I am very grateful for your interest and to be the patriot human you are. There are two court conviction cases already that were/are submitted as evidence in the Illinois 7th district and the Wyoming 7th district (November 1 still refused to file a case number by the clerk) and what must be done is to resubmit the case with ALL CURRENTLY KNOWN EVIDENCE. We do not need or want a lawyer because pro-se status grants more leeway of the rules and procedure. (We would however possibly use an "attorney" Once the court grants discovery as the court may wish or demand) however the "people" have and are the "power" when corruption must be removed. I BELIEVE to file in the Wyoming Supreme Court is the next step and more importantly is to get as many Valid Plaintiffs behind the cause and that should get a court to rule that the "Vaccines" or DOD counter measures to be publicly published as a POISON as documents prove. This has completely destroyed my business, my family and my future. I'm at my wits end . Your words of encouragement are helpful but honestly I don't think I can organize it to refile this by my self. Fortunately they have not evicted my mom yet but it's a matter of time until they will unless the public pressure makes the court act.
This might wake some people up that don't believe me when I say that your thoughts and who you vote for is being injected in everything and everyone for the internet of bodies or Homo Borg Genius. It's NEVER BEEN ABOUT YOUR HEALTH!!!
Magnificent response to the outrageous opinion of the court-we all owe you our eternal gratitude.But,Paul, respectfully, watch your spelling and punctuation, please.
I would love to have assistance, unfortunately NOBODY RESPONDS TO REQUESTED HELP.
NOT EVEN TO SAVE THEIR OWN LIVES.
MR. WINNER, I BELIEVE IN DOING IT RIGHT BUT SOMETIMES DETAILS ARE INADVERTENTLY OVERLOOKED WHEN YOU WORK ALONE. PLEASE VISIT MY SUBSTACK, FOR FREE, EVEN TO COMMENT, UNLIKE THE MAJORITY OF SUBSTACKERS.
I owe you an apology, for my seeming bluntness. What I wrote should have been couched in terms which were less critical in my choice of words. What you have done and tried to do is and was simply monumental. Your knowledge base of law, jurisprudence, and the history of both is incredible.And surmounting all is your patriotic zeal to preserve and defend our Constitution from attack by those on the “inside “. The slight discrepancies in spelling and punctuation were minor and evanescent, and it was in poor taste that I even mentioned them.
This is the first time that I’ve seen and read your work. How may I possibly help you in your efforts, in addition to donating an appropriate fee for a subscription to your blog- and what is the fee?
Will you reformulate your work and re-submit, or...?
One thing to keep in mind, the case is for the "conspiracy to deprive American Republic CITIZENS of God given Constitutional Rights, torture , maime and premeditated murder and many RICO violations, all result in death. " kind of . We are attacking the conspiracy involving from our birth till death . To UNLAWFULLY convert living souls into Dead corporate entities for the interest of the Crown of England and the Vatican. All documented and Unlawful INLAND PIRACY!
Mr. Winner , dang that has a nice ring to it. Sir, I am against charging for information in a situation where all men women and children are at global war with the "U.S. , DOD"etal, however the one tool that we could make wonderful use of is the course called "how to win in court" I can not afford it because I have been spending money on my mothers medication to detox from "The Root Brands.com, the Trinity pack" because she doesn't deserve this torture. Unfortunately office supplies are not free and the opposition against me has been overwhelming to say the least. Again I truly appreciate your helpful response and acknowledgement of this struggle.
My business had 26 employees nation wide prior to the lie of Covid. I have been Blocked on every single social media platform. My entire family thinks I am crazy. Mermaid-Engineering.com is my website but Google has pretty much destroyed my business.
Federal law requires the automatic disqualification of a federal judge under certain circumstances.
In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that "Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge's impartiality. If a judge's attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified. " [Emphasis added]. Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994).
Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) (what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance); United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) (Section 455(a) "is directed against the appearance of partiality, whether or not the judge is actually biased.") ("Section 455(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. §455(a), is not intended to protect litigants from actual bias in their judge but rather to promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process.").
That Court also stated that Section 455(a) "requires a judge to recuse himself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably be questioned." Taylor v. O'Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989). In Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972), the Court stated that "It is important that the litigant not only actually receive justice, but that he believes that he has received justice."
No man/woman would believe Crimes against Humanity is Lawful. !!!!!!
The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that "justice must satisfy the appearance of justice", Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954). A judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he is presiding, does not give the appearance of justice.
"Recusal under Section 455 is self-executing; a party need not file affidavits in support of recusal and the judge is obligated to recuse herself sua sponte under the stated circumstances. " Taylor v. O'Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989).
Further, the judge has a legal duty to disqualify himself even if there is no motion asking for his disqualification. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals further stated that "We think that this language [455(a)] imposes a duty on the judge to act sua sponte, even if no motion or affidavit is filed." Balistrieri, at 1202.
Judges do not have discretion not to disqualify themselves. By law, they are bound to follow the law. Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has given another example of his "appearance of partiality" which, possibly, further disqualifies the judge. Should another judge not accept the disqualification of the judge, then the second judge has evidenced an "appearance of partiality" and has possibly disqualified himself/herself. None of the orders issued by any judge who has been disqualified by law would appear to be valid. It would appear that they are void as a matter of law and are of no legal force or effect.
Should a judge not disqualify himself, then the judge is in violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) ("The right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause.").
Should a judge issue any order after he has been disqualified by law, and if the party has been denied of any of his / her property, then the judge may have been engaged in the Federal Crime of "interference with interstate commerce". The judge has acted in the judge's personal capacity and not in the judge's judicial capacity. It has been said that this judge, acting in this manner, has no more lawful authority than someone's next-door neighbor (provided that he is not a judge). However, some judges may not follow the law.
If you were a non-represented litigant, and should the court not follow the law as to non-represented litigants, then the judge has expressed an "appearance of partiality" and, under the law, it would seem that he/she has disqualified him/herself.
The USSC HAS “AUTOMATICALY DISQUALIFIED” LAWFLY when it refused to adjudicate the 2020 election results . Therefore the RESPONDENT maintains all court rulings are void from this fiction Corporation that fraudulently claims to be a Federal Court of Law. WE DO NOT CONCENT TO ANY RULING MADE BY ANY corrupt COURT .
However, since not all judges keep up to date in the law, and since not all judges follow the law, it is possible that a judge may not know the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court and the other courts on this subject. Notice that it states, "disqualification is required" and that a judge "must be disqualified" under certain circumstances.
The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he acts without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason and may be engaged in extortion and the interference with interstate commerce.
Courts have repeatedly ruled that judges have no immunity for their criminal acts. Since both treason and the interference with interstate commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.
Courts sometimes hold laws to a higher standard than a “rational basis.” Under decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court, which are authoritative as to the federal guarantees and serve as guides for the Illinois guarantees, at least two kinds of laws are held to a much high- er standard: those that (1) interfere with a “fundamental right” such as freedom of expression, voting, decisions about reproduction, or interstate travel, or (2) discriminate on the basis of a “suspect classification” such as race, ancestry, or (under the 1970 Illinois Constitution) sex.17 Both federal and Illinois decisions require such laws to have a “compelling govern- mental purpose” to be upheld.
The antonym to Sovereign is Subservience, the people in the court or on the street are NOT subservient to a service agent of a corporation currently operated by domestic enemies of I Man/We The People. You took an Oath that you have failed to honor. You are a disgrace to the Robe you pretend to serve the people in. I Do NOT Consent to ANY “services” of THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT. If the State or Federal Court Fails to address CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, CASE 21-2728 IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT, then this 10th circuit Court has NO STANDING, Jurisdiction or Authority.
