Peer reviewed paper revisiting the Phase 3 Clinical Trial studies for Pfizer and Moderna - reveals all the fraud that the FDA saw and ignored – send to regulators, legislative bodies and committees!
Peer reviewed paper revisiting the Phase 3 Clinical Trial studies for Pfizer and Moderna - reveals all the fraud that the FDA saw and ignored – send to regulators, legislative bodies and committees!
POST SCRIPT: Discussed in depth here: After three years, COVID-19 vaccination campaign declared a failure! (blubrry.com) Here is the paper: 20240125-8235-1308nlg.pdf (cureus.com) “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign”
Gotta wonder what the CDC is up to, as they have announced ADDing more shots to the childhood schedule, bringing the total to 90 before age 18. More SIDS death, destroyed lives, autism and broken marriages? Guess that's their goal.
The idea that a jab is needed implies that there is a virus out there floating around waiting to infect you, right? Is it not a fact that NOT EVEN ONE so-called "virus" has ever been isolated or purified using Koch's or even River's postulates, by ANY LAB anywhere in the world? You can go to CDC dot gov and search "symptoms of Covid-19". What pops up is an EXACT description of the common flu. Common flu was labelled a deadly virus and used as an excuse to lock down society, start a fear mongering campaign and most importantly of all to inject the people with a deadly "vaccine" as a way to reduce world population. The mRNA jab destroys the immune system, causing HIV, which is always fatal and takes years to kill. Tricky! According to the NYT 72% of the world's population is jabbed. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/world/covid-vaccinations-tracker.html
I read somewhere that 1 in 5 jabs were placebos. Don't remember where.
"How many people would have taken the injections if they had known that it would prevent just one C19 case per 100 cases in the population?" They haven't proved it saved anyone. And what's justification of using URF of 20?
finally found a brief, to the point interview Brian Hooker had with Geert Vanden Bossche, explaining the viral pressure exerted by injecting non-neutralizing antibodies. At the end are Geert's expectations for the future (when? he cannot predict). Here's a link from 26 Jan: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/mass-vaccination--viral-mutation/ - - although far simpler description, still not easy to grasp his entire view. In other words, Geert is saying this is not over, not by a long shot!
"Geert" needs to talk about the rest of the crap in the shots. "Viral pressure exerted by non-neutralizing antibodies" is the least of our problems and only makes sense to people who believe that SARS-CoV2 was properly isolated in the first place. We don't need GVB to predict the catastrophe that awaits us and waste time trying to understand his gibberish.
More than a few researchers are using electron microscopes and other scanning tools to determine what may be included. Its stunning how few ask how to get the synthetic toxins out, after they have been injected.
I'm no sleuth, investigative journalist, but even I knew all this about absolute v relative rate reduction difference of less than 1% more than two years ago! Canadian docs made layman vid about it! We have to stop believing most of these so called freedom docs plus majority of these substacker writers are just controlled ops, gatekeepers, or they don't know their arse from their elbow. Personally, I go option 1 as no virus ever recorded scientifically to have been isolated for real sequencing like bacteria so how can they prove "variants" ?? I am not just talking about SARS1 or 2 but HIV which Montagnier on vid says he didn't isolate or, Lanke, who proved same cell situation with or without alleged virus due to what they add to cell for finding purified measles virus. There is a reward out of over 1m euro to any scientist to show scientific proof and no surprise, still unclaimed. Our govs, judiciary work not for us but who controls them. Why don't all these docs and scientists organise a take over of a maintstream TV channel to get the truth out to stop jabs instead of grifting their own supplementary aids? Am I expecting too much after 4 years?
I have been ranting about the aborted clinical trials and the post marketing authorization report that ran for 10 weeks to end February 2021 with results published in April 2021 since I started out on SubStack in August 2022 - i think there has been an explosion (and monetization) of "la resiatance" - like Rumble, Epoch Times, OAN, America Out Loud and many others aggregators like Citizen Free Press/Whatfinger CensoredNews and SubStack that offers an alternative that most are aware of and support.
Yes there are bad actors in "la resistance" - there is a difference between jumping on the band wagon and replacing lost income - but, on the whole, it is relatively easy to spot those that actually want to help, those whose articles are worth money and those that are less "punchy" or even regurgitaors. I fall into that latter camp most of the time - some opinion pieces and research, but mostly checking the news headlines from emails/notifications and checking them out.
SubStack won't pay my rent but it keeps me in coffee and beans!
Hi Peter - off subject but Lioness of Judah article you cross-posted earlier today is weird. The video embedded in the article refers to Australian gov't "DIR 184" about genetically modified human adenovirus COVID-19 vaccine nasal spray which was trialled mid 2021 and apparently approved, not about chemtrailing it onto population (as far as I can see). I thought I'd check out comments but they're no longer accessible and you can't even like.
