TPC podcast with Dr McCullough. He points out the vax platform had been invented in 2012 and that is not what the EUA was about. EUA was about experimenting on Humans even though the vaccine could never pass FDA trials.
Further, Jane Ruby has a podcast with Mr Weeb I think his name is. He talks about how Robert Malone isnt who we think, how the DOD fits in. Very interesting.
Do you have a link to the podcast talking about Dr Malone? I am intrigued and have heard this allegation numerous times, but don't get a sense of this at all when listening to him, or reading his substack. I have to say that I am suspicious of these claims against Dr Malone without any "hard" evidence.
Yes, many many powerful people would just love to get Dr. Malone gone. But his combination of intelligence, experience, and personal integrity is difficult for them to demonize. I find him one of the most trustworthy sources of information I've been able to discover.
Now, one thing I thought was sometimes someone will just get too rattled and do a 180. It still could be that Malone is not what they say. But the evidence is staking against him in my view.
I'm dubious about Malone also. First clue: he said on Weinstein interview he'd taken the jab which seemed unlikely to me given his knowledge of mRNA vaccine technology. That said, I'm dubious about this Webb guy also, on first name basis with "Bob Malone" and who somehow manages to crash confidential meetings. Also dubious about Jane Ruby. She's gotta be in her mid-50s at least but presents herself dolled up to the nines, false nails, low cleavage, suggestive introductory music ... Mind you, she's revealed lots of important stuff - blood clots in particular. But for me she's there basically to make money.
Agreed. I have been following Hadley Rees for a while and watched another Bitchute video that goes into some detail. Sasha Latypova did some joint interviews with Hadley a month or so ago.
it all means that big pharma (and its 50 or so contributors to the supply chain that finally ends up in a vial) not only fraudulently conducted trials but also broke these laws making their offerings invalid
I think one thing "we" need to do is sell. We have the evidence we need no more. Things like sending a few hundred Ed Dowd books to each Senator. Send a copy to your local sheriff. Ask them who killed all these people? Can you help?
The idea of sending the book to each Dem is we need a few. I am sure more than a few have lost family members. I noticed these doctors dont wake up unless a family member is killed.
Maybe he can arrange for free copies of the relevant books. There are so many now, by lots of people Kennedy Jr, Turtles all the way down (Anonymous) Malone, McCullough - Kory's book is overdue (War on Ivermectin). Daily Clout has a book out. So many.
The idea of asking if your local sheriff has read any books is a good one. Many have probably either been injured or know someone who has (and maybe died too). Could just wander in and ask, or phone.
I am not State side. I am in London right now. Can't enter the US unless injected - which I will not do. The UK police have logged complaints from the public
I went to Kyrenia prior to partition. I have been to Indonesia several times but only the airport in Manila. Most of my travel has been to sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean, around Europe and Australia - lived in NZ for a decade and Chicago for several years. Wandered around Singapore and Hong Kong for a week or two.
The journey has been as important to me as the destination, but, of course, "the fun has been sucked" out of that post 9/11 and shoe-bombers etc. Still remember joining the flight deck to watch sunrises and sunsets and landings! Happy days.
Went to Tunisia for a few weeks - it rained! haha.
Peter, your take on the renewables revolution is so obviously flawed that I had a good laugh, and another one when I checked the "climate change dispatch" article you link to.
It is always striking how utterly detached and clumsy the average critique of renewable energy has become. What would be so bad about you putting your need for projecting your negative feelings aside and start delving into facts the factual way, without an already made-up mind? I encourage you to start doing so.
I will "start doing so" when the renewables technology pays for itself and doesn't rely on creating energy poverty and tomorrow's rotting eyesores on land and sea, whilst using tax payer subsidies This price rigging via subsidies and taxation demonstrates just how hopelessly ineffective and expensive the existing renewables technology actually is.
Maybe you need to ask power bills in countries with massive "green" policies like those in the EU , Canada, Australia and UK are three-five times what they were last year and ten times what they were a decade ago - when fossil fuel prices have on average barely budged
To repeat, it is because fossil fuels are hyper-taxed and renewables are hyper-subsidized - throttling the exploration for more fossil fuels whilst taking over huge swathes of land. Look up how many acres of solar panels would be needed to provide for energy now, then factor in population growth.
Let me ask you a question - why did renewable electricity not eliminate the price spikes for electricity across the UK and Europe last year (hint, the cost of generating renewable energy did not change - the price gouging of racketeers in the renewable industry did).
