Playing with numbers. It would take a fall of 85% in births PLUS an excess mortality rate of 400% to get to a 30% reduction in world population in ten years
Playing with numbers. It would take a fall of 85% in births PLUS an excess mortality rate of 400% to get to a 30% reduction in world population in ten years
After reading Igor Chudov’s latest post on his excellent SubStack, it got me thinking. What would be the components of a population reduction conspiracy?Peter’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Playing with numbers. It would take a fall of 85% in births PLUS an excess mortality rate of 400% to get to a 30% reduction in world population in ten years
Interesting number games. India, China and Japan have already been mentioned by others. The Philippines, where I currently am, apparently dipped below replacement level for the first time ever after the jab roll-out. So with Asia not really up to speed anymore, we'll have to rely on our African and Middle Eastern friends (as well as hardcore Catholics and Mormons) to keep the ball rolling :)
Sorry by the way, can't afford to buy you a coffee at this moment in time, my friend.
Worry about something else. The rate of global population growth is declining, and the world's human population will top out later this century. The very profound problems that this will bring are already starting. Worry about that.
IF there was a depopulation conspiracy by eco-terrorists, they most likely would focus their earth saving efforts on cultures with the highest consumption and pollution rates per capita. Leaving emerging nations out of your analysis would change the results considerably. The western cultures would die off much quicker than you estimated
Possible math error? "Annual births around 134 million. Annual deaths around 67 million. A fall in the birth rate of 15% would equate to 13.4 million fewer births and a 15% increase in deaths would equate to 6.7 million more deaths."
It looks like those results were obtained using multiplication by 10%, not 15%.
This is why I support unlimited abortion. The VAST majority of seekers are Democrat women. The sooner they opt out of the gene pool, the better for the rest of us. The rest? Well, that's between them and God, if they are believers.
Perhaps it’s the next generation where we will see the most damage. Those born to mrna vaccinated mothers. Or the next generation after that. Sure will be interesting
A four-part series. A retired educationalist tours the evidence of how Britain has distinguished itself since 2020 in the treatment of its youngest. Is anyone accountable for the harm inflicted on children?
Dec 22, 2022·edited Dec 22, 2022Liked by Peter Halligan
I understand that given the ageing population of much of the Western World and its current “less than replacement” birthrates it’s not hard to see a decrease in world population. Japan is in rapid decline as India falls below replacement. Also China after its disastrous one child policy, despite a reversal, is predicting a fall from 1.3B to say 750M by 2075.
This was without the devastating impact on fertility from Covid and other jabs. A Malthusian dream but one that will cripple nations looking for a workforce and a market to support growth.
Dec 22, 2022·edited Dec 22, 2022Liked by Peter Halligan
You forget lots of ways to get to the death numbers. A leaky vaccine created a disease so bad that the entire chicken industry must vaccinate all of its chickens at birth. It worked great at first. In the end the vaccinated create super strains to kill the unvaccinated.
“The issue is with non-sterilizing vaccines” These are vaccines that do not stop transmission but prevent death.
“The Marek’s disease vaccine is a very good anti-disease vaccine, but in terms of the virus, it’s a leaky vaccine; it lets the virus get through to the host.”
“Marek’s disease vaccination allowed super hot strains to spread in ways that would not be possible otherwise.”
Playing with numbers. It would take a fall of 85% in births PLUS an excess mortality rate of 400% to get to a 30% reduction in world population in ten years
So are you for killing off people with the jabs and making them sterile?
I can see Billium Gates greedily rubbing his hands in glee as he reads this report. Depop plan is on track!
Interesting number games. India, China and Japan have already been mentioned by others. The Philippines, where I currently am, apparently dipped below replacement level for the first time ever after the jab roll-out. So with Asia not really up to speed anymore, we'll have to rely on our African and Middle Eastern friends (as well as hardcore Catholics and Mormons) to keep the ball rolling :)
Sorry by the way, can't afford to buy you a coffee at this moment in time, my friend.
Worry about something else. The rate of global population growth is declining, and the world's human population will top out later this century. The very profound problems that this will bring are already starting. Worry about that.
IF there was a depopulation conspiracy by eco-terrorists, they most likely would focus their earth saving efforts on cultures with the highest consumption and pollution rates per capita. Leaving emerging nations out of your analysis would change the results considerably. The western cultures would die off much quicker than you estimated
Possible math error? "Annual births around 134 million. Annual deaths around 67 million. A fall in the birth rate of 15% would equate to 13.4 million fewer births and a 15% increase in deaths would equate to 6.7 million more deaths."
It looks like those results were obtained using multiplication by 10%, not 15%.
Carry on...
Please... PLEASE... stop voting democrat!
Never ever vote for one!
This is why I support unlimited abortion. The VAST majority of seekers are Democrat women. The sooner they opt out of the gene pool, the better for the rest of us. The rest? Well, that's between them and God, if they are believers.
If liberals want to sterilize themselves then GO FOR IT. Less stupid mean people producing little stupid mean people...
Perhaps it’s the next generation where we will see the most damage. Those born to mrna vaccinated mothers. Or the next generation after that. Sure will be interesting
More frightening than anything else is simply going out in public and observing the zombies, who remain entirely unaware.
Hugh McCarthy
20 min ago
1
A four-part series. A retired educationalist tours the evidence of how Britain has distinguished itself since 2020 in the treatment of its youngest. Is anyone accountable for the harm inflicted on children?
Read the article here
I understand that given the ageing population of much of the Western World and its current “less than replacement” birthrates it’s not hard to see a decrease in world population. Japan is in rapid decline as India falls below replacement. Also China after its disastrous one child policy, despite a reversal, is predicting a fall from 1.3B to say 750M by 2075.
This was without the devastating impact on fertility from Covid and other jabs. A Malthusian dream but one that will cripple nations looking for a workforce and a market to support growth.
That would be - is becoming - a Black-Death-like event, at least in the West, yes?
You forget lots of ways to get to the death numbers. A leaky vaccine created a disease so bad that the entire chicken industry must vaccinate all of its chickens at birth. It worked great at first. In the end the vaccinated create super strains to kill the unvaccinated.
“The issue is with non-sterilizing vaccines” These are vaccines that do not stop transmission but prevent death.
“The Marek’s disease vaccine is a very good anti-disease vaccine, but in terms of the virus, it’s a leaky vaccine; it lets the virus get through to the host.”
“Marek’s disease vaccination allowed super hot strains to spread in ways that would not be possible otherwise.”
https://asm.org/Podcasts/MTM/Episodes/095-The-Evolution-of-Virulence-with-Andrew-Read