Thank you Peter, great post! As a smoker myself I actually have been wondering how does it all stuck up, with the numbers of smokers falling so significantly and all. Funny how the cigarette packs carry the warnings and listing of the nasties and yet (with prohibitive price) we are still able to exercise our choice. Still not as big a money maker as vaxx. Saying that, I rather believe that the whole wonderful gift to humanity (as so many govs interventions) has been from the very beginning about something else, wasn't perhaps conceived as a money spinner.
The injections started off costing 20 bucks a pop and now are 120 bucks - heavily censored by the bought and paid for media. The costs of treating the side effects are hundreds of times more, but those suffering are not (yet) as many as those injected..
compared to the 4,000 bucks a year in taxes (well in NY and IL etc anyway, not in Ca or MI !) to die 15 years sooner - but with, maybe, more breathing assistance in the last few months of life - and taken care of in a hospice or hospital,
Seems to me that the long term side effects of vaxx injury run to tens of thousands of bucks a year for many years.
Not much analysis of recent estimates of 7& per shot loss in remaining years of life expectancy for the injections - compared to, what 15 years out of 90 years for smokers?
You would have hoped that this sort of analysis on life years lost and quality life years lost would be being done by someone now - but, given there is not even any work being done on increasing rates of autism, Alzheimer's, heart disease and non-smoking cancer, diabetes etc - it seems that paying attention to what is killing peoplle is ot a priority of ANY health organisation at national, state or city level
This experimental stuff from hell should be pulled off the market, but instead they are covering up all the horrible side effects and are pushing the next round of boosters. This is criminal!
Yes, Dr Vaughn is doing the rounds. i wonder what he thinks about ia contention that the S1 part of the spike protein exists in the infection ONLY - whereas the vaxx damage has both the S1 and S2 stem of the spike protein.
Sep 12, 2023·edited Sep 12, 2023Liked by Peter Halligan
As a PhD clinician with post-grad occupational health training, the fallacy of "smoking" in which every disease known, unknown and imaginary was amplified and laid at the medical voodoo altar of tobacco became an inescapably obvious distortion of reality that interfered with understanding, hazard, risk mitigation and prevention in occupational medicine.
Not only that, as a deeply misguided philosophy of control, it served to demonize, ostracize and demean millions in quite a mindless and mistaken manner. Exactly the same tactics once used on smokers are being used now in the many theaters of government control, most particularly against those who wisely rejected unethical experimental shots, virtue signalling masks and lock-down compliance. Look no further than the devotion of New Zealand to the idiotic abolition of tobacco.
Recommended reading: "Dissecting Smokers Brains" Michael J McFadden (2003) Aethna Press, DOVER DE19904. ISBN 0-9744979-0-8
I don't need to add the footnote that for those devoted to the COVID-19 narrative, smokers did better than never-smokers. Non-smokers even fared less well.
According to the medical establishment, I will die 10-20 years sooner than others who did not smoke. As such, I will save that many years of state pension. Along the way, I have paid a lot of tobacco tax. Right now in the UK a pack of average quality cigarettes costs around 14 pounds - of which 12 pounds is tax - more if you count that corporation tax. So as a pack a day man, I am paying over 4,000 pounds a year in tobacco taxes and have been for decades. I have not sought any medical treatment arising from smoking. The response to my whinging is always "give it up then" - there ought to be a similar tax on sanctimony,
OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19 death in 17 million patients
Elizabeth J Williamson et al. Nature PMC 2021 June 25.
(Working on behalf of NHS England we created OpenSAFELY: a secure health analytics platform covering 40% of all patients in England, holding patient data within the existing data centre of a major primary care electronic health records vendor. Primary care records of 17,278,392 adults were pseudonymously linked to 10,926 COVID-19 related deaths.)
See notes on: Post-hoc analyses: smoking and hypertension, and see them tie themselves into knots getting around the negligible role smoking plays in "COVID."
