Legal developments in Australia – detailing how the C19 shots are not a vaccine but are the injections of GMO and should be regulated as such

Here is an email published unedited and in full.

First a brief comment: I can’t help but get the feeling that governments globally enacted simultaneous C19 measures because of the “One World Government” requirements contained in the existing International Health Regulations.

In other words, all national laws globally are subordinate to these regulations and no civil or criminal laws apply.

Certainly under the revisions to the regulations this will be the case. “One World Government” will be the law with no redress or representation or argument – unless the leaders of country send a letter saying “NO!!!!!” to the amendments and the new pandemic treaty. Anyway, here is the email.

Email begins:

.. as my last note ended

this has only just started

and apologies, this note requires i take you into the legal world .. but needs must, and you will see why

our GMO civil law proceedings against Pfizer and Moderna require we establish two things:

The LNP-modRNA and LNP-modDNA complexes in their products satisfy Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOs, and

Pfizer and Moderna knew, or ought to have known, their products satisfied the legal definitions.

.. once legal knowledge is established that Pfizer and Moderna knew, or ought to have known, their products satisfied the GMO definitions, then at law they will be deemed to have always known they needed to first obtain GMO licenses from Australia's Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), before they could have sought provisional approvals from the TGA

.. now that excessive synthetic DNA contamination has been discovered, there is no way in hell these products could ever have been granted GMO licenses

.. and, had the OGTR done its job and told Pfizer and Moderna they needed to first apply for GMO licenses, when they first came a knockin, and the OGTR performed a proper Risk Assessment on the heels of any such GMO applications, the risks to human health from the LNP-modRNA complexes alone should have seen both companies denied GMO licenses, thereby barring them from seeking approvals from the TGA

but, the OGTR went MIA

.. and strangely, right when a national (indeed, global) rollout of these transfection products was being called for

strange, that

returning to our GMO case ..

once legal knowledge is shown in Pfizer and Moderna, then, having not sought and been granted (maybe, possibly) the requisite GMO licenses means since 2021 they have continued to commit serious criminal offences here in Australia, where serious means serious

.. but our GMO proceedings fall under Civil Law, where we have to oddly show these serious criminal offences are occuring, in order for the Court to be satisfied to issue the injunctions we seek, for stopping Pfizer and Moderna from any further dealings with their C19 drugs in Australia

'So what about those serious criminal offences' .. I hear you chorus?

.. hold my beer

now ..

.. look at the attached when you are done reading this note

Together with lawyers Peter Fam, Katie Ashby-Koppens, and PJ O'Brien, and three brilliant PhDs in the biological sciences, and two Professors who kindly proofed our materials .. we produced the attached Brief of Information & Evidence

.. for Criminal proceedings

.. an almost identical version of the attached was presented to the Australian Federal Police (AFP) on 6 September, proving to be the hottest potato in AFP history

the AFP initially had the gall to send the Brief to the OGTR to investigate

.. sent right back to the fox's den

we remonstrated and demanded the AFP recall the Brief, and do the job they are mandated to do - investigate serious criminal offences

.. to date junior cops within the AFP are bouncing responsibility for the Brief around the office, while these same servants of the people are mysteriously falling ill and having to go on sick leave, leaving no one responsible for advancing the investigation

this hot potato BS would be comical were not for the fact that by this AFP charade performance, they are preventing an assessment of the Brief's credibility, which would necessitate criminal indictments be issued against Pfizer and Moderna .. which would necessitate an immediate suspension of the C19 products .. which would save Australians from ongoing and preventable deaths and injuries from these products

.. but the AFP does not care, currently .. the task is within their paygrade, but the risks to professional advancement are obvious in light of the political implications

your tax dollars on display .. the AFP on full display showing the world how much they basically don't give a sh*t about human life .. until they are told to

.. they have had this pretty simple to understand Brief for one month now .. one month, and advanced it like a glacier

appreciating we would likely find ourselves dealing with this cruel show by the AFP, we took steps to gain assistance

.. enter the courageous Senator Gerard Rennick

on 27 September Senator Rennick presented the Attorney-General of Australia, Mark Dreyfus, a copy of the Brief

Australia's Attorney-General is responsible for the proper functioning of the Australian Federal Police

Senator Rennick's cover note to the A-G reads:

(Ed: apologies if this is illegible - best I could do!)

.. the last paragraph poignantly posits by implication, that Australia may likely be in the midst of a national emergency .. indeed, a GMO catastrophe:

Given the exposure of circa 80% of the population to these Products, and the ongoing administration of these

Products as primary and booster doses, this is a serious issue of national importance,

which I bring to your attention as the Attorney-General of Australia.

last week we also confirmed that Senator Malcolm Roberts supports Senator Rennick on the importance and need for an urgent investigation, and the informing of all Australians of what has possibly occurred - the nationwide contamination of Australian citizens with GMOs - and the need to inform Australian Health Practitioners in order that they may investigate and consider treatments in response.

