Just retiring NZ PM (and former COVID Minister) has already proclaimed the distinction between "mandate" and "compulsion."
The latter is being reserved exclusively for the WHO promoted next round that will be enacted by governments acting as "blameless" blind foot-soldiers of supra-national edict.
The MSM story died a death within 24 hrs. People it seems could care less.
"The Ladder Of Coercion segues through conditioning, bribery, financial coercion, fines, societal exclusion, and culminates in the elimination of choice including the denial of access to medical treatment, to groceries and other essential activities."
"Presumably then, ‘extinction’ becomes the implied State focused probability. Inconvenient miscreants who do not comply with the collective are eventually excluded and then rendered ‘extinct’ from the collective."
So I guess we will see the same response in all 194 countries stupid enough to have signed these so called contracts! The fact they produced various processes and products should null void anything these contracts!
Hey - it’s their story and they are sticking to it… did you think they are going to admit they have done anything wrong? Criminals are always innocent. Just ask them…
Yup... anything like this is slippery slope that leads to a bad place for these criminals.... so they will be not be going near anything like this. They are criminals... it's what criminal do.
There was no free choice or association with this mandate. People were coerced into accepting its terms or face an organized enforcement of conditions that were a detriment to the contract (mandate) party.
Given that the elements of extortion, coercion, enforced punishment and now evidence that the shot was both fraudulent and toxic, how does the fraud not invalidate the civil aspect for tort pursuit and how does not the other racketeering and administration of noxious substances not qualify for criminal prosecution?
There are fundamental breakdowns here that are more than opportune for local civil and criminal action plus a racketeering and organized crime aspect that pave the way to regional and international Nuremberg Trial type prosecutions.
They need to hang and from the highest trees!....All of them!
Just retiring NZ PM (and former COVID Minister) has already proclaimed the distinction between "mandate" and "compulsion."
The latter is being reserved exclusively for the WHO promoted next round that will be enacted by governments acting as "blameless" blind foot-soldiers of supra-national edict.
Actions have already been approved by the NZ Ethics Review ~ https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/the-social-licence-is-evaporating
The MSM story died a death within 24 hrs. People it seems could care less.
"The Ladder Of Coercion segues through conditioning, bribery, financial coercion, fines, societal exclusion, and culminates in the elimination of choice including the denial of access to medical treatment, to groceries and other essential activities."
"Presumably then, ‘extinction’ becomes the implied State focused probability. Inconvenient miscreants who do not comply with the collective are eventually excluded and then rendered ‘extinct’ from the collective."
So I guess we will see the same response in all 194 countries stupid enough to have signed these so called contracts! The fact they produced various processes and products should null void anything these contracts!
The contracts cannot be legally binding with foreknowledge of harm and death.
Hey - it’s their story and they are sticking to it… did you think they are going to admit they have done anything wrong? Criminals are always innocent. Just ask them…
The point Rennick made was that there was not even a gesture to provide an endowment for victims from the super profits made.
Yup... anything like this is slippery slope that leads to a bad place for these criminals.... so they will be not be going near anything like this. They are criminals... it's what criminal do.
Hang 'em high!!
Extortion is not an ‘opportunity’.
There was no free choice or association with this mandate. People were coerced into accepting its terms or face an organized enforcement of conditions that were a detriment to the contract (mandate) party.
Given that the elements of extortion, coercion, enforced punishment and now evidence that the shot was both fraudulent and toxic, how does the fraud not invalidate the civil aspect for tort pursuit and how does not the other racketeering and administration of noxious substances not qualify for criminal prosecution?
There are fundamental breakdowns here that are more than opportune for local civil and criminal action plus a racketeering and organized crime aspect that pave the way to regional and international Nuremberg Trial type prosecutions.
Where are you police and prosecutors?
Were your families not victims too?
😡😡😖
And all done while there was never an actual pandemic.
PsyOpdemic
Nope, we didn't mandate an injection of "vaccine" at all, it was a BIOWEAPON!
1984 was originally titled 1948 and was written in the lead up to WW2.
Most of the world was engaged in desperate thought at that time.