Rising global cancer rates – post C19 mRNA and viral vector injections (smoking is not to blame)
Rising cancer rates – smoking is not to blame
Conflict of interest: I am a third generation smoker and have been smoking for 50 years. My parents and grand parents all lived to over 80 years old. I am not advocating smoking, merely pointing out two things.
1. Smokers are social outcasts and are heavily taxed over decades to cover marginal increases in costs at end of life
2. Cancer rates are on the rise whilst smoking rates have halved over the last 30 years or so
3. The health risks from smoking are dwarfed by the health risks from C19 injections and yet C19 injections carry no health warnings – smoking health warnings that cover strident messages that smoking kills, causes organ damage and causes impotence, amongst many other things with graphic images of such damage
I read the article in expose-news.com
Referencing this piece by Dr Guy Hatchard here:
Cancers Rise Dramatically in Tandem With Covid Vaccinations - Hatchard Report
Which, in turn, reference this data from the UK:
UK - PIP Analysis - Body Systems (phinancetechnologies.com)
Which had this statemen extracted from another source:
“Dietary risk factors (diet high in red meat, low in fruits, high in sodium and low in milk, etc.), alcohol consumption and tobacco use are the main risk factors underlying early-onset cancers.”
So here’s a couple of links to some UK information about UK smoking habits.
Health Survey for England: Smoking (hscic.gov.uk)
That last link covers the period to 2019.
“The proportion of adults who smoke has fallen, from 27% in 1993 to 16% in 2019. And smoking habits among those who smoke are changing, too, with the average (median) number of cigarettes smoked per day falling from 15 to 10. There has also been a clear decline in the proportion of children who have ever smoked, with a decrease of 15 percentage points since 1997.”
A fall from 27% to 16% between 1993 and 2019.
From here: Adult smoking habits in the UK - Office for National Statistics (ons.gov.uk)
“In the UK population in 2022, 12.9% of people aged 18 years and over, or around 6.4 million people, smoked cigarettes; this is the lowest proportion of current smokers since records began in 2011 based on our estimates from the Annual Population Survey (APS).”
Leave aside the statement “since records began in 2011, when the last link had records from 1993, the point is that the number of smokers dropped a further 3% from the 16% in 2019 to 13%in 2022.
This means that in the last 30 years, the numbers of smokers has more than halved.
On an absolute basis, 1993 UK population = 57.6, 27% of that is 15.55 million, 13% of 68 million = 8.84 million, so an absolute decline of 6.71 million over 30 years or 43$.
Now compare that to the comment in the expose-news.com article authored by Dr Guy Hatchard.
“A study published in BMJ Oncology this month entitled “Global trends in incidence, death, burden and risk factors of early-onset cancer from 1990 to 2019” has reported a 79.1% rise in cancer incidence among people under 50 years of age during the last thirty years. This averages to a 2.6% annual rise. Over 350 news outlets around the world have published articles reporting the results.”
My point is that NOT couching the rise in cancer rates when rates of smoking have halved over the 30 years to 2019 runs the risk of NOT sufficiently looking for the significance of OTHER likely causes of cancer - such as GMO foods, cancer treatments like chemo, or food additives, or cell-phone, laptop or flat screen radiation or microwave usage, or increased diesel exhaust from autos – to cite possible causes.
Back to the “Hatchard” piece.
“You might have noticed that the study covers data up to the end of 2019, and you are perhaps wondering what is happening now. If you have been reading our reports, you probably know that up-to-date data on specific disease categories is hard to come by and might just be subject to some form of suppression. You have to dig around to get a hold of the current situation.”
Ok, we know that the pushback to the “vaxx damage” argument is always – “the same percentage has been infected as injected, prove the sickness you call vaxx damage is not C19 damage” – we can now do that since C19 damage only has the S1 portion of the spike protein whereas the vaxx damage has S1 and S2 portions.
See here:
Here’s the main point of Dr Hatchard’s piece:
“Just imagine if these figures are being replicated around the world. That would amount to an additional 1 million cancer cases, being quietly swept under the rug. One million people are unaware of a possible deadly cause of their disease – covid vaccination – being administered by the same health professionals who say they are dedicated to preserving public health.”