In the days and weeks ahead we expect other Australian politicians we are trying to make contact with about this threat to Australia's health and Genome, will become most vocal

.. but is it a threat .. or rather one of the causes of the harms and deaths we have seen to date? .. the long established science literature is not ambivalent about genomic integration, nor the concurrent ability of synthetic DNA to cause innumerable varieties of genetic disorders

.. these are the facts we must acknowledge, become responsible for, and discuss robustly

Federal Member of Parliament Russell Broadbent has been coming to terms with the Briefing materials, and has already come out swinging, appropriately outraged

the above is the beginning of much more that is required to be done ..

.. raising attention with all those gaslit into taking these products

.. assisting people to understand

.. informing C19 'vaccine' victims so to assist them with their difficult journeys for correct treatments

.. informing medical professional to investigate these GMOs and the modes of action they take for producing harms, for finding treatment solutions

.. for informing legislators everywhere of what has occurred, and what they need to prevent from occurring again .. ever

if you are an Australian reading this .. share it .. push it out widely .. get folk reading just the first 23 pages of the attached .. it is an easy read

if you are overseas reading this

.. UK, EU, and South African gene technology legislation is almost identical to what we have in Australia

.. but your drug regulators let Pfizer and Moderna flout those GMO laws, and your regulators and health politicians did not inform your fellow citizens they were being asked/coerced to receive GMOs

.. let alone experimental drugs also containing synthetic DNA contamination

.. Katie Ashby-Koppens is currently in Europe and the UK for meetings with properly concerned MPs and MEPs for stepping them through an appreciation of the materials .. get in touch with me if we can assist you good folk overseas

together with the References provided at the end of the webpage in the link above, this coming 9 September the World Council for Health is presenting an Urgent Expert Hearing into the global DNA contamination

.. click the pic to register your online seat

(Ed: click the link below, rather than the pic)

Urgent Expert Hearing on Reports of DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccines (worldcouncilforhealth.org)

we are now in the realm of science fiction become fact

.. so it is we who must become the responsible ones, for those effected and injured now

.. and for those to come in future generations, when this all kicks off into another dimension we never thought possible

Julian Gillespie

LLB, BJuris

One attachment • Scanned by Gmail

(Ed: Unfortunately I cannot attach the document, but here are a few pages of it.)

PJ O’Brien & Associates

PO Box 916

The Junction

NSW 2291

27 September 2023

Attorney-General

Robert Garran Offices

3-5 National Circuit

BARTON ACT 2600

Attention: Hon Mark Dreyfus KC MP, Attorney-General

and Hon Matt Thistlethwaite MP, Assistant Minister for the Republic.

Dear Messrs

BRIEF OF INFORMATION & EVIDENCE

AS FILED WITH THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE

Alleged Offence: Dealing with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) without a license

Defendants: Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd and Moderna Australia Pty Ltd
Pfizer and Moderna’s Covid-19 mRNA products are or contain GMOs

Preface

Under Section 13 of the Crimes Act 1914 Dr Julian Fidge has the right to institute proceedings for the commitment for trial of Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd and Moderna Australia Pty Ltd, in respect of the indictable offences set forth under Section 32 and Section 33 of the Gene Technology Act 2000.

Instituting criminal proceedings is a matter of urgency in light of the continued dealing and supply of the Covid-19 products by Pfizer and Moderna in Australia, which for containing genetically modified organisms, GMOs, including synthetic DNA contamination as another form of GMO, continue to threaten and/or actually cause irreparable harm to recipients, including death, and including irreversible alterations to the natural chromosomal DNA of recipients, which changes are inherited by offspring. These threats, harms, and irreversible alterations to chromosomal DNA have likely already been experienced by a significant number of Australians. These Covid-19 products are still available to Australians who can, with the institution of the proceedings described here, avoid these harms or the greater likelihood of these harms that exposure/s to these products would result in.

1.                Commissioner Kershaw, our office has been instructed to provide your office by way of this correspondence the opportunity to consider this brief of information and evidence, so that your office may determine whether it is more appropriate given the seriousness of the matters and allegations detailed below, that the Australian Federal Police institute the proceedings described in the preface.

2.                Commissioner Kershaw, your office is in a position to prevent further threatened or actual harm to recipients, including death, and including irreversible alterations to the natural chromosomal DNA of recipients, which changes are inherited by offspring.

3.                In the event your office confirms it is unwilling to institute the proceedings described in the preface, our office has been instructed to institute those proceedings.

