4 Comments

1. Asking such questions would be unethical.

2. Which is why the only reasonable answer would be: “I cannot recall.”

Spelling errors throughout the text may be a good way of signaling “human-written”, but I bet writing a piece of code to embed x errors every y lines would not be a problem :-)

Expand full comment
author

I am so sorry. I appreciate how irritating poor quality is. Me Culpa. I have subjected my lap top to a screen magnifier so that I can more clearly see the errors.

Thank you for pointing this out and your patience.

I so subject the articles to MS Word and Grammar checks, plus scan the article before posting to catch typos in the SubStack editor. It does not help to have a small screen and a keypad that is somewhat "disobedient" when it comes to navigating between letters that seem to dislike being pressed and an auto-correct that insists on putting "I" instead of "in"!!

Apologies again.

Expand full comment

All spellcheckers are limited to dead entries, though. Force, forge, forte will all be legitimate for the machine, for example.

Some authors speak their texts into transcribing software, which can bring out much more fun than expected.

Your content is far more important than occasional errors. Thank you for enlightening texts.

Expand full comment

Calling the shots “experimental” hides intent.

Expand full comment