I had to laugh about the smoking hype. I grew up around smokers. Smoked myself , and married a smoker. When we all got together there were 12 smokers in one room.. including our poor little children, who were breathing, the secondhand smoke, lol most of the them grew up to smoke. And none of us have ever had cancer! I was born in early 50s. If smoking was so terrible than all of us should on respirators , and or oxygen, and maybe in wheelchairs. What a hoax. I do use nicotine lozenges. I gave up smoking in 2002. I will continue to use my lozenges. My daughter uses nicotine gum, and did the Iron Man , is a triathlete , cycles and runs every weekend.. none of us have taken the shot and none of us ever will. Great article !!!
Back in early 2020, some Italian ad French doctors were recommending wearing nicotine patches to protect against covid. Apparently "current smokers" were less likely to be diagnosed with covid than ex- or non-smokers. When you think about it, nicotine in nose and mouth would probably keep lots of bugs at bay. Actually it's not the tobacco itself that kills you but all the chemicals they spray it with. You can also buy organic tobacco but it costs 2ce as much.
I don't want any of Big Pharma's new upcoming medical cures, period!
If the old ones won't do it, I'll pass.
I'm 67, have smoked since 16, 30-40 cigs a day, artificial hip, which sucks, no other health concerns. I was a drug dealer licensed in 3 states, now I wish I had been a cattleman.
Just over three weeks ago, my 52 year old sister was rushed to hospital with heart issues. Turned out to be a clot. Luckily, it was removed in time. Having worked in a nursing home during "de Covid" she's vaxxed up the wazoo, AZ I think.
Thank you Peter, great post! As a smoker myself I actually have been wondering how does it all stuck up, with the numbers of smokers falling so significantly and all. Funny how the cigarette packs carry the warnings and listing of the nasties and yet (with prohibitive price) we are still able to exercise our choice. Still not as big a money maker as vaxx. Saying that, I rather believe that the whole wonderful gift to humanity (as so many govs interventions) has been from the very beginning about something else, wasn't perhaps conceived as a money spinner.
Certainly is a question of relativity and degree.
The injections started off costing 20 bucks a pop and now are 120 bucks - heavily censored by the bought and paid for media. The costs of treating the side effects are hundreds of times more, but those suffering are not (yet) as many as those injected..
compared to the 4,000 bucks a year in taxes (well in NY and IL etc anyway, not in Ca or MI !) to die 15 years sooner - but with, maybe, more breathing assistance in the last few months of life - and taken care of in a hospice or hospital,
Seems to me that the long term side effects of vaxx injury run to tens of thousands of bucks a year for many years.
Not much analysis of recent estimates of 7& per shot loss in remaining years of life expectancy for the injections - compared to, what 15 years out of 90 years for smokers?
You would have hoped that this sort of analysis on life years lost and quality life years lost would be being done by someone now - but, given there is not even any work being done on increasing rates of autism, Alzheimer's, heart disease and non-smoking cancer, diabetes etc - it seems that paying attention to what is killing peoplle is ot a priority of ANY health organisation at national, state or city level
This experimental stuff from hell should be pulled off the market, but instead they are covering up all the horrible side effects and are pushing the next round of boosters. This is criminal!
criminals gotta criminal!
Nuff said
I hope you can watch this later https://www.youtube.com/live/spGFp1HSSfQ?si=E7_RJjMSYnx7xe_z
Yes, Dr Vaughn is doing the rounds. i wonder what he thinks about ia contention that the S1 part of the spike protein exists in the infection ONLY - whereas the vaxx damage has both the S1 and S2 stem of the spike protein.
As a PhD clinician with post-grad occupational health training, the fallacy of "smoking" in which every disease known, unknown and imaginary was amplified and laid at the medical voodoo altar of tobacco became an inescapably obvious distortion of reality that interfered with understanding, hazard, risk mitigation and prevention in occupational medicine.
Not only that, as a deeply misguided philosophy of control, it served to demonize, ostracize and demean millions in quite a mindless and mistaken manner. Exactly the same tactics once used on smokers are being used now in the many theaters of government control, most particularly against those who wisely rejected unethical experimental shots, virtue signalling masks and lock-down compliance. Look no further than the devotion of New Zealand to the idiotic abolition of tobacco.
