Dr John Campbell learns that the doses he received were not the same as the doses in the clinical trials – in other words, he studied the clinical trail results - he thought "informed consent" - NOPE
From this 48 minute video:
Vaccine manufacture full interview - YouTube
A full explanation of Process 1 doses – used in clinical trials – to the reduced quality in Process 2 doses – the concoction actually injected in people worldwide.
Regulators knew the far lower integrity – down to 50% - of the doses actually administered (Process 2) compared to the 70-80% integrity of the clinical trial doses manufactured using Process 1. The regulators asked for a comparison and remedial action. Pfizer ignored the regulators and instead,, said in September 2022 that billions of doses had been administered safely so there was no point.
We know that at least 17 million people died, with Pfizer injections responsible for at least a third of that number AND that one in five people suffered some kind of adverse event, injuries that only worsen with more doses and more time.
Fun, or not so fun, fact that illustrated the point. The incidence of menstrual issues in the clinical trial was 0.7% - actual adverse events in the doses injected - …drum roll.. 15%
Here are Dr Campbell’s cliff notes. To say he is angry would be an understatement. He now knows he has been conned into taking dangerous EXPERIIMENTAL injections that should never have been approved by regulators.
Dr Campbell’s notes begin:
“Two different manufacturing processes.
Pfizer covid vaccines for the clinical trials were mostly produced using manufacturing ‘process 1’ whereas the vaccines used for population vaccination were produced using a different ‘process 2’.
Interview with Josh Guetzkow PhD
Here is the BMJ link: https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o...
Josh's handle on X.com is @joshg99 and here is a link to a thread I did on P1 vs. P2: https://x.com/joshg99/status/16584211...
(Ed: There were >44,000 people in the trial, but only ~250 of them were given doses made with a new manufacturing method ('process 2') that was used to make enough doses to sell around the world.)
Here is a link to my blog:
Here are links to my posts on the Pfizer clinical trial
https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o...
https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.105...
https://twitter.com/joshg99/status/16...
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/...
End of Dr Campbell’s notes.
I don’t think he is too happy about his previous posts about the clinical trials!
I would point out that although both Josh and John seem to think the Phase 3 clinical trials show that the mRNA injections were safe, I think they need to look at these results and either discredit them or take them into account when commenting on the Process 1 doses used in the Phase 3 Pfizer Clinical trials.
The COVID-19 Inoculations - More Harm Than Good FINAL Video & Print (canadiancovidcarealliance.org)
Page 11 has this:
The injections are far worse than the disease – and 20 died in the BNT162b2 injected group compared to 14 in the placebo (page 12).
Onwards!
Please buy a subscription or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 coffee a week!
Even though the trial produce MUCH evidence they are required to coverup, (it was already VERY toxic) they always "change the recipe" to make it even MORE toxic for the general public.
This whole "informed consent" has no enforcement mechanism or legal REMEDY in America, or anywhere else. It's just an idea, lip service, a "right" with ZERO remedy with which to enforce it.
According the U.S. Supreme Court, extermination of the American people is a "constitutionally authorized activity" of the federal government. They can't see ANYTHING in the Constitution that prohibits this action on the part of the federal government.
I'd sooner trust Sponge Bob Square Pants to "interpret" the Constitution for us. But this is NOT a result of SCOTUS not understanding the Constitution. It's a matter of SCOTUS being fully onboard with the extermination of the American people, and ALL of them being more than happy to abuse their seats in order to lend an air of "legitimacy" and "authority" to the process of EXTERMINATING the American people.
They ALL know perfectly well what they're doing. This is NOT a matter of the "evidence" not being more than sufficient. At this point in time, SCOTUS has no more legitimacy than when they ruled that the Constitution didn't prohibit slavery, thus kicking off the civil war.
Makes you wonder what they used as the “actual” placebos.