Hi Peter. Just subscribed for 7 day trial. You're worth your weight in gold. I was wondering if you've seen this recent video by Stefano Scoglio (italian with eng subtitles):
https://rumble.com/v1wy6e8-november-24-2022.html (rumble) I'm not sure what you you think about existence or not of pathogenic viruses but I am increasingly open to the idea. In the video, Scoglio does not get into nitty gritty of all that, just concentrates on sars2. I need to listen to it a second time because it's dense with info. May take notes and share.
Watched all but the last 7 minutes of the 39 minutes.
Wouldn't it be great to see a discussion between him and say, Drbeen and Peter McCullough? The piece he did on using humanized mice to develop a super virus is interesting. I shuddered to think of the equivalent of a bottle of shampoo being injected directly into my lungs.
I have seen "photographs" of the spike protein and pictures of its action on cell walls and organs. I have heard that no SARS-COV2 virus has been isolated - the points about ACE2 receptors and the spike not being able to penetrate cell walls is in opposition to "mainstream" thought.
Anyway, thanks again. You might be able to draw a few parallels with what Scoglio maintains. A little long and a little dated now, but the piece about how they calibrated the RT-PCR test with a "virus" is the parallel that is interesting. That is at the ten minute mark with Dr Kaufman. The proof of the virus was the substances and testing conditions - not the virus (someone proved a positive reading without any virus present)
Yes, Scoglio's take on ACE2 receptors doesn't fit ms narrative. As for photos of spike, acc. to Scoglio, what we're seeing is simply damage done to cells/organs assumed to be caused by it and no spike protein has actually been found/isolated in bodies of vaxxed, dead or alive. Not sure about Drbeen (stopped listening to him some time ago, not sure why) but certainly a discussion with s.o. like Dr McCullough would be great. Dr McC seems open-minded. His position has evolved over time, from being OK for c19vax for elderly to not OK for anyone, then saying flu shot he used to take every year was waste of time. I think he'll end up as anti-vaxxer which is just a step away from joining no virus people. Mike Yeadon's already there but not saying it outright yet. Re Dr Kaufman, I'm huge fan & think I've seen just about all of his videos, but I'll watch that one again. btw Kaufman (& Tom Cowan) did an interview with Scoglio not that long ago. Ttytt, my favourite no virus guy = Dr Mark Bailey, author of Farewell to Virology and unbeatable as debater. Are you in a position to organize debates?
I am not in any authoritative or credible position - but thanks for the question! You know how I think via this (3 month old) SubStack, but the constellation of heroes fighting this global civil war, probably do not even know I exist! It seems to me that Del Bigtree or Steve Kirsch are best placed to do this, or Senator Johnson, though Scoglio. Yeadon, CHD or WCH must know/be capable of convening such a debate.
I came across you via vid from Canadian/British Dr Roger Hodkinson who cited one of yr substack articles https://www.bitchute.com/video/ELBYFd6OnnRE/ which is short extract from a longer interview with Canadian journalist/(aspiring) politician called Laura Lyn so you may be more widely read than you think. Steve I'm afraid is a firm believer both in existence of The Virus/viruses in general so no way ever the twain shall meet! He claims to have tried to organize a debate with no virus group and he's done several articles mocking them, copped a lot of flak and lost many subscribers I think. I stayed on because he's doing good work in other areas. Also subscriber to Del Bigtree. He interviewed Dr Kaufman once, maybe a year ago, but he's not ready to embrace the issue ... yet. Tim Truth (another Canadian) organized a debate between Dr Mark Bailey & Dr Kevin McCairn - must be good 6 months ago. Worth watching. McCairn made absolute fool of h.s. Like famous Micovits vs. Dr Kaufman debate a long time ago.
PS - Just checked out yr substack profile & see you're a retiree & anti-AGW person. Same here. I started out listening to the usual pro/anti people. Learnt a lot but found it all got too political and moved on. I now keep informed on CC via Clive Best's blog https://clivebest.com/blog/?page_id=2 I wouldn't say he's "climate denier" but he's certainly not an alarmist. Very much into the data, like you, not political, and discussions on his site are always informative & polite. He's also a retiree & devotes h.s. to work on cc. Btw, you can delete this comment if you like as I'm just chatting and it has nothing to do with your article. Just letting you know if you want to take a break from covid stuff.