4.                We appreciate the subject is confronting and involves crimes never before perpetrated in Australia to such an extent, involving so many Australians. Equally, though the science on the adverse effects consequent upon infiltration by GMOs is extensive, particularly as it relates to effects when certain forms of GMO enter the nucleus of cells, never before in human history have we experienced a mass contamination of a population with GMOs known to seriously dysregulate or silence and alter the integrity of natural human DNA. We Sir are in uncharted waters, a fact all readers of this information must reconcile themselves with.

5.                Separately, and on behalf of Dr Fidge, our firm has already instituted civil proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia (VID510/2023) on 6 July 2023, pursuant to Section 147 of the Gene Technology Act 2000 (the GT Act), seeking the remedy of injunction from any further dealing by the Respondents with their Covid-19 products in Australia, due to the failure by each Respondent to first obtain GMO licenses under the Gene Technology Act 2000 for each of their Covid-19 products, which failures and the Respondents’ subsequent and ongoing dealings with the products in Australia without the required GMO licenses, constitute serious and ongoing criminal offences as described in preface. As those are civil proceedings the onus of proof is the balance of probabilities. Further details available here.

Summary

6.         A concise summary of how these products constitute GMOs follows.

Defining GMOs

7.         The Covid-19 vaccines (both the monovalent and bivalent products) produced by Pfizer and Moderna satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly deemed Genetically Modified Organisms, GMOs, pursuant to section 10 of the Gene Technology Act 2000.

8.         The relevant definitions are applied in the context of the products containing 'LNP-modRNA complexes' and ‘LNP-modDNA complexes’. These are accepted scientific terms. The prefix ‘mod’ stands for modified for correctly denoting the RNA and DNA within the products is synthetic and manmade. These terms are used by Pfizer and Moderna. They are complexes where in the case of the modRNA, the modRNA would have no effect or value or purported benefit without first being bound and encapsulated in LNPs for transport and delivery of the modRNA throughout the human body. For any purported benefit to be derived the two components must be combined into complexes (ie LNP-modRNA), using scientific manufacturing processes, before any therapeutic value can possibly be derived by the use of the components.

Note – modDNA contamination: The LNP-modDNA complexes were recently discovered to be present in the Covid-19 products of both Pfizer and Moderna and represent serious and excessive contamination of those products. Those findings have been verified by other independent laboratories.

9.         Relevantly, the LNP-modRNA and LNP-modDNA complexes each fulfill the definition of Organism, which means:

"organism" means any biological entity that is:
                     (a)  viable; or
                     (b)  capable of reproduction; or
                     (c)  capable of transferring genetic material.

10.       Breaking down the definition.

11.       First, the LNP-modRNA and LNP-modDNA complexes fulfill being 'any biological entity'.  The chief ingredient in the Pfizer and Moderna products are the nucleoside-modified RNAs (modRNA) which is genetic material.

12.       “Any biological entity” is not defined in the GT Act, so the ordinary meaning of the words apply.  This was confirmed in an email from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) on 6 February 2023.

13.       In support of this is both Pfizer and Moderna’s applications to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) for provisional approval of their Covid-19 products as a “New biological entity” submission for each of their products.[1]

14.       Secondly, the LNP-modRNA and LNP-modDNA complexes do and are 'capable of transferring genetic material', insofar that the LNP encapsulating the modRNA/modDNA bio-distributes throughout the human body, and directly assists to transfer (transfect) the modRNA/modDNA across cell membranes and into the cytoplasm of cells of all organ types and classes, including the brain, heart, kidneys, liver, testes, ovaries, with as yet unknown effects/risks of transfection/exposure for unborn children.

15.       This encapsulation, transport, and transfection using LNPs involves the physical 'transferring of genetic material' (the modRNA and modDNA) throughout the body of recipients.

16.       Some parts of the modDNA contamination is also capable of reproduction, in that it is replication competent in some cells, meaning it can self-replicate independently within human cells. See the report of Dr Angela Jeanes below.17.            Having satisfied the above, it then follows, a:

"genetically modified organism" means:
                     (a)  an organism that has been modified by gene technology;

[1] Pfizer Monovalent: https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/auspmd/comirnaty

Pfizer Bivalent: https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/auspmd/comirnaty-originalomicron-ba1-covid-19-vaccine

Moderna Monovalent: https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/auspmd/spikevax

Moderna Bivalent: https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/auspar/auspar-spikevax-bivalent-originalomicron-ba4-5

18.       Where:

"gene technology" means any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material.

19.       The degree of genetic modifications involved in the creation of the modRNA is beyond question and well settled.

That’s the end of the extract from the attachment.

Onwards!

Please buy a subscription or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 coffee a week!