When I see reports like this, I usually think of the movie Forrest Gump where his mother would say 'Stupid is as stupid does.' Nearly four years on, no-one has actually proved the existence of this novel 'virus' according to many learned medics and researchers inc Dr Paul Alxander. Added to this is the fact that the pcr test is not a test, it's a process (Dr Kary Mullis). It was never designed to test for a live virus, it was a process to capture any left-over debris from previous infections. With a 94% false positive rate, there's no wonder we ended up with so many people self-isolating. The LFT test was allegedly more stable but then tested against the pcr for reliability (pffftt.....) (Prof Norman Fenton). How can anyone take them seriously, let alone an accurate way to test for a mythical disease?
For PCR testing at least, staff admit they should consider the clinical context of the patient. Then think about how easy it is for PCR's to test positive without symptoms - they are jacked up to 45 cycles of amplification and cannot tell you anything about infection.
Yet, out of 4 hospital trusts (4 multiple sites) who were in a position to answer, in only 1 case was a PCR test ever overridden with the added note that "this is very rare".
They did kind of the same in NewYork State. If you tested pos and were being quarantined, they called you back regardless because they were short staffed.
When I see reports like this, I usually think of the movie Forrest Gump where his mother would say 'Stupid is as stupid does.' Nearly four years on, no-one has actually proved the existence of this novel 'virus' according to many learned medics and researchers inc Dr Paul Alxander. Added to this is the fact that the pcr test is not a test, it's a process (Dr Kary Mullis). It was never designed to test for a live virus, it was a process to capture any left-over debris from previous infections. With a 94% false positive rate, there's no wonder we ended up with so many people self-isolating. The LFT test was allegedly more stable but then tested against the pcr for reliability (pffftt.....) (Prof Norman Fenton). How can anyone take them seriously, let alone an accurate way to test for a mythical disease?
How is it wrong?
Feel ill, stay home.
It's always been that way.
It would appear that Stephen has not understood that this is the proper way to deal with this infection.
He's too busy clutching his pearls and crying.
For PCR testing at least, staff admit they should consider the clinical context of the patient. Then think about how easy it is for PCR's to test positive without symptoms - they are jacked up to 45 cycles of amplification and cannot tell you anything about infection.
Yet, out of 4 hospital trusts (4 multiple sites) who were in a position to answer, in only 1 case was a PCR test ever overridden with the added note that "this is very rare".
They know this is all garbage
They did kind of the same in NewYork State. If you tested pos and were being quarantined, they called you back regardless because they were short staffed.