Recommended reading: "Dissecting Smokers Brains" Michael J McFadden (2003) Aethna Press, DOVER DE19904. ISBN 0-9744979-0-8
I don't need to add the footnote that for those devoted to the COVID-19 narrative, smokers did better than never-smokers. Non-smokers even fared less well.
According to the medical establishment, I will die 10-20 years sooner than others who did not smoke. As such, I will save that many years of state pension. Along the way, I have paid a lot of tobacco tax. Right now in the UK a pack of average quality cigarettes costs around 14 pounds - of which 12 pounds is tax - more if you count that corporation tax. So as a pack a day man, I am paying over 4,000 pounds a year in tobacco taxes and have been for decades. I have not sought any medical treatment arising from smoking. The response to my whinging is always "give it up then" - there ought to be a similar tax on sanctimony,
OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19 death in 17 million patients
Elizabeth J Williamson et al. Nature PMC 2021 June 25.
(Working on behalf of NHS England we created OpenSAFELY: a secure health analytics platform covering 40% of all patients in England, holding patient data within the existing data centre of a major primary care electronic health records vendor. Primary care records of 17,278,392 adults were pseudonymously linked to 10,926 COVID-19 related deaths.)
See notes on: Post-hoc analyses: smoking and hypertension, and see them tie themselves into knots getting around the negligible role smoking plays in "COVID."
I remember seeing this a while back and forgot to bookmark it. And failed to get back to it so many thanks!
" Risks associated with smoking are unclear"!!
I navigated to full text here:
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32640463
and pdf here:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2521-4.pdf
There is a narrative section: on smoking :
"Post hoc analyses of smoking and hypertension
Both current and former smoking were associated with a higher risk in
models that were adjusted for age and sex only, but in the fully adjusted
model current smoking was associated with a lower risk (fully adjusted
HR 0.89 (0.82–0.97)), which concurs with the lower than expected
prevalence of smoking that was observed in previous studies among
patients with COVID-19 in China10, France11 and the United States19. "
has a sub-section on smoking - you need to scroll down to it in the table
In Data Table 2 there is this.
Under primary analysis of the 10,926 dead
Never smoked - 1.00 (ref) for range?
Current smoker - 0.89 (0.82 - 0.97)
I read that as an 11% lower hazard range.
Thanks again!
I had to laugh about the smoking hype. I grew up around smokers. Smoked myself , and married a smoker. When we all got together there were 12 smokers in one room.. including our poor little children, who were breathing, the secondhand smoke, lol most of the them grew up to smoke. And none of us have ever had cancer! I was born in early 50s. If smoking was so terrible than all of us should on respirators , and or oxygen, and maybe in wheelchairs. What a hoax. I do use nicotine lozenges. I gave up smoking in 2002. I will continue to use my lozenges. My daughter uses nicotine gum, and did the Iron Man , is a triathlete , cycles and runs every weekend.. none of us have taken the shot and none of us ever will. Great article !!!
Thank you for all your hard work. I wish I could financially support you.
You are welcome. Your acknowledgement is support enough!
Back in early 2020, some Italian ad French doctors were recommending wearing nicotine patches to protect against covid. Apparently "current smokers" were less likely to be diagnosed with covid than ex- or non-smokers. When you think about it, nicotine in nose and mouth would probably keep lots of bugs at bay. Actually it's not the tobacco itself that kills you but all the chemicals they spray it with. You can also buy organic tobacco but it costs 2ce as much.
I don't want any of Big Pharma's new upcoming medical cures, period!
If the old ones won't do it, I'll pass.
I'm 67, have smoked since 16, 30-40 cigs a day, artificial hip, which sucks, no other health concerns. I was a drug dealer licensed in 3 states, now I wish I had been a cattleman.
Just over three weeks ago, my 52 year old sister was rushed to hospital with heart issues. Turned out to be a clot. Luckily, it was removed in time. Having worked in a nursing home during "de Covid" she's vaxxed up the wazoo, AZ I think.
Also a smoker, as am I, older and unjabbed.
Guess what they're blaming.
Unfuckingbelievable.
Don't get the show, do not get the shot, not even the "new & improved" shot, no shots at all, do not even test for Covid (like the shot), period!