12 Comments
User's avatar
Nanc's avatar

Yes, the acknowledgment is nice, but wayyy tooo late. Anyone with half a brain cell knows you don’t take experiential vaccines under any circumstances. In fact the information is out there and has been before this gubment psyop, covid, that there is NO such thing as a safe vaccine.

And my question is exactly how do you budget for a human life? Answer, you don’t! You simply cannot put a price tag on Gods creation.

Me, I’m more of an eye for an eye kinda of gal. Keep your blood money I want you swinging from the gallows!

Expand full comment
Nanc's avatar

WOW a measly 1,500 for a permanently damaged heart the will cost millions in a life time to live with, sorry I don’t see any win here.

Expand full comment
Kitsune, Maskless Crusader.'s avatar

The acknowledgement that vax injuries are happening is the win, and it is a big win. The paltry payouts though, are an insult. They could also be an indicator that they expect more such claims and are budgeting for them.

Expand full comment
Bull Dog's avatar

I supect a kidney is only worth a couple hundred bucks then. Ugh.

Expand full comment
2FollowHim's avatar

I was appalled, horrified having read and heard some accounts.

Can I say that, generally, often, nobody cares about us? Except

as we pay taxes, buy things, work for low wages. Used. Abused.

There ARE exceptions. Let me spread some light here saying how

I made a mess of a GOVERNMENT form(a big no, no) for tax relief.

The government officials STRUGGLED to make sense of it, and

got me the benefit. So, there COULD be exceptions?!

Otherwise, knowing you're 'on your own', except for those concerned, excellent writers (like yourself and others) become

your future help and guide. We can and will help each other.

We need platforms, maybe, I don't know, people could ask

what to do? Options? Or groups they could form?

Those poor people who filed wouldn't cover their fees!!

I'd say they needed a platform to join up with others, go together.

Get a stronger lawyer.

I think US must impeach the president, and stop being intimidated that Kamala Harris will mess us(she will), but maybe not as much

as this leader?

He's using that.

Expand full comment
Peter Halligan's avatar

Thanks for this. The combined wisdom of the many far exceeds the combined dumbness of the few in government or in any arm of it - whether that is national, state, local or agencies like the UN and its "organs" of the WHO and IPCC.

Expand full comment
2FollowHim's avatar

I think, ok, just one person, but I think there MAY be a shift where some of the 'collective' begin to offer their own skills online, link up, form some 'community', say gardening, groups.

They're online, too, but also 'exchange groups'...ideas,

practical things. Again, there may be sites, but more can happen.

People with young children don't have answers; older ones know some things.

Move AWAY from these power groups, go grassroots.

Again, it's on YouTube but disconnected.

To succeed, USA will need connect points.

And for sure there is a downside to everything but

how it is now...makes people victims, powerless.

Expand full comment
Peter Halligan's avatar

The vast majority of people are interested in connecting with others as they journey through life. The ability to even say "hello, how are you" is under threat by the swamp and the deep state, who do not want even the most basic human interactions to be outside their control and diktat.

We, the people, can govern ourselves. The swamp, the WEF, the sanctimonious institutions, have forgotten that. The others govern with our tolerance and say-so and are employed to do our bidding in a way we cannot do for ourselves.

Good over evil, or else the kakistocrats and bureucrats force a world of excited misery.

Expand full comment
2FollowHim's avatar

King Charles set up what became WEF, not sure if he chose Schwabb. King Charles, for one example OWNS Canada.

I was told what he OWNS, he can SELL, eg, for benefits etc.

King Charles won't be quiet, in the background like his mother.

I just don't see a 'good future' ahead. As they say about power.

With this in mind, plus Biden, various in Canada right now, not

up on UK, EU, middle east.

He's for WEF, 'Climate change' policies, was best friends with Jimmy Saville, tells you, won't support Christian church(a first),

pro-Muslim.

Where will that lead, in your view?

Expand full comment
Peter Halligan's avatar

ALL proponents of faux climate change or WEF coordination of human development are charlatans (Charlesatans?) and snake oil salesman who have problems with their egos.

I doubt the UK monarchy can do anything significant without the agreement of Ottawa. In theory the Governor General can sack the Canadian government, as happened in Australia decades ago, but the paper tiger nature of the GG post was revealed when Trudeau enacted the measures during the trucker protest. Those egregious actions should have resulted in his sacking by the GG.

So, in short, Charles has been able to pursue his "green" hobbies - such as the "eden project"

https://www.edenproject.com/visit and other green stuff referenced here: https://royalcentral.co.uk/features/insight/5-of-prince-charles-eco-friendly-endeavors-56023/

so, he is "green" to the hilt. I don't know whether it was he or Prince Phillip who "anointed" schwab or someone else - maybe schwab on his own dr evil pathway.

one thing is for sure, they will bend with the wind, as the evidence becomes too obvious to deny, silence will ensue as will the pursuit of policies of misery.

Expand full comment
2FollowHim's avatar

I think King Charles OWNING 93%(or 97%?) of Canada would hold a lot more power than

Ottawa.

I wonder just who agreed to this 'inperpetuitus agreement with no 'end point for having

our freedom? Also, this was done I think far more with the Eastern Provinces, and

how it was ratified with the West is a mystery for sure. Who passed this?

(got paid off big time?), nobody gives that much land to England.

At this time, I don't know if the carbon from volcanoes is just the same as the

carbon from what man produces. And I'm inclined to think there can be

a problem for sure.

For example, I've always been against pollutants from vehicles for many reasons,

including health because the end products of gasoline combine too easily with

other toxins in the air, making air pollution worse.

But the BIGGEST that I see? The BIGGEST? The pollution in the oceans, the

nuclear waste, (Japan etc), the constant dumping in the oceans, (China apparently

the worst).

So, I think there is trouble, and I agree with Klaus with SOME of that.

He however does not see individuals as important or worthy of anything,

and there we part company. I'd say it was 'top down', wouldn't you?

Trudeau thinks that's the way to go, that China could fix things easily

being 'top down', with no human rights standing in the way.

Well, China seems to be suffering now, so I wonder how Trudeau justifies it all now?

Expand full comment
2FollowHim's avatar

Am I right that both these people believe there's 'climate change'?

https://youtu.be/xdoDoqWT4Cc, hope this works.

Years ago, 11+, on yahoo answers, I asked some questions on climate etc., and got really expert people on opposite sides.

I didn't know.

Now, I'm perhaps?, inclined to think there IS, it's bad, and

maybe??, just maybe the 'atmosphere', or whatever the proper term may be 'adjusting' this.

Also, I have to wonder if volcanoes spew the same thing

man makes?

I tend to think the WEF is using climate change to their own ends.

After all, you know Obama built his mansion on the beach

with a 1.5 foot(?) wall. Right ✅️. Got it.

I know that China PAINTED mountains and threw thousands of feet of chain with plastic greenery to hide the barrenness of

their forests(bad).

The Arctic is changing (bad).

I read there are openings in the ocean floor that 'breathe'.

They might be counter balancing.

Do I think cars do that, wreck the environment?

These governments have power. They shut down

a large area for 6 months, put special transit in place,

MEASURE, measure oxygen, etc. Relationship between

oxygen and carbon dioxide.

Pretty soon we all must die so we don't emit carbon dioxide,

even though we don't know what happens next to it.

I tene to not think millions, billions will die, period.

Things will happen and people will find answers.

I don't think this situation is 'too hard'. It's there, real, but they'll solve it.

That's the beauty of humans.

Expand full comment