Pfizer/BioNTech injections were changed in October 2021 from “toxic and inappropriate as mRNA injections” (purple cap) to “corrected but still toxic and inappropriate" (grey cap)
Pfizer/BioNTech injections were changed in October 2021 from “toxic and inappropriate as mRNA injections” (purple cap) to “corrected but still toxic and inappropriate" (grey cap)
Check out this brilliant analysis and exposure of wilful malfeasance by the European health regulator – the European Medical Agency (EMA) – I would not be at all surprised to find that it is banned shortly and the good Professor censored and even imprisoned.
Thanks Peter for getting the message out. You are unbelievably fast. You deserve many coffees for this! I will be sending it on to Oz Senator Gerard Rennick (with date correction mentioned by commenter below). Fyi and for those interested, I just posted this comment on your previous article:
Yes, the 2019 patent provides indisputable proof that Pfizer was aware of the dangers well before roll-out. Prof. Segalla is appointed expert in upcoming Italian lawsuit on this. I'm not sure whether it's against Pfizer or Italian government. The EMA is also deeply implicated, as are the other regulatory bodies. Reiner Fuellmich did an interview with Prof. Segalla about a month ago, where he mentioned this. It's also an extremely interesting interview with a different slide presentation which is just as good as the vimeo vid - https://video.icic.law/w/tVs62DuxtQpnh5ixbzbF9c Also on rumble - https://rumble.com/v2xcdzk-dr.-gabriela-segalla-w-reiner-fuellmich-presents-evidence-proving-premedita.html This article summarizes the interview https://uriweiss.substack.com/p/an-extraordinary-discussion-between I am trying to remember how I came across Prof. Segalla for the first time. I think he made a presentation to the EU parliamentarian dissident group several months back. Apparently CHD is also onto it. I'm trying to find the transcript of vimeo presentation. It should exist somewhere given English subtitles. I searched YT but not there afaics. Pity as you can auto-generate a transcript on YT. This is an absolute bombshell. I'm about to send a message to Oz Sen. Gerard Rennick on this as he has specifically asked Pfizer reps. about their knowledge on mechanisms of harm, esp. re. cardiac issues, myocarditis specifically. They played dumb of course and took his question on notice. Sen. Rennick was not re-selected by Liberal Party to stand at next 1/2 elections so he's just the man to reveal the bomshell as he has nothing to lose. Glad you're onto this Peter. I have signalled it to a number of substackers hoping someone would dig into it. Uri's article was OK but not many saw it.
I am reaching the conclusion that the number of 'bomb shells' (and their proxies of chaos, sickness and death) is inversely proportional to the degree of interest of the wider populace, who in all jurisdictions are now determinedly blind to the mounting escalation of assaults.
Another point for suspicion, how could they have a patent for a COVID jab already in November of 2019, when the pandemic just started in December 2019?
it was a patent for LNP not the jab that is discussed above but yes the actual gene therapy patent was ready in September 2019 according to dr David Martin.
Hopefully all the experts have a forum to discuss each contribution and move forward to an overwhelming case that it will be impossible for regulators, medics and politicians to ignore.
I suspect regulators are scared s*hitless this will happen and politicians cannot get their heads round this combined work.
Fuellmich tried and seems to have faded into pursuing avenues leading to Maori law!
I think the expert opinion has somehow to be related to individuals in a class action to sue for reparations - unfortunately the victims will be taxed to pay for their harms. Well unless specific clawback laws are passed - much like the windfall taxes on oil companies.
VAERS experts, plus legal experts, plus patent experts, plus treatment experts, plus a group of professors representing victims? Sort of a travelling circus - though that is not the best descriptor!
Bombshell video, ty for bringing this to our attention. All our "conspiracy theories" are not only coming true, they are even topped. How could an experimental substance like this ever been not only approved , but even mandated for human treatment? So unreal.
Latypova says and shows DoD manufacturing contracts to supply "prototypes" not vaccines per se and so could use the LNPs. Isn't there a legal case with Moderna sueing Pfizer over them using Moderna technology on LNPs? Prototypes on Pfizer contracts, or are they BioNtech? Comirnaty never used in USA, so I believe. Was that the one which received full approval, not EUA, in Europe?
"A lawsuit filed Monday by Arbutus Biopharma Corp against Moderna Inc is the latest in a small but growing list of high-stakes patent disputes over COVID-19 vaccines and treatments.
Arbutus and its partner Genevant Sciences GmbH told a Delaware federal court that Moderna misused its technology for delivering mRNA, which it said allowed Moderna to develop its COVID-19 vaccine at "record speed."
"The settlement stipulates that the four non-exclusive viral vaccine sublicenses previously granted to Moderna are the only sublicenses to survive. These four sublicenses, previously granted by Acuitas to Moderna under the pre-April 15, 2010 Arbutus LNP patent families, are each limited to a specific viral target. Moderna has no other rights to Arbutus' broad suite of LNP intellectual property."
"Moderna said it is suing Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech for patent infringement linked to the development of the first Covid-19 vaccines.
The US biotech company is alleging that mRNA technology it developed before the pandemic was copied. The lawsuit, which is seeking unspecified financial damages, was filed in the US and Germany.
Pfizer said it was "surprised" by the action and would "vigorously defend" itself against the allegations. In a statement, Moderna said Pfizer/BioNTech copied two key elements of its intellectual property."
