18 Comments

Now this portal by EMA says that there's only 1,266,039 reports for Pfizer (TOZINAMERAN): https://dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll?PortalPages&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FPHV%20DAP%2F_portal%2FDAP&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22Line%20Listing%20Objects%22.%22Substance%20High%20Level%20Code%22&P3=1+42325700.

For other manufacturers the number of reports is also about 40-50% of the number in your table.

Am I missing some reports, or has the data been scrubbed like how various fields were removed from the EudraVigilance reports at VAERS?

Expand full comment
author

Interesting. My data was sourcd from the Vaccine Impact website - here is a later page - https://vaccineimpact.com/2023/50663-dead-and-5315063-injured-following-covid-19-vaccines-in-european-database-of-adverse-reactions/

Vaccine Impact in turn used an individual to extract the data from the EUDRA system.

Maybe the data has been "scrubbed" by transferring duplicates to VARRS?

In short, I don't know!

In any event, the under-reporting factor to EUDRA is likely higher than the 40 estimated for VAERS. Maybe as high as 70 - according to one subscriber called "momo"

Expand full comment

I should've read the article by Vaccine Impact more carefully. It says that Pfizer had 1,162,744 adverse event reports which included a total of 2,667,243 symptoms. So if for example there were 3 different symptoms listed in an adverse event report, I think it was counted 3 times and not just once.

The average number of symptoms per report was about 2.4, so it explains why your numbers were more than twice as high as the number of reports I got from EMA's portal.

Expand full comment
Mar 5Liked by Peter Halligan

Pfizer Inc ALC-0315, Moderna Inc SM-102 ,AZ contains an adjuvant of polysolvate 80. Vaccine ingredients must be transparently disclosed to determine the cause of sudden death.

Expand full comment
author

Yep. I'm wondering whether the ingredients cause fibrin clots which. in turn cause most of the adverse events.from injections.

A msaller propensity in the infection may cause long cvid as well?

Expand full comment
Mar 5Liked by Peter Halligan

The special processing technology of adjuvants in vaccines is continuously advancing, and with PLGA encapsulation technology, the release rate of antigens and toxins can be controlled within the capsule. The degradation and biodegradation rates of PLGA vary depending on the specified molecular weight, composition, and encapsulation conditions. Generally, PLGA with lower molecular weight degrades and biodegrades more quickly.

Antigens encapsulated in PLGA capsules can typically be released for a few weeks to several months. For example, PLGA with lower molecular weight (10,000-20,000) can provide drug release for a few weeks to a few months, while PLGA with higher molecular weight (50,000-100,000) can sustain release for several months to a few years.

The release rate of the drug can also vary depending on the ratio of lactic acid to glycolic acid in PLGA. Generally, PLGA with a higher glycolic acid ratio degrades faster and leads to faster drug release.

By controlling the molecular weight and composition of PLGA, it may be possible to design capsules that do not cause inflammation in the body and avoid long-lasting COVID symptoms. I believe that having a weakened immune system due to immune suppression can result in extended cold symptoms.

Expand full comment
author

A better and safer delivery mechanism?

Forgive me for not having your level of expertise, I don't know how PLGA can maintain stability of mRNA o delivery of the "pay load" or whether pseudo-uridine woks well with it or whether natural uridine can worl (I vonfess to not knowing what uridine - pseudo or otherwise) even does!.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31663483/

Expand full comment
Mar 7Liked by Peter Halligan

PLGA-based nanoparticles can encapsulate and protect mRNA, maintaining stability while being capable of transporting it to target tissues or cells. The mRNA acts as a drug within the nanoparticle and is released at the appropriate time to reach the given cells and deliver genes.

Furthermore, the surface of the nanoparticle can be coated with specific ligands or antibodies to allow selective binding to specific cells. This enables mRNA vaccines to be effectively delivered to specific cells for targeted therapy.

Packaging mRNA vaccines in nanoparticle form involves trade secrets such as release kinetics, rate, external control, and gene delivery to specific cells. We should always question and inquire about the potential adverse effects and risks associated with these technologies.

Expand full comment
author

Posted with a h/t to "Bound" - = 결박한?

Expand full comment
Nov 30, 2022Liked by Peter Halligan

"mix & match"!!

Clearly a strategy to obfuscate the adverse effects.....

Which "jab" when, time between "jabs" .... day of the week... ??

Expand full comment

Knee deep in dead bodies one of the leading UK "expert" RsClowns insisted.

Maybe he was just actually ahead of the curve.

Current world deaths from the jabs wouldn't be a pretty sight if they were all stacked up.

Expand full comment

I've been warning people for some time now that the adenoviral vector vaccines are even more dangerous than the LNP mRNA products - and that's really saying something! This may be due to the adenovirus itself. which was known to cause thrombosis and thrombocytopenia years ago, but was nevertheless used in a highly experimental vaccine rolled out to many millions of unsuspecting human guinea pigs. The developers of these products and the governments who pushed them should be in court - instead the British establishment rewarded the people involved in the development of the Astra Zeneca product with Dame and Knighthoods!

https://climatecontrarian.wordpress.com/2021/05/28/revealed-why-the-oxford-astrazeneca-jab-is-even-more-dangerous-than-the-mrna-vaccines/

Expand full comment

Here is some GREAT news everyone!!! Western University Drops ALL Vaccine Mandates

And Twitter drops Covid Misinformation Policy

Remember the scandal with Western University in Ontario, Canada, that was requiring boosters from its students?

That’s the college that required bivalent boosters for fall classes.

"What made them change their minds?

I am sure it is you, the protesters, the public, substack authors, etc.

The experts are possibly starting to worry that their role in the “pandemic” will soon be subject to pointed questions from the disappointed public worried about health and fertility.

Personally, I will do my best to continue exposing Covid criminals so that they are not let off the hook and their crimes are not forgotten.

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/western-university-drops-all-vaccine?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=441185&post_id=87658338&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment

Maybe different URF's for the different vaxxes?

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022·edited Nov 29, 2022Liked by Peter Halligan

Yeah I don't trust this data. The viral vector vaccines clearly have sharper SHORT-TERM gender-biased risks; but their long term risks (unscientifically going from my personal anecdotal experiences & evidence) seem far less correlated with increases in long-term illnesses - particularly cardiac diseases and cancers. Those seem more mRNA "vaccine" correlated IMO.

Expand full comment

I agree with your comment. Wondering if you still agree? It seems the pseudouridine in the mRNA jab causes the spike protein to keep proliferating long after injection. If you live through the first month after viral vector jab, seems like things stablize.

Expand full comment
author

the truth is out there - the crimes are evident

Expand full comment