Fauci's (temporary) replacement spearheaded efforts to broaden the federal agency’s collaborative research with Chinese military-linked scientific institutions
Just when you thought there might be a tiny snippet of sanity, beyond genocide and human experimentation we get this:
Fauci’s Replacement Signed Deals Pushing Research Collaboration With Chinese Communist Party In Wuhan, Responsible For Secret Reversal Of Gain-of-Function Funding Ban. – Steve Bannon's War Room: Pandemic
https://warroom.org/2022/12/10/faucis-succcesor-spearheaded-collaboration-with-ccp-on-gof-research/
As they say using Cockney rhyming slang: “Would you Adam and Eve it?”
From the article:
“Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, selected to be Dr. Anthony Fauci’s temporary successor at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, spearheaded efforts to broaden the federal agency’s collaborative research with Chinese military-linked scientific institutions that funded controversial bat coronavirus research conducted by the Wuhan Institute of Virology and EcoHealth Alliance.”
And here he is:
“Auchincloss’s intimate role in fostering collaboration between China and the U.S. on scientific research, perhaps even the studies that scientists allege have led to the creation of COVID-19, also comes amidst Fauci sending him panicked emails about the potential “gain-of-function” research that occurred at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”
“During a recent deposition of Fauci, he also appeared to blame aides – likely Auchincloss – for granting exceptions to researchers conducting deadly gain-of-function research such as Ralph Baric. While discussing the research activity of Baric, who has been described by Wuhan Institute of Virology bat coronavirus researcher as a “longtime collaborator”, Fauci explicitly pointed to Auchincloss as responsible for giving Baric an exemption to the agency’s ban on the deadly form of research.”
So there you have it. No doubt Resident POXONUS got a call from Xi!
Follow the money.
WTH? They simply will NOT stop, Peter! What is the answer?