Then I suggest you do your research on the "windmills" falling over, broken "windmills" blocking landfills, windmills requiring expensive maintenance to unfreeze during winter and "windmills" destroying bird life. Look up the raw materials in solar panels and their useful life. Follow that up with re-examining the eye-sores of acres of plantations of solar panels and their impact on the environment. Finish that research up with facts that with recent price action it costs more to travel 100 miles on electricity powered cars than ICE cars.
There will be a time when renewables will be viable - that time is not now.
Your logic is akin to assuming that Teslas were available in the 1920's - they weren't.
I encourage you to not just consider possibilities, but reality and facts. that do not fit your emotional need for a world that cannot yet exist.
There are way too many "eco warriors" around creating an increasingly negative reality of energy poverty and physical hardship.
The intelligence of these people was epitomized here:
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/hahaha-this-is-what-passes-for-intelligence amongst eco-warriors. Imagine if they were actually in charge of, well, anything of importance!!!
So encourage me with reality not fantasies based on "green field", "blue sky" thinking.
There are large amounts of cold, dark and windless time period during the year when renewables cannot meet power needs - the battery technology needed to "plug the gap" needs to be at least ten times more efficient than is currently available.
Did you spot those facts and figures in the article? The numbers imply the need to at least triple taxes just to pay the interest on the debt needed to build out required battery capacity for current needs.
https://climatechangedispatch.com/the-people-promising-us-net-zero-are-clueless-about-energy-storage/
I will show an excerpt in case you didn't
"So California will need about 22,302 GWH of storage, Australia about 18,720 GWH, and New York about 12,960 GWH. That is to supply current levels of demand.
For the “everything electrified” case, triple all of these numbers: 66,906 GWH for California, 56,160 GWH for Australia, and 38,880 GWH for New York.
Price that out at current costs of Tesla-type lithium-ion batteries (~$150/KWH) and you will get around $10 trillion for California, $8.4 trillion for Australia, and $5.8 trillion for New York.
These figures are in the range of triple total annual GDP for each of these jurisdictions, before you even get to the cost of the three-times overbuild of the generations system to account for charging of the batteries when the sun is shining and wind blowing."
The entire build out of current renewables infrastructure could be made obsolete with advances in fusion reactors or an as yet undiscovered or unharnessed fuel source (like tectonic plate or ocean current).
Current renewable technology will look incredibly dumb in a few years or a decade.
Peter, I notice a lot of anger in what you write. Anger is not a good counsel.
Granted, pretty much all of us have a need to express not only our positive emotions but also our negative ones. In such a setting, it's not even important what the "screen" really is upon which we project our negative emotions in order to be able to express them without endangering our social standing within the respective subgroup that we feel part of. Some take their emotions out on Jews or Whites, others on Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, straight or gay people, the opposite sex etc.
And some use "Renewable Energy" for projecting their negative emotions. Fact only become an annoyance when it gets to this point. Which is why you present "alternative facts", mired in a distant past that has long ceased to be relevant.
The German language has some quite catchy terms, and there is one for this phenomenon, too: "Ewiggestrig", literally: eternally mired in the past". It is meant for people who stubbornly stick to long gone aspects of the distant past for the mere reason that this seems to serve their emotional needs better than today's reality that surrounds us all.
Now I am not quite as optimistic as to think you might be ready to see this in yourself yet. Only when you find a way to deal with your negative emotions in a more sincere, direct way will you be ready to let go of your favourite projection screen for negative emotions, which Renewable Energy currently is. I do wish you all the best though to eventually overcome this.
Wish you all the best! Matt
You too. Though you really should look up the German term for "projecting" your own emotions onto others.
I posted an article today that posts some unemotional objective facts that your emotions do not let you see.
I think they just tell us that they are letting us vote these days. As Stalin said, what is not so important is who votes and how they vote, what is more important is who counts the votes and how they count them.
Spot on!
Thank you for an excellent insight into the whole scam. Way bigger than the injection fraud indeed.
Time for a world wide revolution. Depose the rotten structures of all governments & remove every single one of the fraudulent initialed institutions of bullshittery.
Cool! ...um...how exactly?
Start at town, village level by asking local councilors to explain what have they done to improve the community's lives.
Expand that to county & state level. Pressuring them before they try to lock us all up again.
If & when as they surely will try the lockdown bs again.
Defy them. Ignore their illegal laws.
If you look around here on substack you'll find the legal forms required to preempt any actions against you & your family.
Well put!
Yes, that is Ed Dowd.
The difference with Dowds approach is he gives no conclusion, he just points out in detail the all case mortality is way way above what the actuaries expected. So the question is simply why are these excess deaths here?
