Peer reviewed paper revisiting the Phase 3 Clinical Trial studies for Pfizer and Moderna - reveals all the fraud that the FDA saw and ignored – send to regulators, legislative bodies and committees!

POST SCRIPT: Discussed in depth here:

After three years, COVID-19 vaccination campaign declared a failure! (blubrry.com)

Here is the paper:

20240125-8235-1308nlg.pdf (cureus.com)

“COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign”

M. Nathaniel Mead , Stephanie Seneff , Russ Wolfinger , Jessica Rose , Kris Denhaerynck , Steve Kirsch , Peter A. McCullough

The paper revisits the 1% Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) compared to the claimed 95% Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) and highlights a departure from procedures by only representing RRR. How may people would have taken the injections if they had known that it would prevent just one C19 case per 100 cases in the population?

Note also the concept of “number needed to vaccinate” (NNV). The “vaccines were represented as 95% effective in preventing C19, but, given the ARR, it would take on average 142 injections to prevent one case using Pfizer and 88 using Moderna, based on the Phase 3 clinical studies.

All of Pfizer, Moderna, the FDA, the CDC and their company boards and governing bodies committed the crime of NOT CORRECTING the narrative to highlight these numbers.

“An absolute risk reduction of approximately 1% for the COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations meant that a substantial number of individuals would need to be injected in order to prevent a single mild-to-moderate case of COVID-19. Specifically, the NNV to prevent one case of COVID-19 would be 142 (range 122-170) for the BNT162b2 injection and 88 (range 76-104) for the mRNA-1273 injection, respectively [65]. These numbers increase with age and depending on the variant [70]. The NNV is an interpretable and salient metric for assessing real-world impact, enabling us to gauge the potential benefits derived from vaccination. For any relatively healthy population (with minimal comorbidities), the risk-benefit profile with a high NNV could easily point to excessive harms.”

Here is the evidence of intentional fraud committed by Pfizer – again this would have been obvious to any skilled regulator – not so the FDA or CDC.

“When Pfizer’s Six-Month Interim Report of Adverse Events (C4591001) revealed a total death count of 38 [35], the number seemed unexpectedly low for a clinical trial involving 44,060 participants amidst a pandemic. To investigate, Michels and colleagues estimated the anticipated deaths based on US mortality rates in 2020, presuming comparability across participating countries [54]. With 132 trial sites in the US and 80% of subjects, they estimated that 222 deaths should have occurred between July 27, 2020, and March 13, 2021, making the observed 38 deaths only 17% of the projected number.”

That study was age adjusted to reflect the demographics of the clinical trial participants so there is no age bias present.

One more extract from the paper:

“Thus, applying these reasonable, conservative assumptions, the estimated harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines greatly outweigh the rewards: for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections (for details, see Appendix 2). “

To repeat this was known in advance by all concerned and was intentionally ignored – hence there is pre-meditated intent to kill and harm.

The paper goes into detail on adverse events and shows numbers of deaths and adverse events based on conservative under reporting factors of around 20, rather than basing numbers on those in the Lazarus report of under reporting in excess of 100 for traditional vaccines – not for these gene modification products.

As a reminder, the re-issue of Pfizer’s post marketing authorization report revealed 1,223 deaths amongst 42,000 or so serious adverse events of special interest (special interest means harms anticipated – if it wasn’t anticipated it wasn’t reported).

 reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf (phmpt.org)

On page 6 the reissue includes a report of 126 million doses “shipped”. Only 70 million of these were administered. I have not seen ay representation of the under reporting factor for this post marketing authorisation study, My guess is that it is close to 100, because foreigners would not have had a clue about VAERS in the US or their requirement to report to Pfizer who then had the task of loading the report onto VAERS.

Recall that the FDA paid 30 million bucks, at least, to General Dynamics IT (and Eagle Tech/) to process the VAERS reports in the first months of the roll-out of injections.

If the under-reporting factor of the post marketing authorization report is 100, these 1,223 deaths become 122,300 deaths in the first 3 months of the roll0out of only Pfizer’s injections and the adverse events are 4.2 million not 42,000. The injection fatality rate is 122,300 out of 70 million doses = one death per 57,000 doses – a far cry from the usual safety standard of 1-2 deaths per million doses.

And here it is in the publication:

Cureus | COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign | Article

“Published: January 24, 2024 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52876  Peer-Reviewed

Cite this article as: Mead M, Seneff S, Wolfinger R, et al. (January 24, 2024) COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign. Cureus 16(1): e52876. doi:10.7759/cureus.52876”

One of the PhD commenters on the paper from Australia said they would pass it on to the Senate panel looking at possible terms of reference for a Royal Commission inquiry into the handling of C19.

And here is one website’s take on it:

For Every Life Saved, mRNA Vaccines Caused ‘Nearly 14 Times More Deaths’: Study | NTD

“The peer-reviewed study, published in the Cureus journal on Jan. 24, analyzed reports from the initial phase 3 trials of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. It was these trials that led to the shots being approved under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States. The study also looked into several other research and reviews of the trials. It found that the vaccines had “dramatically lower” efficacy rates than the vaccine companies claimed.

Moreover, based on “conservative assumptions, the estimated harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines greatly outweigh the rewards: for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections.”

Onwards!

Please subscribe or donate via Ko-fi – any amount from 3 bucks upwards. Don’t worry and God Bless, if you can’t or don’t want to. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 Ko-fi donation a week!