I, Paul R. Wilkerson, am a sovereign man. I am before this Court by “Special Appearance”, without waiving any rights, remedies, or defenses, protected by the Illinois or UNITED STATES Constitutions and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. I refute any ORDER under this court and REFUSE TO CONSENT TO THE JUDGEMENT IN THE ABOVE CASE #. 42 USC SEC 659 (i)(4). I object to being referred to as a “straw man” ie PAUL RICHARD WILKERSON. I AM A LIVING BEING, A MAN, OF FLESH AND BLOOD. I am in the state of MAN. I am NOT an Entity such as a corporation, Trust or Person. PAUL RICHARD WILKERSON is NOT my name. My name is Paul Richard Wilkerson spelled with upper- AND lower-case symbols used in the English language. When this Plaintiff and this Court spelled (FRAUD ON THE COURT) in all capital letters they attempted to change my status from a living Man to a Dead Entity 28 USC SEC 3002 (10) “Person” includes a natural person (including an individual Indian), a corporation, a partnership, an unincorporated association, a trust, an estate or any other public or private entity, including a State or local government or an Indian tribe. See ATTACHED Duplicate, STANDARD CIRTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH DATED AUG. 29, 1973 (filed 06/09/1965). Also see STATE OF WYOMING, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH, STATE FILE #149-1965-002555 DATED Aug. 4-2021. That is a TRESPASS!
With origins buried deep in the annals of procedural history, there is a common law writ known as the
writ of error.
The purpose of this writ is not to authorize a court to review its opinion, but only to vacate some adjudication made, and should the error alleged be in the judgment itself, then remedial action must be sought through appeal or writ of error.
The writ of error coram nobis is strictly a common law writ and does not issue out of a court of chancery but circumstances amounting to extrinsic fraud, where the court assumed non-existent facts ( big PHARMA helps people, untested nano technology medical devices are vaccines, History is irrelevant, CRISPER technology is healthy, People Serve the Government, LAW does NOT apply to BAR members, "people are too small minded to run their own affairs", EUA is Legal, Alternative medicine is illegal, Freedom is only for the rich, vaccines are safe, PCR testing works, DEAD BODIES do Not smell, Fauchi has never lied, the FDA, CIA, DARPA, NSA, IRS, HHS, DNC, FBI, WHO, CNN, FOX, CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, BBC,CCP ect. don't LIE...., masks don't restrict oxygen to dangerous levels in seconds, the Constitution does not apply, insider trading is Lawful, Oath of office is just a suggestion, 5G is safe, open boarders are legal, child trafficking, rape, organ harvesting, and murder are fine, crimes against humanity is legal if you are rich, money is free, Billions of people want to die or be slaves for the good of the "community", they wouldn't dare force POISION on a Judge) absence of which entirely defeats jurisdiction, void the decisions of the court.
For argument against the writ being barred by laches, note, 59 YALE L.J. 792, N. 28 (1949).
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
But this case is very different. United States is not trying to fire anyone.
Instead, the company is trying to murder its employees obtain the COVID-19 vaccine, notwithstanding any objections they might have.
Forcing individuals to choose between their faith and their livelihood imposes an obvious and substantial burden on religion, and life.
Make no mistake: Vaccine mandates like the one United States is attempting to impose here present a crisis of conscience for many people of faith. It forces them to choose between the two most profound obligations they will ever assume—holding true to their religious commitments, life, and feeding and housing their children.
WHO will control and bleed you dry before they actually kill everyone.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gA3rIGeb3UTD/
Please watch this one
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fBWJ7Jn8s9EP/
I am very grateful for your interest and to be the patriot human you are. There are two court conviction cases already that were/are submitted as evidence in the Illinois 7th district and the Wyoming 7th district (November 1 still refused to file a case number by the clerk) and what must be done is to resubmit the case with ALL CURRENTLY KNOWN EVIDENCE. We do not need or want a lawyer because pro-se status grants more leeway of the rules and procedure. (We would however possibly use an "attorney" Once the court grants discovery as the court may wish or demand) however the "people" have and are the "power" when corruption must be removed. I BELIEVE to file in the Wyoming Supreme Court is the next step and more importantly is to get as many Valid Plaintiffs behind the cause and that should get a court to rule that the "Vaccines" or DOD counter measures to be publicly published as a POISON as documents prove. This has completely destroyed my business, my family and my future. I'm at my wits end . Your words of encouragement are helpful but honestly I don't think I can organize it to refile this by my self. Fortunately they have not evicted my mom yet but it's a matter of time until they will unless the public pressure makes the court act.