So the reader slowly comes to the only conclusion available, the Vax
Or like gates and now amnesty international and un wants to bring abortion “help” to these dev countries
Totally agree!
Very nice write up.
I would look further into the idea that the vaccine is more dangerous due to quality control. This seems not to be true from my studies. The vaccine where manufactured to specification causes more death and injury than the lots that are not.
Also go to rumble.com and look for the TPC podcast with Dr McCullough. He points out the vax platform had been invented in 2012 and that is not what the EUA was about. EUA was about experimenting on Humans even though the vaccine could never pass FDA trials.
Further, Jane Ruby has a podcast with Mr Weeb I think his name is. He talks about how Robert Malone isnt who we think, how the DOD fits in. Very interesting.
Its not a vaccine. Its a goddam evil bioweapon. Sorry, words matter a lot these days!
Do you have a link to the podcast talking about Dr Malone? I am intrigued and have heard this allegation numerous times, but don't get a sense of this at all when listening to him, or reading his substack. I have to say that I am suspicious of these claims against Dr Malone without any "hard" evidence.
Yes, many many powerful people would just love to get Dr. Malone gone. But his combination of intelligence, experience, and personal integrity is difficult for them to demonize. I find him one of the most trustworthy sources of information I've been able to discover.
Here you go....
https://rumble.com/v26f5we-live-7pm-legalized-murder-prep-act-big-tobacco-and-robert-malone.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2
The Journalist has the receipts.
Now, one thing I thought was sometimes someone will just get too rattled and do a 180. It still could be that Malone is not what they say. But the evidence is staking against him in my view.
I'm dubious about Malone also. First clue: he said on Weinstein interview he'd taken the jab which seemed unlikely to me given his knowledge of mRNA vaccine technology. That said, I'm dubious about this Webb guy also, on first name basis with "Bob Malone" and who somehow manages to crash confidential meetings. Also dubious about Jane Ruby. She's gotta be in her mid-50s at least but presents herself dolled up to the nines, false nails, low cleavage, suggestive introductory music ... Mind you, she's revealed lots of important stuff - blood clots in particular. But for me she's there basically to make money.
Agreed. I have been following Hadley Rees for a while and watched another Bitchute video that goes into some detail. Sasha Latypova did some joint interviews with Hadley a month or so ago.
Hadley Rees substack here https://hedleyrees.substack.com/
That bitchute video here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1MG7hHpprd9P/
plus jikkyleaks has been all over this on twitter (amongst many other C19 issues).
https://twitter.com/jikkyleaks
it all means that big pharma (and its 50 or so contributors to the supply chain that finally ends up in a vial) not only fraudulently conducted trials but also broke these laws making their offerings invalid
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/how-many-breaches-of-section-21-us
the issue is "how do we know if anyone is actually prosecuting any/all of this!!!???"
I think one thing "we" need to do is sell. We have the evidence we need no more. Things like sending a few hundred Ed Dowd books to each Senator. Send a copy to your local sheriff. Ask them who killed all these people? Can you help?
The idea of sending the book to each Dem is we need a few. I am sure more than a few have lost family members. I noticed these doctors dont wake up unless a family member is killed.
We have to sell this. Sell sell sell
Good ideas. It may be that Ed Dowd is on Gettr (I am not a user) here https://app.gettr.com/user/edwarddowd
Maybe he can arrange for free copies of the relevant books. There are so many now, by lots of people Kennedy Jr, Turtles all the way down (Anonymous) Malone, McCullough - Kory's book is overdue (War on Ivermectin). Daily Clout has a book out. So many.
The idea of asking if your local sheriff has read any books is a good one. Many have probably either been injured or know someone who has (and maybe died too). Could just wander in and ask, or phone.
I am not State side. I am in London right now. Can't enter the US unless injected - which I will not do. The UK police have logged complaints from the public
https://expose-news.com/2022/06/15/complaints-about-police-conduct-are-ignored-by-iopc/
"Update CRN 6029679/21: Complaints Regarding Police Conduct are Ignored by IOPC and Metropolitan Police Federation
BY RHODA WILSON ON JUNE 15, 2022 "
I went to Kyrenia prior to partition. I have been to Indonesia several times but only the airport in Manila. Most of my travel has been to sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean, around Europe and Australia - lived in NZ for a decade and Chicago for several years. Wandered around Singapore and Hong Kong for a week or two.
The journey has been as important to me as the destination, but, of course, "the fun has been sucked" out of that post 9/11 and shoe-bombers etc. Still remember joining the flight deck to watch sunrises and sunsets and landings! Happy days.
Went to Tunisia for a few weeks - it rained! haha.
wow. good stuff. all the best to you too.