Thanks Peter for getting the message out. You are unbelievably fast. You deserve many coffees for this! I will be sending it on to Oz Senator Gerard Rennick (with date correction mentioned by commenter below). Fyi and for those interested, I just posted this comment on your previous article:
Yes, the 2019 patent provides indisputable proof that Pfizer was aware of the dangers well before roll-out. Prof. Segalla is appointed expert in upcoming Italian lawsuit on this. I'm not sure whether it's against Pfizer or Italian government. The EMA is also deeply implicated, as are the other regulatory bodies. Reiner Fuellmich did an interview with Prof. Segalla about a month ago, where he mentioned this. It's also an extremely interesting interview with a different slide presentation which is just as good as the vimeo vid - https://video.icic.law/w/tVs62DuxtQpnh5ixbzbF9c Also on rumble - https://rumble.com/v2xcdzk-dr.-gabriela-segalla-w-reiner-fuellmich-presents-evidence-proving-premedita.html This article summarizes the interview https://uriweiss.substack.com/p/an-extraordinary-discussion-between I am trying to remember how I came across Prof. Segalla for the first time. I think he made a presentation to the EU parliamentarian dissident group several months back. Apparently CHD is also onto it. I'm trying to find the transcript of vimeo presentation. It should exist somewhere given English subtitles. I searched YT but not there afaics. Pity as you can auto-generate a transcript on YT. This is an absolute bombshell. I'm about to send a message to Oz Sen. Gerard Rennick on this as he has specifically asked Pfizer reps. about their knowledge on mechanisms of harm, esp. re. cardiac issues, myocarditis specifically. They played dumb of course and took his question on notice. Sen. Rennick was not re-selected by Liberal Party to stand at next 1/2 elections so he's just the man to reveal the bomshell as he has nothing to lose. Glad you're onto this Peter. I have signalled it to a number of substackers hoping someone would dig into it. Uri's article was OK but not many saw it.
I am reaching the conclusion that the number of 'bomb shells' (and their proxies of chaos, sickness and death) is inversely proportional to the degree of interest of the wider populace, who in all jurisdictions are now determinedly blind to the mounting escalation of assaults.
Another point for suspicion, how could they have a patent for a COVID jab already in November of 2019, when the pandemic just started in December 2019?
it was a patent for LNP not the jab that is discussed above but yes the actual gene therapy patent was ready in September 2019 according to dr David Martin.
Very interesting, ty
Hopefully all the experts have a forum to discuss each contribution and move forward to an overwhelming case that it will be impossible for regulators, medics and politicians to ignore.
I suspect regulators are scared s*hitless this will happen and politicians cannot get their heads round this combined work.
Fuellmich tried and seems to have faded into pursuing avenues leading to Maori law!
I think the expert opinion has somehow to be related to individuals in a class action to sue for reparations - unfortunately the victims will be taxed to pay for their harms. Well unless specific clawback laws are passed - much like the windfall taxes on oil companies.
VAERS experts, plus legal experts, plus patent experts, plus treatment experts, plus a group of professors representing victims? Sort of a travelling circus - though that is not the best descriptor!
Strange Fuellmich is pursuing Maori law/lore angle. Can't see that going very far.
Bombshell video, ty for bringing this to our attention. All our "conspiracy theories" are not only coming true, they are even topped. How could an experimental substance like this ever been not only approved , but even mandated for human treatment? So unreal.
Staggering video. How was this allowed to happen?
Operation warp speed. BARDA in charge with no competence.
Latypova says and shows DoD manufacturing contracts to supply "prototypes" not vaccines per se and so could use the LNPs. Isn't there a legal case with Moderna sueing Pfizer over them using Moderna technology on LNPs? Prototypes on Pfizer contracts, or are they BioNtech? Comirnaty never used in USA, so I believe. Was that the one which received full approval, not EUA, in Europe?
there's a few around
February 28, 2022
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/covid-19-patent-challenges-mount-moderna-faces-new-vaccine-lawsuit-2022-02-28/
"A lawsuit filed Monday by Arbutus Biopharma Corp against Moderna Inc is the latest in a small but growing list of high-stakes patent disputes over COVID-19 vaccines and treatments.
Arbutus and its partner Genevant Sciences GmbH told a Delaware federal court that Moderna misused its technology for delivering mRNA, which it said allowed Moderna to develop its COVID-19 vaccine at "record speed."
Mar 24, 2022
https://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/news/2022/03/24/arbutus-biopharma-covid-vaccine-pfizer-acuitas.html
"The lawsuit is a preemptive strike in a widening dispute over patents involving the makers of Covid-19 vaccines."
One of these (can't remember which is tied to a Canadian university and turdeau -
even after a prior settlement in 2018 https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Arbutus+Biopharma+settles+litigation+with+Acuitas+Therapeutics.-a0528545972
"The settlement stipulates that the four non-exclusive viral vaccine sublicenses previously granted to Moderna are the only sublicenses to survive. These four sublicenses, previously granted by Acuitas to Moderna under the pre-April 15, 2010 Arbutus LNP patent families, are each limited to a specific viral target. Moderna has no other rights to Arbutus' broad suite of LNP intellectual property."
26 August 2022
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62691102
"Moderna said it is suing Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech for patent infringement linked to the development of the first Covid-19 vaccines.
The US biotech company is alleging that mRNA technology it developed before the pandemic was copied. The lawsuit, which is seeking unspecified financial damages, was filed in the US and Germany.
Pfizer said it was "surprised" by the action and would "vigorously defend" itself against the allegations. In a statement, Moderna said Pfizer/BioNTech copied two key elements of its intellectual property."
October 2019??
The Pfizer/Moderna injections for covid - really? 2019?
Chit! October 2021 - too much haste not enough speed!
thanks for the cartch.
Good, glad it wasn't me being dumb ;)
Many people are a lot smarter than I am! haha,
Not true!