Gotta wonder what the CDC is up to, as they have announced ADDing more shots to the childhood schedule, bringing the total to 90 before age 18. More SIDS death, destroyed lives, autism and broken marriages? Guess that's their goal.
The idea that a jab is needed implies that there is a virus out there floating around waiting to infect you, right? Is it not a fact that NOT EVEN ONE so-called "virus" has ever been isolated or purified using Koch's or even River's postulates, by ANY LAB anywhere in the world? You can go to CDC dot gov and search "symptoms of Covid-19". What pops up is an EXACT description of the common flu. Common flu was labelled a deadly virus and used as an excuse to lock down society, start a fear mongering campaign and most importantly of all to inject the people with a deadly "vaccine" as a way to reduce world population. The mRNA jab destroys the immune system, causing HIV, which is always fatal and takes years to kill. Tricky! According to the NYT 72% of the world's population is jabbed. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/world/covid-vaccinations-tracker.html
I read somewhere that 1 in 5 jabs were placebos. Don't remember where.
"How many people would have taken the injections if they had known that it would prevent just one C19 case per 100 cases in the population?" They haven't proved it saved anyone. And what's justification of using URF of 20?
finally found a brief, to the point interview Brian Hooker had with Geert Vanden Bossche, explaining the viral pressure exerted by injecting non-neutralizing antibodies. At the end are Geert's expectations for the future (when? he cannot predict). Here's a link from 26 Jan: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/mass-vaccination--viral-mutation/ - - although far simpler description, still not easy to grasp his entire view. In other words, Geert is saying this is not over, not by a long shot!
"Geert" needs to talk about the rest of the crap in the shots. "Viral pressure exerted by non-neutralizing antibodies" is the least of our problems and only makes sense to people who believe that SARS-CoV2 was properly isolated in the first place. We don't need GVB to predict the catastrophe that awaits us and waste time trying to understand his gibberish.
More than a few researchers are using electron microscopes and other scanning tools to determine what may be included. Its stunning how few ask how to get the synthetic toxins out, after they have been injected.
We are all contaminated apparently, injected or not.
I'm no sleuth, investigative journalist, but even I knew all this about absolute v relative rate reduction difference of less than 1% more than two years ago! Canadian docs made layman vid about it! We have to stop believing most of these so called freedom docs plus majority of these substacker writers are just controlled ops, gatekeepers, or they don't know their arse from their elbow. Personally, I go option 1 as no virus ever recorded scientifically to have been isolated for real sequencing like bacteria so how can they prove "variants" ?? I am not just talking about SARS1 or 2 but HIV which Montagnier on vid says he didn't isolate or, Lanke, who proved same cell situation with or without alleged virus due to what they add to cell for finding purified measles virus. There is a reward out of over 1m euro to any scientist to show scientific proof and no surprise, still unclaimed. Our govs, judiciary work not for us but who controls them. Why don't all these docs and scientists organise a take over of a maintstream TV channel to get the truth out to stop jabs instead of grifting their own supplementary aids? Am I expecting too much after 4 years?
I hear you.
I have been ranting about the aborted clinical trials and the post marketing authorization report that ran for 10 weeks to end February 2021 with results published in April 2021 since I started out on SubStack in August 2022 - i think there has been an explosion (and monetization) of "la resiatance" - like Rumble, Epoch Times, OAN, America Out Loud and many others aggregators like Citizen Free Press/Whatfinger CensoredNews and SubStack that offers an alternative that most are aware of and support.
Yes there are bad actors in "la resistance" - there is a difference between jumping on the band wagon and replacing lost income - but, on the whole, it is relatively easy to spot those that actually want to help, those whose articles are worth money and those that are less "punchy" or even regurgitaors. I fall into that latter camp most of the time - some opinion pieces and research, but mostly checking the news headlines from emails/notifications and checking them out.
SubStack won't pay my rent but it keeps me in coffee and beans!
Hi Peter - off subject but Lioness of Judah article you cross-posted earlier today is weird. The video embedded in the article refers to Australian gov't "DIR 184" about genetically modified human adenovirus COVID-19 vaccine nasal spray which was trialled mid 2021 and apparently approved, not about chemtrailing it onto population (as far as I can see). I thought I'd check out comments but they're no longer accessible and you can't even like.
Rebel News is also a good media outlet!
"the number seemed unexpectedly low for a clinical trial"
Yeah, they knew this, and gave the shots anyway, because there was no expectation of preventing illness, only causing it.
Good thing Mr. Aldred is sharing this video ⚠️ https://youtu.be/y7dMTA-fD5Q?si=EjxiEbmX7ffxuHHE ⚠️ https://open.substack.com/pub/mathewaldred/p/was-this-the-first-paper-to-show?r=ykqw5&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
I have an awful feeling that most governments will continue to push boosters.
Is there any way to stop this madness?
https://i.imgur.com/FRg0fBg.jpg