God bless you.
I am so sorry for your toubles.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fBWJ7Jn8s9EP/
It is Our trouble and you can help.
This might wake some people up that don't believe me when I say that your thoughts and who you vote for is being injected in everything and everyone for the internet of bodies or Homo Borg Genius. It's NEVER BEEN ABOUT YOUR HEALTH!!!
DARPA's Pursuit of Mind Control
DARPA's Pursuit of Mind Control
Archive video.
https://www.bitdchute.com/video/SAzP0Ivu1BLl/
MILITARY CONFIRMS 5G CAUSES COVID.....
MILITARY CONFIRMS 5G CAUSES COVID.....
https://drtrozzi.org/2023/01/04/court-ordered-injections-a-dangerous-precedent/
https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:aeed7e46-e84e-3b90-90e2-925a081b4d15
American bioterrorism program
https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:f53f1136-5ade-3c7e-8946-cc196fca1675/
Magnificent response to the outrageous opinion of the court-we all owe you our eternal gratitude.But,Paul, respectfully, watch your spelling and punctuation, please.
I would love to have assistance, unfortunately NOBODY RESPONDS TO REQUESTED HELP.
NOT EVEN TO SAVE THEIR OWN LIVES.
MR. WINNER, I BELIEVE IN DOING IT RIGHT BUT SOMETIMES DETAILS ARE INADVERTENTLY OVERLOOKED WHEN YOU WORK ALONE. PLEASE VISIT MY SUBSTACK, FOR FREE, EVEN TO COMMENT, UNLIKE THE MAJORITY OF SUBSTACKERS.
I owe you an apology, for my seeming bluntness. What I wrote should have been couched in terms which were less critical in my choice of words. What you have done and tried to do is and was simply monumental. Your knowledge base of law, jurisprudence, and the history of both is incredible.And surmounting all is your patriotic zeal to preserve and defend our Constitution from attack by those on the “inside “. The slight discrepancies in spelling and punctuation were minor and evanescent, and it was in poor taste that I even mentioned them.
This is the first time that I’ve seen and read your work. How may I possibly help you in your efforts, in addition to donating an appropriate fee for a subscription to your blog- and what is the fee?
Will you reformulate your work and re-submit, or...?
Thank you.
One thing to keep in mind, the case is for the "conspiracy to deprive American Republic CITIZENS of God given Constitutional Rights, torture , maime and premeditated murder and many RICO violations, all result in death. " kind of . We are attacking the conspiracy involving from our birth till death . To UNLAWFULLY convert living souls into Dead corporate entities for the interest of the Crown of England and the Vatican. All documented and Unlawful INLAND PIRACY!
HUMAN TRAFFICKING!
Mr. Winner , dang that has a nice ring to it. Sir, I am against charging for information in a situation where all men women and children are at global war with the "U.S. , DOD"etal, however the one tool that we could make wonderful use of is the course called "how to win in court" I can not afford it because I have been spending money on my mothers medication to detox from "The Root Brands.com, the Trinity pack" because she doesn't deserve this torture. Unfortunately office supplies are not free and the opposition against me has been overwhelming to say the least. Again I truly appreciate your helpful response and acknowledgement of this struggle.
God bless you and your family sir.
My business had 26 employees nation wide prior to the lie of Covid. I have been Blocked on every single social media platform. My entire family thinks I am crazy. Mermaid-Engineering.com is my website but Google has pretty much destroyed my business.
Federal law requires the automatic disqualification of a federal judge under certain circumstances.
In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that "Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge's impartiality. If a judge's attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified. " [Emphasis added]. Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994).
Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) (what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance); United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) (Section 455(a) "is directed against the appearance of partiality, whether or not the judge is actually biased.") ("Section 455(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. §455(a), is not intended to protect litigants from actual bias in their judge but rather to promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process.").
That Court also stated that Section 455(a) "requires a judge to recuse himself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably be questioned." Taylor v. O'Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989). In Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972), the Court stated that "It is important that the litigant not only actually receive justice, but that he believes that he has received justice."
No man/woman would believe Crimes against Humanity is Lawful. !!!!!!
The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that "justice must satisfy the appearance of justice", Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954). A judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he is presiding, does not give the appearance of justice.
"Recusal under Section 455 is self-executing; a party need not file affidavits in support of recusal and the judge is obligated to recuse herself sua sponte under the stated circumstances. " Taylor v. O'Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989).
Further, the judge has a legal duty to disqualify himself even if there is no motion asking for his disqualification. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals further stated that "We think that this language [455(a)] imposes a duty on the judge to act sua sponte, even if no motion or affidavit is filed." Balistrieri, at 1202.
Judges do not have discretion not to disqualify themselves. By law, they are bound to follow the law. Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has given another example of his "appearance of partiality" which, possibly, further disqualifies the judge. Should another judge not accept the disqualification of the judge, then the second judge has evidenced an "appearance of partiality" and has possibly disqualified himself/herself. None of the orders issued by any judge who has been disqualified by law would appear to be valid. It would appear that they are void as a matter of law and are of no legal force or effect.
Should a judge not disqualify himself, then the judge is in violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) ("The right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause.").
Should a judge issue any order after he has been disqualified by law, and if the party has been denied of any of his / her property, then the judge may have been engaged in the Federal Crime of "interference with interstate commerce". The judge has acted in the judge's personal capacity and not in the judge's judicial capacity. It has been said that this judge, acting in this manner, has no more lawful authority than someone's next-door neighbor (provided that he is not a judge). However, some judges may not follow the law.
If you were a non-represented litigant, and should the court not follow the law as to non-represented litigants, then the judge has expressed an "appearance of partiality" and, under the law, it would seem that he/she has disqualified him/herself.
Please note that the Attorney General of Illinois works for the crown of England.
https://illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/about/history.html
Therefore the judgment of any court run by a foreign Corporation is a complete violation and NUL AND VOID of Jurisdictional foundation or Authority.
The USSC HAS “AUTOMATICALY DISQUALIFIED” LAWFLY when it refused to adjudicate the 2020 election results . Therefore the RESPONDENT maintains all court rulings are void from this fiction Corporation that fraudulently claims to be a Federal Court of Law. WE DO NOT CONCENT TO ANY RULING MADE BY ANY corrupt COURT .
However, since not all judges keep up to date in the law, and since not all judges follow the law, it is possible that a judge may not know the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court and the other courts on this subject. Notice that it states, "disqualification is required" and that a judge "must be disqualified" under certain circumstances.
The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he acts without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason and may be engaged in extortion and the interference with interstate commerce.
Courts have repeatedly ruled that judges have no immunity for their criminal acts. Since both treason and the interference with interstate commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.
Courts sometimes hold laws to a higher standard than a “rational basis.” Under decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court, which are authoritative as to the federal guarantees and serve as guides for the Illinois guarantees, at least two kinds of laws are held to a much high- er standard: those that (1) interfere with a “fundamental right” such as freedom of expression, voting, decisions about reproduction, or interstate travel, or (2) discriminate on the basis of a “suspect classification” such as race, ancestry, or (under the 1970 Illinois Constitution) sex.17 Both federal and Illinois decisions require such laws to have a “compelling govern- mental purpose” to be upheld.
The antonym to Sovereign is Subservience, the people in the court or on the street are NOT subservient to a service agent of a corporation currently operated by domestic enemies of I Man/We The People. You took an Oath that you have failed to honor. You are a disgrace to the Robe you pretend to serve the people in. I Do NOT Consent to ANY “services” of THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT. If the State or Federal Court Fails to address CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, CASE 21-2728 IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT, then this 10th circuit Court has NO STANDING, Jurisdiction or Authority.
