This is photosynthesis: 6CO2 (carbon dioxide) + 6H2O (water) --> C6H12O (one molecule of glucose) + 6O2 (oxygen)
For every molecule of CO2 a plant takes in through a single stoma (little leaf mouth), it loses 10 molecules of water. Abundant CO2 means a plant can reduce the number of stomata in the epidermis of its leaves and, therefore, use water more efficiently. Of course, we know CO2 is vital for photosynthesis and—as the trace amount of atmospheric CO2 gas rises—the Earth becomes greener, particularly in desert regions. Don't believe me, believe the NASA satellites. Any "greenhouse" contribution by CO2 is completely masked by water vapor. But let's not think of "greenhouse" conditions as a bad thing. Without that mechanism the Earth would be a frozen, barren rock. Water vapor is the real greenhouse gas while CO2 simply ensures the survival of all life on our planet. We really could use twice the amount. Earth is just 250 parts per million (0.025%) CO2 above the extinction of all life upon it. Anyone using the term "carbon pollution" is one of two things—an astounding liar, or an astounding ignoramus.
I have been a CAGW skeptic for about 12 years now. I have distilled it to 3 easy points:
CO2 has been much higher in the past: >4000ppm or 10 times as high.
The CO2 - warming correlation in Al Gore's mockumentary has heat preceding CO2 by 800 years in every cycle. This is agreed by all 'climate' scientists and the IPCC. Effect cannot precede cause, the absolutely most basic principle of science. This single point invalidates the entire premise.
The theoretical relationship between CO2 and heat is logarithmic, meaning a doubling of CO2 is required for each 1.5-2 C rise in temps. At this point, CO2 has risen by perhaps 25% since the industrial age. A true doubling (to 600ppm) is extremely unlikely, and a second beyond that (1200 ppm) is impossible.
Yes. Methane releases and super volcanoes (Yellowstone) worry me far more for the air. Avoidable land and ocean fill pollution should be target. I think micro plastics could emerge as an existential threat to the global food chain - including us.
There is so much evidence of the "snow" job being perpetrated it beggars belief.
Technology (minireactors?) will eventually make existing battery and other technologies obsolete, but that could be decades away. In the meanwhile, the capacity required from renewables and (even the latest) lithium batteries is dozens of times greater than global GDP.
whilst government debt already means that countries are bankrupt. if inflation persists at over 5%, interest rates will need to increase to a few per cent higher until the labor market cracks and unemployment jumps to around 8%,
the debt servicing costs of US government debt just increase by a (paltry) 2% and cracks are emerging. 2% of 31 trillion US government debt. implies a cost of 620 billion per annum - not immediately, but as debt matures and is replaced. state and local debt is around 3.6 trillion, with states like illinois already bankrupt as they implement "woke" policies whilst business and people fllee.
remember that "tosser" jon oliver with his stunt of hundred scientists claiming the "world dies screaming" and one scientist saying "no". he needs to go to a uighyr re-education camp for a decade, just to eradicate his delusions to aspire to commie red.
Agree that existential threat comes from what you cite in 1st 3 paras above, but Tony Heller is not the sort of person to wake up the climate alarmists. He just eggs them on particularly via his nemesis Potholer54, ex BBC journalist Peter Hadfield. The 2 spend their time supposedly debunking each other, with respective fans cheering or jeering them on such that never the twain shall meet .... so waste of time. In order to wake up some of the intelligent but misguided (especially) young people in the alarmist movement, I would cite a physicist like Murry Salby, an American professor who was kicked out of an Australian university a few years back for going against the narrative. You may already know the man. If not, this lecture he gave 4 years ago convinced me the narrative I suspected was BS actually was BS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1cGqL9y548&t=10s He has done many other lectures as well. He is brilliant.
The analogy with the drains of different sizes of drains in a swimming pool v the different absorption factors of CO2 in the atmosphere is brilliant and should be sufficient to blow up the IPCC entirely. Pseudo science enforced by coercion, censorship and intimidation v real science where you guess, you prove or disprove as the nature of scientific discovery and the scientific method is what we face.
The societal costs of NOT debating all sides of a theory are extremely high. Diagnosing causes of Space shuttle explosions, power cuts, growth in food bank usage etc are all CAUSED by the misallocation of resources to the "GREEN NEW STEAL" rather than enlightenment.
The same applied to the C19 pandemic from start to finish - dogma v real solutions.
Thanks for taking the time to watch it. Macquarie university should be ashamed of themselves. They apparently lumbered this brilliant professor with a bunch of junior (political) science students, totally brainwashed and no doubt clueless in laws of physics. No wonder he refused to teach them. They absolutely destroyed this man's career and reputation and I am inclined to think this may have something to do with his early passing.
I just checked wiki on Salby. He died this year. His wiki page doesn't give his date of birth but I think he would have been in his early 70s. Maybe another jab victim or maybe all the stress and the smearing got the better of him.
Bus says "Porte de St Cloud" which is near southern outlet and close to posh arrondissements of Paris. If they dared do same towards Porte de la Chapelle, Clignancourt, St Ouen in northern Paris, they'd get runover for sure.
Well done the Frenchman!
At last 1 of the scrotes in the UK has been found guilty.
