Excellent comment on the fraud in the VAERS system – as per CDC/FDA/WHO instructions – Catch 22 in reporting that might mean that the under reporting factor was and is much higher
Fellow SubStacker Joy Lucette Garner posted a comment in reply to this post yesterday:
The logic is compelling, here it is, in full:
Joy Lucette Garner Writes Joy’s Newsletter 12 hrs ago·
There is no way to estimate how high the under-reporting became under the CDC's "covid emergency" directive that hospitals must fraudulently classify recently-vaccinated people (who show up dying or dead) as "unvaccinated."
I mean, how exactly does ANYTHING get reported as a "vaccine injury" when the person is formally listed in the hospital records as "unvaccinated?" Nobody has ever explained this to me. Because the CDC's directive required this false classification ("unvaccinated") for all those who had only gotten one jab, and also those who had gotten the 2nd less than 2 weeks prior to showing up at the hospital (dying or dead) it plays out like this:
1. Almost all of the injuries and deaths occurring shortly after the 1st jab would likely never be reported to VAERS, or if reported, would be rejected by VAERS since the person is classified as "unvaccinated."
2. Almost all of the injuries and deaths occurring within 2 weeks of the 2nd jab would likely never be reported to VAERS, or if reported, would be rejected by VAERS due to the fraudulent "unvaccinated" classification.
3. Since VAERS will reject all reported deaths and injuries if the first symptoms appear more than 30 days after vaccination, we might get to that "less than 1%" reporting rate for CV-19 jabs for those who got the 2nd jab more than 2 weeks prior to onset of symptoms, but NOT for those whose symptoms began more than 2 weeks after their 2nd jab. And since the worst lots typically produced symptoms immediately, or almost immediately, after injection, the CDC knew their directive to the hospitals would effectively eliminate almost all reporting of injuries and deaths.
The CDC effectively (intentionally) eliminated potential reports on anyone who got sick (or died) after the 1st jab (alone) and ALSO those who were injured or died within 2 weeks of the 2nd jab. This left only a NARROW portion of deaths and injuries that would even be allowed into their system, to include ONLY those who got sick or died 2 weeks after their 2nd jab, but NOT those who got sick and/or died 30 days after their 2nd jab.
From what I have seen, it does look like the people who are going to get sick and/or die after these jabs, DO have symptoms (of some sort) immediately, or almost immediately after injection. But these people have already been fraudulently classified as "unvaccinated" due to the date their symptoms began.
And we're supposed to believe any of this was an "accident?" I do not believe there was even ONE hospital worker who didn't know WHY they were fraudulently classifying recently-vaccinated (and injured or dead) people as "unvaccinated." They are ALL guilty. Once you know the truth of what has happened here, you'd have to be out of your gourd to ever trust ANYONE in the medical system again.”
Onwards!
Please subscribe or donate via Ko-fi – any amount from 3 bucks upwards. Don’t worry and God Bless, if you can’t or don’t want to. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 Ko-fi donation a week!
There may well be a template out there for how the guilty parties want the reporting rate to look like. The MHRA in the UK caught themselves by announcing an expected injury report rate of 1 in 1000 doses only to receive 3-6 reports per 1000 in the first year, only to claim this was not unusual based on it being a new vaccine and a few other very dodgy caveats.
FOI's reveal more detail. They claim that reporting rates are usually high for the first year or two for a vaccine before settling down, basically saying that the level of under reporting is much lower during this time. I didn't fully research but this seems largely or even solely based on the disastrous Meningitis C vaccine administered in 2000 which saw toddlers fitting in the doctors surgery. Injury reporting rates there were around 1 per 1000 for a year or so leading to a sudden influx of Yellow Cards before settling down again. Perhaps the product was "rectified" in the end but what a convenient model for them to use. The COVID vaccine reporting rate eventually declined to about 1 and then 0.5 reports per 1000 doses. This is extremely suspicious as I demonstrated in my first post. And for old times sake here:
https://open.substack.com/pub/feldmans/p/are-the-mhra-releasing-all-of-their?r=xwknv&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Go read Zowe substack, by hospital Medical Coder! Now ex. She describes how they were given new codes to use which inflated numbers and talks about vaccine injury codes normally being set up prior to any vax launch. She says the WHO has actually set up a Cov vax injury code and gives the code. However, unlike other updates which are communicated to Coders, this one wasn't and she, because of suspicions early on and her observations ongoing, she found it hidden away. At the time of discovery, only 18 people were coded as such. Everything inversed with the coding- if you were suffering any chronic or acute respiratory problem, Covid code became primary but for vax injuries they would be coded as to what ailment, heart attack etc. without the vax injury code as well.