Writ of Error
Paul Wilkerson
Aug 24
Comment
Share
IN THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT FOR ILLINOIS
Paul Richard Wilkerson (pro-se)
Sovereign Man, Plaintiff
V CASE# 21- 02728
WHO - et-al
Defendants
WRIT OF ERROR
I, Paul R. Wilkerson, am a sovereign man. I am before this Court by “Special Appearance”, without waiving any rights, remedies, or defenses, protected by the Illinois or UNITED STATES Constitutions and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. I refute any ORDER under this court and REFUSE TO CONSENT TO THE JUDGEMENT IN THE ABOVE CASE #. 42 USC SEC 659 (i)(4). I object to being referred to as a “straw man” ie PAUL RICHARD WILKERSON. I AM A LIVING BEING, A MAN, OF FLESH AND BLOOD. I am in the state of MAN. I am NOT an Entity such as a corporation, Trust or Person. PAUL RICHARD WILKERSON is NOT my name. My name is Paul Richard Wilkerson spelled with upper- AND lower-case symbols used in the English language. When this Plaintiff and this Court spelled (FRAUD ON THE COURT) in all capital letters they attempted to change my status from a living Man to a Dead Entity 28 USC SEC 3002 (10) “Person” includes a natural person (including an individual Indian), a corporation, a partnership, an unincorporated association, a trust, an estate or any other public or private entity, including a State or local government or an Indian tribe. See ATTACHED Duplicate, STANDARD CIRTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH DATED AUG. 29, 1973 (filed 06/09/1965). Also see STATE OF WYOMING, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH, STATE FILE #149-1965-002555 DATED Aug. 4-2021. That is a TRESPASS!
With origins buried deep in the annals of procedural history, there is a common law writ known as the
writ of error.
The purpose of this writ is not to authorize a court to review its opinion, but only to vacate some adjudication made, and should the error alleged be in the judgment itself, then remedial action must be sought through appeal or writ of error.
The writ of error coram nobis is strictly a common law writ and does not issue out of a court of chancery but circumstances amounting to extrinsic fraud, where the court assumed non-existent facts ( big PHARMA helps people, untested nano technology medical devices are vaccines, History is irrelevant, CRISPER technology is healthy, People Serve the Government, LAW does NOT apply to BAR members, "people are too small minded to run their own affairs", EUA is Legal, Alternative medicine is illegal, Freedom is only for the rich, vaccines are safe, PCR testing works, DEAD BODIES do Not smell, Fauchi has never lied, the FDA, CIA, DARPA, NSA, IRS, HHS, DNC, FBI, WHO, CNN, FOX, CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, BBC,CCP ect. don't LIE...., masks don't restrict oxygen to dangerous levels in seconds, the Constitution does not apply, insider trading is Lawful, Oath of office is just a suggestion, 5G is safe, open boarders are legal, child trafficking, rape, organ harvesting, and murder are fine, crimes against humanity is legal if you are rich, money is free, Billions of people want to die or be slaves for the good of the "community", they wouldn't dare force POISION on a Judge) absence of which entirely defeats jurisdiction, void the decisions of the court.
For argument against the writ being barred by laches, note, 59 YALE L.J. 792, N. 28 (1949).
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
But this case is very different. United States is not trying to fire anyone.
Instead, the company is trying to murder its employees obtain the COVID-19 vaccine, notwithstanding any objections they might have.
Forcing individuals to choose between their faith and their livelihood imposes an obvious and substantial burden on religion, and life.
Make no mistake: Vaccine mandates like the one United States is attempting to impose here present a crisis of conscience for many people of faith. It forces them to choose between the two most profound obligations they will ever assume—holding true to their religious commitments, life, and feeding and housing their children.
Please tell me that this is not true!!
Even God can't save America now!
God can always save America, but whether it’s His will to is what we don’t know. Keep praying!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MIUyR55rrOv4/
Oh no!
I guess courts wont block tyranny