19 million vaxx-deaths worldwide by end 2023. A program to treat the vaxxed should have started in November 2022 when I first recommended it. Millions of vaxxed lives can be saved.
Let’s just say the shot IS a bioweapon designed to kill people. Wouldn’t it be amazingly sinister to get undesirables to “self snitch” by changing the word “untermensch” to “at risk”….
“Genetic abnormalities? Lower quality person? Minority status? You’re at risk! Step right up for the shot today!”
People over 65 were never studied in the trials. So why on earth would you recommend a drug to the very group that you did NOT test? Prior to this v@((*ne scam we NEVER advised the group NOT tested to get the drug - and we certainly never PRIORITIZED them. The only thing that I can conclude is because maybe you intend to kill them off?? Maybe it's because you want to save money from your Social Security/Retirement system. Just wondering because when things don't add up it usually is revealed from the money trail.
Or is it 180 degrees?
Mea cupla!
Too little, too late...
THE COVID AND CLIMATE CHRONICLES - The Big Cull
________________________________________
Originally Summarized as CorrectPredictions.ca by Allan MacRae.
I identified the Covid-19 scam in Feb2020 and published on 21March2020: NO Harmful Lockdowns!
I wrote Kenney, Notley and other Alberta and Canadian politicians on 8Jan2021 - NO Toxic "Vaccines"!
"The ability to correctly predict is the best objective measure of scientific and technical competence."
________________________________________
13 MILLION COVID-19 VAXX-CAUSED DEATHS to end2022.
https://allanmacrae.substack.com/p/13-million-covid-19-vaxx-caused-deaths
19 million vaxx-deaths worldwide by end 2023. A program to treat the vaxxed should have started in November 2022 when I first recommended it. Millions of vaxxed lives can be saved.
Sincere condolences, Allan MacRae, Calgary
Let’s just say the shot IS a bioweapon designed to kill people. Wouldn’t it be amazingly sinister to get undesirables to “self snitch” by changing the word “untermensch” to “at risk”….
“Genetic abnormalities? Lower quality person? Minority status? You’re at risk! Step right up for the shot today!”
People over 65 were never studied in the trials. So why on earth would you recommend a drug to the very group that you did NOT test? Prior to this v@((*ne scam we NEVER advised the group NOT tested to get the drug - and we certainly never PRIORITIZED them. The only thing that I can conclude is because maybe you intend to kill them off?? Maybe it's because you want to save money from your Social Security/Retirement system. Just wondering because when things don't add up it usually is revealed from the money trail.