Dr Willie Soon of CERES debunks the “global warming” assumptions of the UN IPCC - They turn everything into a cartoon … all of it is not even close to the truth, it’s a joke”
Hot on the heels of evidence that the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change extrapolates straight lines to depict climate cycles and uses “dry air” instead of “wet air” in clouds etc in its climate models, we have this, from here:
“One of the claims the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) makes in their August 2021 report is that “urbanisation bias” is very small, less than 10%. Dr. Willie Soon says this is nonsense. It’s at least 40% and it’s easy to prove.”
The UN IPCC mixes hot (5 degrees centigrade higher) city data with colder rural and sea level data. It is called the Urban Heat Island effect.
As a reminder, here is a link to the correct use of extrapolations of climate cycles over the long term (centuries), rather than linear interpolation of short term (a few decades) trends used by the UN IPCC.
And how the draconian attempts to shut down farms to reduce methane emissions along with attempts to reduce CO2 emissions are based on the earth’s atmosphere being made up of “dry air”, rather than the actual dominant presence of CLOUDS of wet air.
The Expose-news.com article makes it strike three and should cause all government policies globally to immediately abandon their debunked “green” polices enshrined in laughably arbitrary dated “treaties” and agreements such as 2030 and 2050.
All plans like forcing cows to eat seaweed or wear face and butt nappies are simply ridiculous with no basis in any properly conducted science. Same goes for “15 minute cities” and “zero carbon” airports.
Don’t forget this declaration from actual scientists, rather than the “11, 000 scientists agree” made up of dermatologists etc who have zero climate and atmospheric science qualifications.
Global Warming Petition Project – 31,500 American scientists including 9,000 PhD’s.
Here is a link to Dr Soon’s 22 minute presentation and another to a slide deck debunking temperature changes predicted by UN IPCC models.
Dr. Willie Soon investigates the causes of global warming - YouTubeDr. Willie Soon's February 2023 presentation at ICCC15, Florida (USA) (ceres-science.com)
Dr. Willie Soon's February 2023 presentation at ICCC15, Florida (USA) (ceres-science.com)
Plus a one hour 19 minute video that does a deep dive on the (enforced) abbreviated versions above
Willie Soon: Global warming: Mostly human-caused or natural? | Tom Nelson Podcast #79 - YouTube
Please watch the video’s – they are enlightening and reveal the complete waste of money our politicians are engaging in GLOBALLY, because they have swallowed UN IPCC propaganda hook, line and sinker.
Faux science used by the UN IPCC has a completely different purpose than “climate change”.
Here’s the dumbfounding biases (beyond “confounding”!) from the slide deck that highlights the baises in UN IPCC data:
And here is a slide showing that the urban heat island is at least 40% not the 10% claimed in the UN IPCC models - 38 minute mark in the longer video link.
These step and trend biases are all present in the fundamentally flawed UN IPCC models.
To repeat, the fundamental flaw is the use of temperature readings from cities, rather than rural temperatures that are multiple times the size of city space. Rural temperature changes are consistent with much lower temperature changes over oceans and other evidence in tree ring data and glacial length records.
“One of the claims the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) makes in their August 2021 report is that “urbanisation bias” is very small, less than 10%. Dr. Willie Soon says this is nonsense. It’s at least 40% and it’s easy to prove.”
Onwards!
Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan
The IPCC UNEP 'climatism' Trojan horse looks as obvious and decrepit as the corporate globalist Watermelons who continue to peddle it, and the gullible pecksniffians who love it.
It was as obviously dead wrong in the 1970s (imminent ice age) as it was in the 1990s, and again in 1999 when 'they' seamlessly segued from falsified "global warming" to unfalsifiable "climate change™." (a 30 yr period, for those unaware of the definition).
From the Mannian fraud of the absurd Hockey Schtick to the abolition of the Medieval and Roman warm periods, to the loss of historical data and the ridiculous stream of pre-1950 adjust down, post 1950 adjust up of 𝛿T, to the sackings and biased publications, this is a scam on steroids that forms the 101 curriculum of presstitutes and journavists.
It's wearing thin, threadbare in fact. Many now appear to see (and experience) that destitution, de-industrialisation, de-population, disease and despair are not viable characteristics for a future replete with prosperity, freedom and happiness.
Hi Peter,
Dr Willie Soon is a good friend and one of the smartest men on the planet - others are Dr Will Happer of Princeton and Dr Richard Lindzen of MIT. All of these eminent scholars are in agreement - there is no CO2-driven real climate crisis!
Told you so 20 years ago.
We published the important conclusions to the Climate (CAGW) debate in 2002 and nothing has changed:
The alleged Climate Crisis is a fifty-year-old scam, and “green energy” is not green and does not produce much useful energy.
The Climate scammers have wasted trillions of dollars and millions of lives on fraud.
FOR THE RECORD, WE PUBLISHED IN 2002:
1. “Climate science does not support the theory of catastrophic human-made global warming – the alleged warming crisis does not exist.”
2. “The ultimate agenda of pro-Kyoto advocates is to eliminate fossil fuels, but this would result in a catastrophic shortfall in global energy supply – the wasteful, inefficient energy solutions proposed by Kyoto advocates simply cannot replace fossil fuels.”
– by Sallie Baliunas (Astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian), Tim Patterson (Paleoclimatologist, Carleton U), Allan MacRae (Professional Engineer, retired (Queen’s U, U of Alberta)
I PUBLISHED ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2002 in the Calgary Herald:
3. “If [as we believe] solar activity is the main driver of surface temperature rather than CO2, we should begin the next cooling period by 2020 to 2030.”
I UPDATED MY GLOBAL COOLING PREDICTION IN 2013:
3a. “I suggest global cooling starts by 2020 or sooner. Bundle up.”
[Some say global cooling started in Feb2016, the El Nino peak, but I prefer Feb2020.]
And my explicit warning in 2013, correct to the year:
AN OPEN LETTER TO BARONESS VERMA
British Undersecretary for Energy and Climate Change, 31Oct2013
By Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc.(Eng.), M.Eng.
[excerpt]
"So here is my real concern:
IF the Sun does indeed drive temperature, as I suspect, Baroness Verma, then you and your colleagues on both sides of the House may have brewed the perfect storm.
You are claiming that global cooling will NOT happen, AND you have crippled your energy systems with excessive reliance on ineffective grid-connected “green energy” schemes.
I suggest that global cooling probably WILL happen within the next decade or sooner, and Britain will get colder.
I also suggest that the IPCC and the Met Office have NO track record of successful prediction (or “projection”) of global temperature and thus have no scientific credibility.
I suggest that Winter deaths will increase in the UK as cooling progresses.
I suggest that Excess Winter Mortality, the British rate of which is about double the rate in the Scandinavian countries, should provide an estimate of this unfolding tragedy."
See CorrectPredictions.ca and my papers listed therein for proof and links.
Allan MacRae, B.A.Sc., M.Eng., Calgary
https://energy-experts-international.com/