27 Comments

Eugenics is alive and well in the 21st century and they are on track to meet these dreadful targets.

Expand full comment

Oh! So now with seven and a half billion we've got to suddenly worry about a secretly planned sharp decrease in the world population even as every governmental numbskull screams 'We need more young!'.

Expand full comment

Most countries are likely stupid and uncaring about their PEOPLE and will sign on to the

WHO's binding agreement and then new Plandemics will occur and be totally controlled

Billy the goat gates and his paid for WHO EXCUTORS,!

Expand full comment

If all the eltes have there way we will be down to 1 billion time to kill off the old farts of the WEF all of them.

Expand full comment

We could not pretend we are God anymore, and just let nature take her course, as the one and only Natural God will have her do.

Expand full comment
May 8, 2023Liked by Peter Halligan

Mikhail Gorbachev:

“We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”

Jacques Cousteau UNESCO Courier 1991:

“In order to save the planet it would be necessary to kill 350,000 people per day.”

Ted Turner makes the radical statement that, “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal,”

Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood, funded by the Rockefellers) said in her proposed “The American Baby Code”, intended to become law:

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991:

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill (this is absolute proof that man made global warming is a fabrication)…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

Expand full comment
author

Ugh!!!

These comments are abhorrent.

Mankind is far from perfect, but, as with even Orwell in his novel (originally titled 1948) 1984, if you only see the dark side, that is all you will prepare for.

There is a bright side and one that will make people better off, healthier and smarter, rather than the poor sick and stupid world of excited misery these narratives spout forth.

The trick is to elect politicians who will enact policies that guard against the dark whilst moving toward the light.

Expand full comment

You're right, there is a bright side. That's the side I choose. I posted those quotes so that people can see how far back it goes and examples of the human haters own words...We are in a mass culling presently...I was born in 1960, In philly, seeing the population being decimated, up close and personal..I've lost so many friends and family, to cancer etc. I can't even count them... Everything has been consolidated over the last half century...The agenda is U.N 2030

Expand full comment

It's amazing to me with all this population reduction talk, that more people haven't caught on yet!

I mean what more do you need?

At this point, nobody should expect the government ANYWHERE to do what's best for its citizens.

It's the, "That's crazy, they're never going to do that..." crowd. Only they are doing it, and they're pretty up front about it!

Expand full comment
author

Revolutions have started for far less. Just takes one to start the dance!

Expand full comment
founding

I read somewhere that world population is much lower than we are told. Reasons cited were interest by developing countries in over-estimating their population in order to get more development assistance aid, more loans from WB/IMF, interest by population reduction advocates/CAGW alarmists to make demographics appear worse than is actually the case. I recall them citing China's impossibility of attaining current claimed population level given several decades of single-child policy. I don't know whether there's any truth in this.

Expand full comment
author

Makes sense.

Most numbers come from the UN that takes national numbers every five years and admits to a 2-3% margin for error (160 to 240 million).

https://www.scienceabc.com/eyeopeners/how-is-the-global-population-counted.html

Expand full comment
founding
May 8, 2023Liked by Peter Halligan

Thanks for the link. What I read was it was much more than 2-3% difference and nothing to do with error. I'm trying to find where I read this and will post to you if I find it.

Expand full comment
author

Good stuff!

The truth is out there!

Expand full comment
founding
May 8, 2023Liked by Peter Halligan

Can't find original article. However, a certain Remarque88 from Canada did a video about it in Oct22 on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/vrcuaN6nj8Ps/ Now this guy is a plagiarizer as he pretends to have done the calculations himself so I'm not recommending him. I also called him out on this and other stuff after which he banned me from commenting. However the original article is out there somewhere. I haven't given up finding it. That said, he does a good summary of original article.

Expand full comment
author

Interesting.

China and India each claim to have 1.4 billion people.

Maybe his numbers are right, but in China, cell phones are used as a from of ID to allow social credit score maintenance, so numbers will be available for that - maybe they are lied about, only the CCP will know.

India already has a biometric national ID system - Aadhaar.

https://www.cio.com/article/234316/a-look-at-indias-biometric-id-system-digital-apis-for-a-connected-world.html

Of course, they could also be lying about the numbers.

Transparency is, as always, the key to accuracy and progress.

Expand full comment

.

If You Hold The Skull

Of A Vaccinated Person

Up To Your Ear

You Can Hear Time Ticking Backwards.

And Reruns Of Oprah.

.

Expand full comment

And if you look through the emptiness between the ear holes, you can see The View and those women and beta males who watch that commie-mommy travesty.

Expand full comment
May 8, 2023Liked by Peter Halligan

https://www.brightu.com/

Expand full comment

It’s going to happen a lot faster than that

Expand full comment

A hell of a lot faster.

Expand full comment

.

Tech Rumor:

The New IPhone Will Require

A Three Year Pre-Paid Service Contract.

As The IPhone Itself Is Anticipated

To Last Longer

Than The Vaccinated User.

.

Expand full comment

Perhaps Mr Meadows should be the first volunteer to reduce the world's population. Oh, but no, he will volunteer everyone else but himself and his loved ones to be killed in service of the greed of the psychopathic overlords.

Expand full comment

Nice commentary. re. "My goodness, did I just commit heresy against the “cult of green”?"

Heresy is the 'in' thing these days.

The planet has greened by some 15% in the last 20 years leading to net cooling..https://twitter.com/21stCDelusions/status/1628323188751978500

MODIS Shows Earth is Greener (2019)

https://terra.nasa.gov/news/modis-shows-earth-is-greener

Greening of the Earth Mitigates Surface Warming (2020)

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/greening-of-the-earth-mitigates-surface-warming

Expand full comment

Does that 86% reduction in population include WEF members ?

Expand full comment
author

Haha! That would be a "hell, no"

though I think they would count in the reduction of their bodies were replaced with organoids with direct neural links to their brains!

Expand full comment

25 years would put Gates at 93 yrs. ... possibly resembling Davros of the Daleks by then? https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Davros?file=Davros.jpg

I note the repellent grooming being conducted by "scientific" presstitutes and journavists, re. the desirability of population decline, which has the ringing reemergence of eugenics about it. That didn't turn out so well did it. Here we go again.

Expand full comment