14 Comments
User's avatar
Honeybee's avatar

Thank you for this. I'm so burned out on DNA/Covid research/material that I gloss over most articles these days. This researcher's remarks are extremely important. I think the DNA pieces constitute a programming sequence leading to human extinction. The replacement is to come from ideas expressed by people like Harari. They will implant human consciousness within a hybrid-cyber "human" body thereby gaining their must desired "immortality." Before that attainment, they must reduce Earth's population at least 50-75%. There is an anti-human evocation evinced through both reducing the population and redesigning what constitutes life. Of course, as we all know, their destruction lies within their approach. Material scientism without human spirituality (genesis) ultimately becomes neutralized and sterile.

Expand full comment
Peter Halligan's avatar

"Neutralized and sterile" is a good description of those belonging to what I call "the Cult of Moloch" - for want of a better term.

Their wish to escape their world of excited misery manifests in their plans for everyone else that they don't apply to themselves.

"Groomers go first" springs to mind for the eugenicists!

Expand full comment
Lee Muller's avatar

There's a difference between altered DNA (mutation) and creating a different species. If vaxxed and unvaxxed can reproduce and their offspring is healthy and can reproduce, which I believe is likely, we remain the same species. The vax may be creating a genetic defect for certain or causing some to be infertile, but to the extent a whole new species is getting created seems very unlikely. Would be nice if someone more trained on the topic than me would pipe up.

Expand full comment
Lee Muller's avatar

I think I am being too light in my comment. To alter DNA, especially without knowledge or permission is wrong. If we label food as genetically modified or bioengineered, then we should also label any product that would cause a person to be. Studies indicate there's a good chance that the vax reaches reproductive organs, and the question Peter raises of how this could/is passed on is legit. The covid vax is just one such product, there are many other products that fall in this category. It is an important topic. I don't want to sound dismissive at all. We shouldn't just wait around to find out what can or cannot reproduce, but rather stop mixing/altering DNA without people's knowledge or consent. If we label products as carcinogens, certainly we should label products as gene/DNA altering or modification. We should also label applicable shots/products as containing a bioengineered product as well, just like many/most manufactured tortilla chips it seems these days. We should know if our medical treatments involve anything genetically modified, in addition to our food. Yes, I understand this could involve thousands of products, but it is the transparency that's needed.

Expand full comment
Lawrence Butts's avatar

Right... so a new human sub-species can't be created? I disagree... If the vaccinated have altered DNA that is different from the unvaccinated... we have a new human subspecies. We have to hope that the genetically altered are infertile. Because the results (or mutations) that could arise one or two or even three generation in the future could be horrifying. Just being around the vaccinated tells me that they are now "different" from us. They are dumber more emotionally driven and in some ways just plain scary. I don't think we will be able to live with the ones who do survive the injections. Their brains are being attacked by their immune system attacks on the spike proteins that have passed through the blood brain barrier. Everyone has seen the personality changes of people they know. They are different. They are no longer like us...

Expand full comment
Brent Rice's avatar

We have no idea at this stage what the ong term effects of the mRNA vaccines will be. But 1 in 35 children are now autistic due to childhood vaccines. Imagine what would happen if all the autistic people were rounded up & put on a isolated pacific island to fend for themselves. Would any exist in 100-200 years, as pacific Islanders did for thousands of years?

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

See my comment above for background on my husband - who also has studied genetics a lot:

"Most biologists have a hard time deciding exactly what qualifies as a new species. If you follow the law of reproduction you have to have 2 individuals of the new species to breed. 1 or 2 people do not a species make. All that would be is a messed up genome." My husband also said you are exactly right!

Expand full comment
Lee Muller's avatar

Just for clarification are you agreeing with my comment? Just checking. I am female so I wasn't sure if you're referring to someone else. I know my name is more common for males, so that could explain it.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Hi Lee: Sorry, yes I thought you were male - and yes, I was responding to you. You said it would be nice if someone more trained on the topic could weigh in. Since my husband was sitting right next to me at the time, I asked him for his opinion. He was impressed with your comment and for figuring it out so well. btw, I'm often mistaken for being a man, as I only give my first initial in my screen name but I'm definitely a woman. LOL.

Expand full comment
Lee Muller's avatar

Thank you for clarifying :-)

Expand full comment
Peter Halligan's avatar

Always value the input of experts! Especially the ones who are uncompromised!

Expand full comment
Lee Muller's avatar

Appended my comment above. Thank you for your work.

Expand full comment
E. Grogan's avatar

Agreed!

Expand full comment