Injections contain many deadly inserts as well as the poisonous spike protein that can end up anywhere regardless of dosage – billions of lives at risk – dress rehearsals of global pandemic for decades – WHO has no medical or epidemiological competence – plus lots more
Great interview, and it confirms my haunch that the toxicity had been intentional ,because if it had been only about money, they could have produced a vax less harmful.
I may have missed the bit on HIV inserts or maybe you're referring to Tim Truth 2021 compilation. I recall Dr Richard Fleming speaking at length about HIV inserts based on genomic sequence over 2 years ago. Prof. Luc Montagnier also mentioned them in April 2020 on a French MSM channel (CNews I think), after which he was forever banned on French MSM. Montagnier also said he thought the spike protein was initially developed for an HIV vaccine. An Indian laboratory also did a paper on same, but were forced to retract it shortly after. Then there was the covid vaccine trialled in Brisbane university where the participants contracted HIV & the trial was shut down. They were said to be false positives. It's true there hasn't been much talk about it since apart from possible link to vaccine-induced aids.
Did you notice that Polly Tommy cut off Dr Mumpton around 25 min. mark and forgot to put her back on? I also noticed that the description under the interview doesn't correspond to what Yeadon exposed. What he exposed was his opinion that there was no novel virus in the first place. Of course they all smiled sweetly and moved on. I imagine they have clear instructions not to touch the subject.
Something I did learn was that the document on infectious diseases/pandemics published by League of Nations in 1924 (Russian version) made no reference to the Spanish 'flu.
Yes. I recall the mention of HIV inserts in the past - but as you "in passing" and not stressed since. I wonder whether that shows up in stains or blots or whatever. The remark on SARS-COV2 being "just another ILI" with no significant impact on mortality does resonate a little. It fits with a narrative that C19 deaths were actually iatrogenic "death by healer" by withholding anti-biotics from false C19 "diagnoses" plus intubation, remdesivir/midazaolm+morphine, withholding of food+water, psychological torture of isolation etc.
The treatment of all deaths with C19 present within 28 days of a shoddy and arbitrary PCR test will take years to "wash out" of accurate diagnostic data on causes of death. What an appalling decision by those in the CDC/FDA that don't practise medicine!
"I wonder whether [HIV inserts] show up in stains or blots or whatever". If you're interested in delving further, see Jikkyleaks - ex-CSIRO (Australia) - who has tweeted profusely on Pfizer's potentially faked western blot trial results. Philip Altman - Australian chemist with extensive regulatory experience - also claims western blot trial results submitted by Pfizer to TGA pre-rollout showed no conclusive proof of presence of spike protein. In short, if there's no proof the injected are producing s2 spike, you won't find the inserts either. Prof. Stefano Scoglio has explained in detail why (he believes) the mRNA injections are not doing what their inventors claim. I don't expect the fuddy-duddies at CHD will take any interest in this and Mike Yeadon doesn't seem to be questioning it either. I found he trod rather lightly throughout interview with CHD compared to past interviews.
Yes. Saw the JikkyLeaks stuff and Jessica Rose's comments too. Impressed with Scoglio - brings a great perspective. Would love to see a zoom or some such with these participants. I don't recall Jikkyleaks mentioning the HIV delivery mechanism (which doesn't mean it wasn't mentioned!).
Yeadon is - like the rest of us - learning as he goes - as in the evolution of the howbadismybatch.com stuff that could be more probably attributed to incredibly poor manufacturing quality by the ...... - whoever in 32 companies in the supply chain - with inadequate quality control by the manufacturers combined with non-existent inspection of batches by any government..... v Yeadon's original supposition that the bad batches were politically motivated or part of the manufacturers extreme experimentation.
No JL didn't mention HIV re. western blot analysis but if injected aren't producing any sars2 spike protein they wouldn't be producing whatever's in the spike, logically. Scoglio says Japanese study on mice done with Pfizer further to FOI request (2021?) showed LNPs throughout the body in same form as they were injected, i.e. unmetabolized by the cells. The tests used to prove existence of spike protein (ELISA, same for HIV) only identify antibodies, which he says are non-specific. He asks why they're not following up with analysis of the antibodies to see if they react to any other toxins, not just the synthetic spike protein, and concludes it's because this is fraud and further that those supporting this thesis are basically bs-artists. So I doubt he'd have any time for Dr Rose et al. On Yeadon, yes, he has allowed his thinking to evolve, unlike most of his peers, but unlikely he'll go much further, maybe for fear of being totally discredited. His attitude towards self-assembling nanoparticles (unfolding before his very eyes during recent zoom mtg with Dr David Nixon) was telling. If we are to help save vax-injured/injured-to-be, we need to know precisely what poisons are in the vials so all concerned scientists should work together. I imagine you're more frustrated than me so I'll leave it at that and let you get on with it!
Great interview, and it confirms my haunch that the toxicity had been intentional ,because if it had been only about money, they could have produced a vax less harmful.
Thx Peter. Listening now.
I have known that since the get go...the downloading of the genetics from the Chinese based on their computerized rendering...and it made me go WTF?
Yes. Every time I see that interview from UK Breakfast TV, I have the same "wtf" reaction.
Assuming this is CHD video you're referring to - https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/friday-roundtable/toxic-by-design-with-michael-yeadon-phd-1676056671675/ - while I haven't finished watching it yet (about 1/3 of way through) - I don't feel I've learned anything new, yet Dr Nass & panel are reacting as if Mike Yeadon's observations are new to them. Maybe this is first time he's been invited on to CHD, which would be surprising actually.
Agreed. (I omitted the link and did an update with it present, mea culpa).
Yeadon has been on CHD more than once. What was new for me was the emphasis on HIV inserts.
For me, the value was in pulling some of the strings together, albeit, again. From that perspective it was a useful hour or so.
I may have missed the bit on HIV inserts or maybe you're referring to Tim Truth 2021 compilation. I recall Dr Richard Fleming speaking at length about HIV inserts based on genomic sequence over 2 years ago. Prof. Luc Montagnier also mentioned them in April 2020 on a French MSM channel (CNews I think), after which he was forever banned on French MSM. Montagnier also said he thought the spike protein was initially developed for an HIV vaccine. An Indian laboratory also did a paper on same, but were forced to retract it shortly after. Then there was the covid vaccine trialled in Brisbane university where the participants contracted HIV & the trial was shut down. They were said to be false positives. It's true there hasn't been much talk about it since apart from possible link to vaccine-induced aids.
Did you notice that Polly Tommy cut off Dr Mumpton around 25 min. mark and forgot to put her back on? I also noticed that the description under the interview doesn't correspond to what Yeadon exposed. What he exposed was his opinion that there was no novel virus in the first place. Of course they all smiled sweetly and moved on. I imagine they have clear instructions not to touch the subject.
Something I did learn was that the document on infectious diseases/pandemics published by League of Nations in 1924 (Russian version) made no reference to the Spanish 'flu.
Yes. I recall the mention of HIV inserts in the past - but as you "in passing" and not stressed since. I wonder whether that shows up in stains or blots or whatever. The remark on SARS-COV2 being "just another ILI" with no significant impact on mortality does resonate a little. It fits with a narrative that C19 deaths were actually iatrogenic "death by healer" by withholding anti-biotics from false C19 "diagnoses" plus intubation, remdesivir/midazaolm+morphine, withholding of food+water, psychological torture of isolation etc.
The treatment of all deaths with C19 present within 28 days of a shoddy and arbitrary PCR test will take years to "wash out" of accurate diagnostic data on causes of death. What an appalling decision by those in the CDC/FDA that don't practise medicine!
"I wonder whether [HIV inserts] show up in stains or blots or whatever". If you're interested in delving further, see Jikkyleaks - ex-CSIRO (Australia) - who has tweeted profusely on Pfizer's potentially faked western blot trial results. Philip Altman - Australian chemist with extensive regulatory experience - also claims western blot trial results submitted by Pfizer to TGA pre-rollout showed no conclusive proof of presence of spike protein. In short, if there's no proof the injected are producing s2 spike, you won't find the inserts either. Prof. Stefano Scoglio has explained in detail why (he believes) the mRNA injections are not doing what their inventors claim. I don't expect the fuddy-duddies at CHD will take any interest in this and Mike Yeadon doesn't seem to be questioning it either. I found he trod rather lightly throughout interview with CHD compared to past interviews.
Yes. Saw the JikkyLeaks stuff and Jessica Rose's comments too. Impressed with Scoglio - brings a great perspective. Would love to see a zoom or some such with these participants. I don't recall Jikkyleaks mentioning the HIV delivery mechanism (which doesn't mean it wasn't mentioned!).
Yeadon is - like the rest of us - learning as he goes - as in the evolution of the howbadismybatch.com stuff that could be more probably attributed to incredibly poor manufacturing quality by the ...... - whoever in 32 companies in the supply chain - with inadequate quality control by the manufacturers combined with non-existent inspection of batches by any government..... v Yeadon's original supposition that the bad batches were politically motivated or part of the manufacturers extreme experimentation.
No JL didn't mention HIV re. western blot analysis but if injected aren't producing any sars2 spike protein they wouldn't be producing whatever's in the spike, logically. Scoglio says Japanese study on mice done with Pfizer further to FOI request (2021?) showed LNPs throughout the body in same form as they were injected, i.e. unmetabolized by the cells. The tests used to prove existence of spike protein (ELISA, same for HIV) only identify antibodies, which he says are non-specific. He asks why they're not following up with analysis of the antibodies to see if they react to any other toxins, not just the synthetic spike protein, and concludes it's because this is fraud and further that those supporting this thesis are basically bs-artists. So I doubt he'd have any time for Dr Rose et al. On Yeadon, yes, he has allowed his thinking to evolve, unlike most of his peers, but unlikely he'll go much further, maybe for fear of being totally discredited. His attitude towards self-assembling nanoparticles (unfolding before his very eyes during recent zoom mtg with Dr David Nixon) was telling. If we are to help save vax-injured/injured-to-be, we need to know precisely what poisons are in the vials so all concerned scientists should work together. I imagine you're more frustrated than me so I'll leave it at that and let you get on with it!