Lp The pp
Hi Peter. Just subscribed for 7 day trial. You're worth your weight in gold. I was wondering if you've seen this recent video by Stefano Scoglio (italian with eng subtitles):
https://rumble.com/v1wy6e8-november-24-2022.html (rumble) I'm not sure what you you think about existence or not of pathogenic viruses but I am increasingly open to the idea. In the video, Scoglio does not get into nitty gritty of all that, just concentrates on sars2. I need to listen to it a second time because it's dense with info. May take notes and share.
Many thanks!
Watched all but the last 7 minutes of the 39 minutes.
Wouldn't it be great to see a discussion between him and say, Drbeen and Peter McCullough? The piece he did on using humanized mice to develop a super virus is interesting. I shuddered to think of the equivalent of a bottle of shampoo being injected directly into my lungs.
I have seen "photographs" of the spike protein and pictures of its action on cell walls and organs. I have heard that no SARS-COV2 virus has been isolated - the points about ACE2 receptors and the spike not being able to penetrate cell walls is in opposition to "mainstream" thought.
Anyway, thanks again. You might be able to draw a few parallels with what Scoglio maintains. A little long and a little dated now, but the piece about how they calibrated the RT-PCR test with a "virus" is the parallel that is interesting. That is at the ten minute mark with Dr Kaufman. The proof of the virus was the substances and testing conditions - not the virus (someone proved a positive reading without any virus present)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/c8HpB0rQKHaX/
Yes, Scoglio's take on ACE2 receptors doesn't fit ms narrative. As for photos of spike, acc. to Scoglio, what we're seeing is simply damage done to cells/organs assumed to be caused by it and no spike protein has actually been found/isolated in bodies of vaxxed, dead or alive. Not sure about Drbeen (stopped listening to him some time ago, not sure why) but certainly a discussion with s.o. like Dr McCullough would be great. Dr McC seems open-minded. His position has evolved over time, from being OK for c19vax for elderly to not OK for anyone, then saying flu shot he used to take every year was waste of time. I think he'll end up as anti-vaxxer which is just a step away from joining no virus people. Mike Yeadon's already there but not saying it outright yet. Re Dr Kaufman, I'm huge fan & think I've seen just about all of his videos, but I'll watch that one again. btw Kaufman (& Tom Cowan) did an interview with Scoglio not that long ago. Ttytt, my favourite no virus guy = Dr Mark Bailey, author of Farewell to Virology and unbeatable as debater. Are you in a position to organize debates?
I am not in any authoritative or credible position - but thanks for the question! You know how I think via this (3 month old) SubStack, but the constellation of heroes fighting this global civil war, probably do not even know I exist! It seems to me that Del Bigtree or Steve Kirsch are best placed to do this, or Senator Johnson, though Scoglio. Yeadon, CHD or WCH must know/be capable of convening such a debate.
I came across you via vid from Canadian/British Dr Roger Hodkinson who cited one of yr substack articles https://www.bitchute.com/video/ELBYFd6OnnRE/ which is short extract from a longer interview with Canadian journalist/(aspiring) politician called Laura Lyn so you may be more widely read than you think. Steve I'm afraid is a firm believer both in existence of The Virus/viruses in general so no way ever the twain shall meet! He claims to have tried to organize a debate with no virus group and he's done several articles mocking them, copped a lot of flak and lost many subscribers I think. I stayed on because he's doing good work in other areas. Also subscriber to Del Bigtree. He interviewed Dr Kaufman once, maybe a year ago, but he's not ready to embrace the issue ... yet. Tim Truth (another Canadian) organized a debate between Dr Mark Bailey & Dr Kevin McCairn - must be good 6 months ago. Worth watching. McCairn made absolute fool of h.s. Like famous Micovits vs. Dr Kaufman debate a long time ago.
PS - Just checked out yr substack profile & see you're a retiree & anti-AGW person. Same here. I started out listening to the usual pro/anti people. Learnt a lot but found it all got too political and moved on. I now keep informed on CC via Clive Best's blog https://clivebest.com/blog/?page_id=2 I wouldn't say he's "climate denier" but he's certainly not an alarmist. Very much into the data, like you, not political, and discussions on his site are always informative & polite. He's also a retiree & devotes h.s. to work on cc. Btw, you can delete this comment if you like as I'm just chatting and it has nothing to do with your article. Just letting you know if you want to take a break from covid stuff.
No worries - as far as I know, there are no quota/content police here!
My two "go to" pieces on climate rremain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8455KEDitpU&t=6s
and
https://climatechangedispatch.com/the-people-promising-us-net-zero-are-clueless-about-energy-storage/
there are many more, including this one! haha
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/07/propagation-of-error-and-the-reliability-of-global-air-temperature-projections-mark-ii/