Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DrLatusDextro's avatar

Just retiring NZ PM (and former COVID Minister) has already proclaimed the distinction between "mandate" and "compulsion."

The latter is being reserved exclusively for the WHO promoted next round that will be enacted by governments acting as "blameless" blind foot-soldiers of supra-national edict.

Actions have already been approved by the NZ Ethics Review ~ https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/the-social-licence-is-evaporating

The MSM story died a death within 24 hrs. People it seems could care less.

"The Ladder Of Coercion segues through conditioning, bribery, financial coercion, fines, societal exclusion, and culminates in the elimination of choice including the denial of access to medical treatment, to groceries and other essential activities."

"Presumably then, ‘extinction’ becomes the implied State focused probability. Inconvenient miscreants who do not comply with the collective are eventually excluded and then rendered ‘extinct’ from the collective."

Expand full comment
Wally TangoFoxtrot's avatar

Extortion is not an ‘opportunity’.

There was no free choice or association with this mandate. People were coerced into accepting its terms or face an organized enforcement of conditions that were a detriment to the contract (mandate) party.

Given that the elements of extortion, coercion, enforced punishment and now evidence that the shot was both fraudulent and toxic, how does the fraud not invalidate the civil aspect for tort pursuit and how does not the other racketeering and administration of noxious substances not qualify for criminal prosecution?

There are fundamental breakdowns here that are more than opportune for local civil and criminal action plus a racketeering and organized crime aspect that pave the way to regional and international Nuremberg Trial type prosecutions.

Where are you police and prosecutors?

Were your families not victims too?

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts