Stating the obvious here: It's true that Pfizer and Muder-na are public companies, meaning that those who own stock in the company actually own the company. However, these "owners" have no say in how the company is run, no say in whether the company cheats, lies, steals, and kills, other than to vote out the CEO (and possibly other corporate officers) at shareholder meetings. The fraudulent trials, the bribing of FDA bureaucrats and other government officials, the bait and switch of using one manufacturing method the trials and another for the public, and the continuation of selling the poison jabs when they knew they were killing people--all of those decisions where made by corporate officers, not the share holders.
There is a UK doctor* on YT, who was fully on board with the virus story and the vaccines.
Over the last few years he began seeing the obvious lies being told and started questioning the entire thing.
His slow awakening has helped to change peoples minds about the jab and the sinister reasons behind it, as he was "one of them" and not an anti vaxxer.
I personally know of people whose awakening has been due to his journey.
Peter - please remind us again what ESG means? And it would be good if you included links for our further education, especially about pension fund investments.
I first ran across ESG as a researcher in the investment department of a consulting actuary i the UK s0me 15 years ago. It sprang out of the compliance section of a ratings system whose main components were business, staff, process, risk, compliance, performance and other. The other section back then was expanded to include ESG.
The “Environmental” aspect looks at how the company affects nature. It checks things like how much it helps or harms the environment, how it uses resources, and its efforts to reduce pollution. This area is all about dealing with climate change and using energy wisely.
The “Social” section is about the company’s relationships with its workers, suppliers, customers, and the communities it operates in. Here, it’s about fair work conditions, respecting diversity, helping local communities, and standing up for human rights.
Lastly, “Governance” is about how well the company is managed. This includes how the company is run, how it pays its top executives, how it keeps honest records, and how it listens to and treats its shareholders.
Some aspects are objective - measurable and desirable - especially the environemntal aspects. There are already employment laws in place that make discrimination illegal, which makes the Social category entirely political. In the old investment research the "goverance" aspect clashed with Business.
The objective of investment managers is to "achieve superior risk adjusted returns over the medum term after fees nd costs" - ESG tends to reduce investment returns and increase investment risks and so, in my view, hurts the investor.
Beyond investment, the issue is just as important , if not more so in the baqnking, finance and insurnce areas - loand and insurance can ve bloced for subjective reasons.
I will try and be more specific about the role of investment managers and how they manage investments in future - suffice to say ,investment maagers may have some retianed profits that they invest BUT THEY DO NOT OWN THE TRILLIONS THAT THEY MANAGER ON BEHALF OF OTHERS - e.g company pension funds and infcifivual investors funds via 401k's and target date funds.
They should also mention that this was a military countermeasure and thus not subject to quality control, fda approval, or anything else. Just alex azar's say so. They all knew IVM and HCQ worked and they did this anyway.
Worse? (can this get any worse?) someone posted recently that Pfizer was using Ivermectin to recover clinical trial participants who had bad reactions. Did this show up earlier? Sorry don't remember who posted this or where, may have been Dr. Pierre Kory...needs verification.
Blackrock actively manages its own funds...and uses an Artificial Intelligence computer to execute it trades and leases it to Vanguard...plus they also do all the Fed Trades and quant easing, so they can unlaod their crap on us. Aladdin is the name of their AI, and they are the ones buying up on the single houses...over 40% of the US single family homes. IT should be illegal and they need to be broken up. Ditto Vanguard, Ditto State Street.
Black Rock also is a major shareholder in most of the Institutional invetors buying up homes...you have to go up the ladder...Just type in the equity /investor firm name and look for major shareholders.
Stating the obvious here: It's true that Pfizer and Muder-na are public companies, meaning that those who own stock in the company actually own the company. However, these "owners" have no say in how the company is run, no say in whether the company cheats, lies, steals, and kills, other than to vote out the CEO (and possibly other corporate officers) at shareholder meetings. The fraudulent trials, the bribing of FDA bureaucrats and other government officials, the bait and switch of using one manufacturing method the trials and another for the public, and the continuation of selling the poison jabs when they knew they were killing people--all of those decisions where made by corporate officers, not the share holders.
Thank you!! Mr. Peter for not giving up 🌻
I just sent that video to my sister, God I pray she watches it. She's taken 4 maybe more jabs so it may be too late for her, I pray it isn't.
I lost count of how many videos I’ve sent to my family and friends ... good luck 🍀 🙏
Oh me too, but I love her and I will continue to try, even if its too late.
There is a UK doctor* on YT, who was fully on board with the virus story and the vaccines.
Over the last few years he began seeing the obvious lies being told and started questioning the entire thing.
His slow awakening has helped to change peoples minds about the jab and the sinister reasons behind it, as he was "one of them" and not an anti vaxxer.
I personally know of people whose awakening has been due to his journey.
Thats great, I just wish more doctors who clearly know the truth would put their morals ahead of their paydays.
Peter - please remind us again what ESG means? And it would be good if you included links for our further education, especially about pension fund investments.
I first ran across ESG as a researcher in the investment department of a consulting actuary i the UK s0me 15 years ago. It sprang out of the compliance section of a ratings system whose main components were business, staff, process, risk, compliance, performance and other. The other section back then was expanded to include ESG.
Here's a couple of links.
https://www.techopedia.com/definition/environmental-social-and-governance-esg
The “Environmental” aspect looks at how the company affects nature. It checks things like how much it helps or harms the environment, how it uses resources, and its efforts to reduce pollution. This area is all about dealing with climate change and using energy wisely.
The “Social” section is about the company’s relationships with its workers, suppliers, customers, and the communities it operates in. Here, it’s about fair work conditions, respecting diversity, helping local communities, and standing up for human rights.
Lastly, “Governance” is about how well the company is managed. This includes how the company is run, how it pays its top executives, how it keeps honest records, and how it listens to and treats its shareholders.
https://www2.deloitte.com/ce/en/pages/global-business-services/articles/esg-explained-1-what-is-esg.html
Some aspects are objective - measurable and desirable - especially the environemntal aspects. There are already employment laws in place that make discrimination illegal, which makes the Social category entirely political. In the old investment research the "goverance" aspect clashed with Business.
The objective of investment managers is to "achieve superior risk adjusted returns over the medum term after fees nd costs" - ESG tends to reduce investment returns and increase investment risks and so, in my view, hurts the investor.
Beyond investment, the issue is just as important , if not more so in the baqnking, finance and insurnce areas - loand and insurance can ve bloced for subjective reasons.
I will try and be more specific about the role of investment managers and how they manage investments in future - suffice to say ,investment maagers may have some retianed profits that they invest BUT THEY DO NOT OWN THE TRILLIONS THAT THEY MANAGER ON BEHALF OF OTHERS - e.g company pension funds and infcifivual investors funds via 401k's and target date funds.
They should also mention that this was a military countermeasure and thus not subject to quality control, fda approval, or anything else. Just alex azar's say so. They all knew IVM and HCQ worked and they did this anyway.
Worse? (can this get any worse?) someone posted recently that Pfizer was using Ivermectin to recover clinical trial participants who had bad reactions. Did this show up earlier? Sorry don't remember who posted this or where, may have been Dr. Pierre Kory...needs verification.
Blackrock actively manages its own funds...and uses an Artificial Intelligence computer to execute it trades and leases it to Vanguard...plus they also do all the Fed Trades and quant easing, so they can unlaod their crap on us. Aladdin is the name of their AI, and they are the ones buying up on the single houses...over 40% of the US single family homes. IT should be illegal and they need to be broken up. Ditto Vanguard, Ditto State Street.
Duchess - great input but please send links to further educate us about what you are saying about buying up single houses etc.
Institutional investors may control 40% of U.S. single-family rental homes by 2030, according to MetLife Investment Management. And a group of Washington, D.C., lawmakers say Wall Street needs to back away from the market.https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/21/how-wall-street-bought-single-family-homes-and-put-them-up-for-rent.html
Black Rock also is a major shareholder in most of the Institutional invetors buying up homes...you have to go up the ladder...Just type in the equity /investor firm name and look for major shareholders.
Like this: Top 10 Owners of Blackstone Inc
Stockholder Stake Shares owned
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 8.30% 58,985,319
Capital Research & Management Co.... 4.56% 32,371,405
BlackRock Fund Advisors 4.44% 31,553,972
SSgA Funds Management, Inc. 3.85% 27,361,588
Now repeat it for every major institution and hedge fund ...you will see the same pattern. Add it up.