I suggest that an extra 1 million out of 5.5 billion injected people is a low-ball (testicular) estimate. It will be much higher, maybe 50 times higher, since diagnostics have fallen down during and since the pandemic and the reference sample is those in work, and does not reflect labour force participation, the retired or “non-adults”.
“The figures are even more concerning if you consider the increase in the total number of people applying for disability payments in the UK because they are unable to work due to various conditions – 372,000. If this is being repeated worldwide, in 2022 there will have been 31 million new cases of disability. A figure that is similarly being swept under the rug by medical authorities and governments.”
“As long as complete public health data broken down by vaccination status, age and condition are being kept well-hidden and withheld from independent researchers no one will know what exactly is going on. Overseas data is now catching up with us. New Zealand can’t keep its head in the sand any longer. This needs to be a topic in election debates and at public meetings.”
Damned straight.
The true colours of politicians have been revealed. We need leaders who will root out the corruption that has killed and maimed people in the alphabet soup of health and other government agencies, the MSM, social media platforms, the police and justice systems – all of it.
This means that there needs to be wholesale sacking of ALL politicians in all countries that participated in the genocide and apocalyptic harms. Big pharma is of course, the weapon provider that operated in the full knowledge that the weapons they produced would blow up in people’s faces (vital organs) – this was pre-meditated and done with intent 0 there can be no excuses or immunity from liability,
But let’s improve the quality of the analysis and not trot out old mantras like “smoking causes cancer” when its significance as a proportion of cancers has halved, leaving an awful lot of naked people in the sea with cancers from dominant sources as the tide has gone out. The significance of cancers from C19 mRNA and viral vector injections is a rapidly developing health emergency.
More treatments are needed, maybe fenbendazole or ivermectin will help. Leaving it in the hands of the failed health systems additionally suffering from staff sicknesses, corruption and useless bureaucracy – is a recipe for more mass deaths,
Maybe even correcting vitamin or mineral deficiencies would be useful or just eating the skins and pulp of more fruit, though watch out for Bill Gates latest foray into additives that make the fruit look healthy for weeks rather than days (maybe his mosquitoes like that modified fruit). Hell, maybe even CRISPR gene editing or nanobots can be used as a method to destroy cancer cells, or a cain of function virus can be developed that annihilates cancer cells and simply disappears once it has “eaten” them. Our best and brightest can search for the light amongst the darkness as long as politics is removed from medicine (and patents!).
CAS 43210-67-9 Fenbendazole - BOC Sciences
Onwards!
Please buy a subscription or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 coffee a week!
As a PhD clinician with post-grad occupational health training, the fallacy of "smoking" in which every disease known, unknown and imaginary was amplified and laid at the medical voodoo altar of tobacco became an inescapably obvious distortion of reality that interfered with understanding, hazard, risk mitigation and prevention in occupational medicine.
Not only that, as a deeply misguided philosophy of control, it served to demonize, ostracize and demean millions in quite a mindless and mistaken manner. Exactly the same tactics once used on smokers are being used now in the many theaters of government control, most particularly against those who wisely rejected unethical experimental shots, virtue signalling masks and lock-down compliance. Look no further than the devotion of New Zealand to the idiotic abolition of tobacco.
Recommended reading: "Dissecting Smokers Brains" Michael J McFadden (2003) Aethna Press, DOVER DE19904. ISBN 0-9744979-0-8
I don't need to add the footnote that for those devoted to the COVID-19 narrative, smokers did better than never-smokers. Non-smokers even fared less well.
I had to laugh about the smoking hype. I grew up around smokers. Smoked myself , and married a smoker. When we all got together there were 12 smokers in one room.. including our poor little children, who were breathing, the secondhand smoke, lol most of the them grew up to smoke. And none of us have ever had cancer! I was born in early 50s. If smoking was so terrible than all of us should on respirators , and or oxygen, and maybe in wheelchairs. What a hoax. I do use nicotine lozenges. I gave up smoking in 2002. I will continue to use my lozenges. My daughter uses nicotine gum, and did the Iron Man , is a triathlete , cycles and runs every weekend.. none of us have taken the shot and none of us ever will. Great article !!!