The judge agreed with the evidence presented by the AG. which being prosecution has only the evidence favorable for prosecution. as for fraud committed on banks and insurance companies with a gaggle of lawyers I wouldn't feel like i was the smartest lawyer around if I let my bank or Insurance company enter into any agreement that i failed to do my due diligence on. And banks don't care about loosing money because it is protected by government. if they loose the savings they invest then it gets refunded by the government. a Cushey deal don't you think? lets look again where the fraud lays. I see no claim that trump failed to pay back the loans. so no damages? where is the lawsuit?-------------I, Grampa
Defraud banks? well I am no expert in banking or real-estate but if I were giving out loans on property I would have my appraiser involved giving me its actual worth. if loans were given and not repaid then fraud would be involved. so were loans repaid? or did they go into receivership and forced to be sold at less than market value? why do we not hear about the mechanics and the compliance of the loan?
The fraud wouldn't come from inflating the value it would come from not repaying or refusing to pay the loan. has that happened? and shame on any bank that doesn't do diligent on its business.-------------------I, Grampa
Stop with the corrupt judges. NY banking law allows banks to demand accountability for what you put on a loan application. If you lie, that is a legal offense. At the level of Trump's lies it is criminal at a high level. How about accepting the fact that Trump is a crook, a white collar criminal but a criminal nonetheless. Maybe if people actually looked at the behaviors and stopped trying to promote an idol that does not deserve such adoration people would be able to talk and promote real justice for the public which is the essence of this case.
At some point Trump just has to look at these corrupt judges and prosecutors and tell them to kiss his ass, they ain't getting nothing and to go f their corrupt selves. Playtime is over. They are criminals. Using the color of law to victimize Trump.
Something isn't right with this story. Once the defendant demands a jury, the issue of the "facts" belongs to the jury, and the judge is limited to ruling on matters of law, also requiring the judge to defer to the JURY'S findings of fact.
If this judge preemptively "ruled" on matters of fact, and further made statements about HIS findings of fact, while denying the defendant their right to a jury, this is grounds to vacate the judge's orders and disqualify this judge.
I have a hard time believing Trump's lawyers would've waived his right to a jury. And I don't understand (legally) what's going on here. There is now a JUDGEMENT in play? It sounds all mixed up.
The judge agreed with the evidence presented by the AG. which being prosecution has only the evidence favorable for prosecution. as for fraud committed on banks and insurance companies with a gaggle of lawyers I wouldn't feel like i was the smartest lawyer around if I let my bank or Insurance company enter into any agreement that i failed to do my due diligence on. And banks don't care about loosing money because it is protected by government. if they loose the savings they invest then it gets refunded by the government. a Cushey deal don't you think? lets look again where the fraud lays. I see no claim that trump failed to pay back the loans. so no damages? where is the lawsuit?-------------I, Grampa
Defraud banks? well I am no expert in banking or real-estate but if I were giving out loans on property I would have my appraiser involved giving me its actual worth. if loans were given and not repaid then fraud would be involved. so were loans repaid? or did they go into receivership and forced to be sold at less than market value? why do we not hear about the mechanics and the compliance of the loan?
The fraud wouldn't come from inflating the value it would come from not repaying or refusing to pay the loan. has that happened? and shame on any bank that doesn't do diligent on its business.-------------------I, Grampa
Exactly!
So what, every major borrower from Citibank did the same
Don’t believe anything that she says.
Can’t wait until the US White Hats arrest her.
Stop with the corrupt judges. NY banking law allows banks to demand accountability for what you put on a loan application. If you lie, that is a legal offense. At the level of Trump's lies it is criminal at a high level. How about accepting the fact that Trump is a crook, a white collar criminal but a criminal nonetheless. Maybe if people actually looked at the behaviors and stopped trying to promote an idol that does not deserve such adoration people would be able to talk and promote real justice for the public which is the essence of this case.
Ridiculous! You know who’s a treasonous criminal? Biden
🙏😡😞
At some point Trump just has to look at these corrupt judges and prosecutors and tell them to kiss his ass, they ain't getting nothing and to go f their corrupt selves. Playtime is over. They are criminals. Using the color of law to victimize Trump.
Something isn't right with this story. Once the defendant demands a jury, the issue of the "facts" belongs to the jury, and the judge is limited to ruling on matters of law, also requiring the judge to defer to the JURY'S findings of fact.
If this judge preemptively "ruled" on matters of fact, and further made statements about HIS findings of fact, while denying the defendant their right to a jury, this is grounds to vacate the judge's orders and disqualify this judge.
I have a hard time believing Trump's lawyers would've waived his right to a jury. And I don't understand (legally) what's going on here. There is now a JUDGEMENT in play? It sounds all mixed up.