Is “Informed Consent” a legal right?

From here:

Medicated Murder | Childrens Health Defense

The first 45 minutes or so discusses how “vaccines” prescribed at the drop of a hat are causing psychological impacts that may have led to murderous impulses and violent episodes in adults and children. Worth a listen.

But I want to focus on the last segment, starting at the 48:30 minute mark about “informed consent”.

It has to do with a legal challenge to be heard, an appeal, after a lower court endorsed Rutgers University maintenance of a “vaccine” mandate.

This is after the Supreme Court threw out an appeal against a similar mandate for Penn State University.

Firstly, of course, there is no “vaccine”. It is an injection of contaminated toxins that have no characteristics that remotely resemble a “vaccine”. In fact, it has been proven conclusively that the injections do not prevent infection, transmission, hospitalization or death. In fact there were more harms in the injected group than the placebo group in Phase 3 clinical trials AND the harms in the (short) 3 month post-marketing authorization reports were way in excess of historical safety norms and standards.

That is before the fraudulent RT-PCR tests, uselessness of face masks and futility of lockdowns are taken into account.

The appeal will attempt to present evidence of harms – evidence refused by the entire legal system, up to and including the Supreme Court of the US.

Even more significant, is the principle of “informed consent”.

The injections were approved under “Emergency Use Authorization”. The injections were and are EXPERIMENTAL.

Importantly the injections have been proven to contain markedly different and contaminated ingredients than the ingredients and proportions used in the clinical trials.

The ingredients of doses are adulterated. Here is just one code that has been breached. There are many others.

U.S.C. Title 21 - FOOD AND DRUGS (govinfo.gov)

(100) How many breaches of Section 21 US Code have there been - let us count the ways (substack.com)

The decision by the lower court to allow Rutgers to mandate injections, represents a decision to allow human experimentation, WITHOUT WARNING OF THE RISKS of the experimental injections.

The US withdrew the health emergency over a month ago. There are no medical, scientific or legal grounds for a “vaccine” mandate.

Why is Rutgers doing this? Have a guess. If you guessed “because it enables Pfizer and Moderna to engage in clinical trials of experimental treatments for Pfizer and Moderna, you are smarter than the average bear!

This sort of “research assistance” hides the much smaller direct donations that you might find here.

Budget Facts | Rutgers University

Pfizer Awards Rutgers Major Grant - New York City | MetroMBA – just the odd 340,000 bucks from 4 years ago.

We know that the US Constitution was suspended almost every single Constitutional Amendment designed to prevent government by tyrannical colonial masters was thrown aside during the pandemic.

We know that tyrants imposed full blown apartheid against those contra-indicated for the injections or who were smart or who were “conscientious objectors”.

Now, there is the chance for an appeals court to decide whether “informed consent” about an experimental treatment – that has resulted in “more harm than good”, without preventing infection, transmission, hospitalization or death.

Informed consent – much like the freedom of expression to debate and challenge the “status quo” – is about to be put on trial.

Fingers crossed that the legal system has the quality to determine the correct outcome. “Informed consent” is a fundamental and basic human right.

All “vaccine” mandates are coerced, forced, use blackmail as incentives in order to inject experimental and toxic bacteria that have been adulterated by poor manufacturing processes.

Onwards

Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan  - Buying just one Ko-Fi a week  for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!