This is photosynthesis: 6CO2 (carbon dioxide) + 6H2O (water) --> C6H12O (one molecule of glucose) + 6O2 (oxygen)
For every molecule of CO2 a plant takes in through a single stoma (little leaf mouth), it loses 10 molecules of water. Abundant CO2 means a plant can reduce the number of stomata in the epidermis of its leaves and, therefore, use water more efficiently. Of course, we know CO2 is vital for photosynthesis and—as the trace amount of atmospheric CO2 gas rises—the Earth becomes greener, particularly in desert regions. Don't believe me, believe the NASA satellites. Any "greenhouse" contribution by CO2 is completely masked by water vapor. But let's not think of "greenhouse" conditions as a bad thing. Without that mechanism the Earth would be a frozen, barren rock. Water vapor is the real greenhouse gas while CO2 simply ensures the survival of all life on our planet. We really could use twice the amount. Earth is just 250 parts per million (0.025%) CO2 above the extinction of all life upon it. Anyone using the term "carbon pollution" is one of two things—an astounding liar, or an astounding ignoramus.
I have been a CAGW skeptic for about 12 years now. I have distilled it to 3 easy points:
CO2 has been much higher in the past: >4000ppm or 10 times as high.
The CO2 - warming correlation in Al Gore's mockumentary has heat preceding CO2 by 800 years in every cycle. This is agreed by all 'climate' scientists and the IPCC. Effect cannot precede cause, the absolutely most basic principle of science. This single point invalidates the entire premise.
The theoretical relationship between CO2 and heat is logarithmic, meaning a doubling of CO2 is required for each 1.5-2 C rise in temps. At this point, CO2 has risen by perhaps 25% since the industrial age. A true doubling (to 600ppm) is extremely unlikely, and a second beyond that (1200 ppm) is impossible.
Yes. Methane releases and super volcanoes (Yellowstone) worry me far more for the air. Avoidable land and ocean fill pollution should be target. I think micro plastics could emerge as an existential threat to the global food chain - including us.
There is so much evidence of the "snow" job being perpetrated it beggars belief.
Technology (minireactors?) will eventually make existing battery and other technologies obsolete, but that could be decades away. In the meanwhile, the capacity required from renewables and (even the latest) lithium batteries is dozens of times greater than global GDP.
whilst government debt already means that countries are bankrupt. if inflation persists at over 5%, interest rates will need to increase to a few per cent higher until the labor market cracks and unemployment jumps to around 8%,
the debt servicing costs of US government debt just increase by a (paltry) 2% and cracks are emerging. 2% of 31 trillion US government debt. implies a cost of 620 billion per annum - not immediately, but as debt matures and is replaced. state and local debt is around 3.6 trillion, with states like illinois already bankrupt as they implement "woke" policies whilst business and people fllee.
remember that "tosser" jon oliver with his stunt of hundred scientists claiming the "world dies screaming" and one scientist saying "no". he needs to go to a uighyr re-education camp for a decade, just to eradicate his delusions to aspire to commie red.
Agree that existential threat comes from what you cite in 1st 3 paras above, but Tony Heller is not the sort of person to wake up the climate alarmists. He just eggs them on particularly via his nemesis Potholer54, ex BBC journalist Peter Hadfield. The 2 spend their time supposedly debunking each other, with respective fans cheering or jeering them on such that never the twain shall meet .... so waste of time. In order to wake up some of the intelligent but misguided (especially) young people in the alarmist movement, I would cite a physicist like Murry Salby, an American professor who was kicked out of an Australian university a few years back for going against the narrative. You may already know the man. If not, this lecture he gave 4 years ago convinced me the narrative I suspected was BS actually was BS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1cGqL9y548&t=10s He has done many other lectures as well. He is brilliant.
Many thanks for this excellent presentation.
The analogy with the drains of different sizes of drains in a swimming pool v the different absorption factors of CO2 in the atmosphere is brilliant and should be sufficient to blow up the IPCC entirely. Pseudo science enforced by coercion, censorship and intimidation v real science where you guess, you prove or disprove as the nature of scientific discovery and the scientific method is what we face.
The societal costs of NOT debating all sides of a theory are extremely high. Diagnosing causes of Space shuttle explosions, power cuts, growth in food bank usage etc are all CAUSED by the misallocation of resources to the "GREEN NEW STEAL" rather than enlightenment.
The same applied to the C19 pandemic from start to finish - dogma v real solutions.
Thanks again
Thanks for taking the time to watch it. Macquarie university should be ashamed of themselves. They apparently lumbered this brilliant professor with a bunch of junior (political) science students, totally brainwashed and no doubt clueless in laws of physics. No wonder he refused to teach them. They absolutely destroyed this man's career and reputation and I am inclined to think this may have something to do with his early passing.
A loss to us all. His work remains accessible on one of my "go to" sites on the climate and energy
https://wattsupwiththat.com/
I just checked wiki on Salby. He died this year. His wiki page doesn't give his date of birth but I think he would have been in his early 70s. Maybe another jab victim or maybe all the stress and the smearing got the better of him.
Bus says "Porte de St Cloud" which is near southern outlet and close to posh arrondissements of Paris. If they dared do same towards Porte de la Chapelle, Clignancourt, St Ouen in northern Paris, they'd get runover for sure.