Skip to 14:30 minutes in to this video by Dr John Campbell, but the 18 minute whole video is absorbing. Matt's messages - YouTubePeter’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
I feel something is off about at least some of those messages. Seems like it's feeding us bait. Just doesn't ring true to me that Hancock would have written that about the chips. Rang an alarm with me immediately - seems planted / deliberate. The feel I get from it all is that it's supposed to make us vote Labour or demand Boris back.
One of the crucial questions is, who licensed (EAU) the 'C-19 vaccines'?
To a FOI, MHRA answered the licensing minister.
From the 'leaked WattsApps it appears it was not M. Hancock!
Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt proved that in the USG, its licensing was done via Dod and in EU via Ursula von Leyen; both cases circumcised the health regulators FDA, EMA and MHRA.
Another crucial questions are, what did Hancock mean with chips, and is this possible in the 'vaccine'?
Multiple advanced microscopic examinations have shown that Graphen-oxide together with metallic nanoparticles show self-ensembling activities; Could that be chips?
Need to get a few things straight. 'Chips' as used in people or animals are small, but not that small. About the size of a grain of rice. There is no way such a 'chip' could be inserted with a conventional needle. None. And they would be useless any how. And they can do nothing without external power to read a static value.
Additionally about 10 doses are drawn into needles from each vial. There is no way you could somehow manage to get 1 'chip' drawn up with each needle in use.
There some smaller experimental chips played with by DARPA, but they were one-offs (absurdly expensive) that again did not do anything great (crude temperature measurement etc) and still were far to big for a needle and couldn't be used in a multiple dose vial. They also had no power supply, to activate them a special ultrasound device had to be applied to the patient's skin and the resulting primitive data could be read.
The stories 'radio signals (or even nuttier 'mind control') are pure BS.
Dr Meryl Nass has a post on this subject. She highlights this conversation was well before the independent scientists had vials to examine who found hardly any mRNA in them but found lots of metals and graphine too. Sasha Latypova and her associates in pharma manufacturing all say it's an impossibility to produce large scale batches of consistent quality due to the very fragile nature of mRNA. Swishing around in large vats would cause it to break up. She also mentioned steps on thawing and diluting, which say something on lines of 'do not shake, invert vial 10 times, slowly.' She also discussed the astronomical cost of previous mRNA gene therapy treatments, for cancer as an example, nearly $1m, and wonders how they got costs down to the levels they are for the covid jabs. I'm no expert but recall Chris Whitty saying 80% of people would get mild or no symptoms, remainder will feel ill, some take to bed a few days, some go to hospital but will get better. Only a few will need ICU and a tiny few will die. It was only after Boris's stint in hospital that the message changed. Was he really ill or was it a stunt thought up by the nudge team "to scare the pants off us?" I'm more convinced that they are experimenting with all kinds of technology as the independent analysts found none to contain identical substances.
Quite honestly at this stage nothing is beyond the realms of possibility. Very interesting that this was one of the many points that Dr. John decided to highlight. Has he joined the ranks of the conspiracy theorists?
The hubris of these parasites. Unbelievable.
The ability to smell and root out the sources of the mental virus, the big lie and part lie is still a huge factor in keeping sane. And un-confused.
I feel something is off about at least some of those messages. Seems like it's feeding us bait. Just doesn't ring true to me that Hancock would have written that about the chips. Rang an alarm with me immediately - seems planted / deliberate. The feel I get from it all is that it's supposed to make us vote Labour or demand Boris back.
One of the crucial questions is, who licensed (EAU) the 'C-19 vaccines'?
To a FOI, MHRA answered the licensing minister.
From the 'leaked WattsApps it appears it was not M. Hancock!
Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt proved that in the USG, its licensing was done via Dod and in EU via Ursula von Leyen; both cases circumcised the health regulators FDA, EMA and MHRA.
Another crucial questions are, what did Hancock mean with chips, and is this possible in the 'vaccine'?
Multiple advanced microscopic examinations have shown that Graphen-oxide together with metallic nanoparticles show self-ensembling activities; Could that be chips?
Dr. Campbell a giant among men. Best ever at avoiding the utube censor bs.
Need to get a few things straight. 'Chips' as used in people or animals are small, but not that small. About the size of a grain of rice. There is no way such a 'chip' could be inserted with a conventional needle. None. And they would be useless any how. And they can do nothing without external power to read a static value.
Additionally about 10 doses are drawn into needles from each vial. There is no way you could somehow manage to get 1 'chip' drawn up with each needle in use.
There some smaller experimental chips played with by DARPA, but they were one-offs (absurdly expensive) that again did not do anything great (crude temperature measurement etc) and still were far to big for a needle and couldn't be used in a multiple dose vial. They also had no power supply, to activate them a special ultrasound device had to be applied to the patient's skin and the resulting primitive data could be read.
The stories 'radio signals (or even nuttier 'mind control') are pure BS.
Dr Meryl Nass has a post on this subject. She highlights this conversation was well before the independent scientists had vials to examine who found hardly any mRNA in them but found lots of metals and graphine too. Sasha Latypova and her associates in pharma manufacturing all say it's an impossibility to produce large scale batches of consistent quality due to the very fragile nature of mRNA. Swishing around in large vats would cause it to break up. She also mentioned steps on thawing and diluting, which say something on lines of 'do not shake, invert vial 10 times, slowly.' She also discussed the astronomical cost of previous mRNA gene therapy treatments, for cancer as an example, nearly $1m, and wonders how they got costs down to the levels they are for the covid jabs. I'm no expert but recall Chris Whitty saying 80% of people would get mild or no symptoms, remainder will feel ill, some take to bed a few days, some go to hospital but will get better. Only a few will need ICU and a tiny few will die. It was only after Boris's stint in hospital that the message changed. Was he really ill or was it a stunt thought up by the nudge team "to scare the pants off us?" I'm more convinced that they are experimenting with all kinds of technology as the independent analysts found none to contain identical substances.
Quite honestly at this stage nothing is beyond the realms of possibility. Very interesting that this was one of the many points that Dr. John decided to highlight. Has he joined the ranks of the conspiracy theorists?