Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hilary Butler's avatar

I haven't seen too many people spot one glaringly obvious basic error in this study, and if there is this one, that none of the 35 authors or the peer reviewers spotted, what else did they miss?

https://www.facebook.com/anne.pike.121/posts/pfbid02UVZLifD71CTLVuPrEBorU5G7DS3W5M9y3ef573D2JsMD5YPp7wjsepYU6dEg2wrml

Expand full comment
Stephen Feldman's avatar

I only read a few sentences in and this paper looks deliberately constrained. The reality will be FAR WORSE than this:

" AESI (adverse events of special interest) occurring up to 42 days following vaccination with mRNA (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) and adenovirus-vector (ChAdOx1) vaccines were included in the primary analysis"

42 days? So entire lifetimes as a comparable used as a baseline is being compared to just 42 days post vax? How many are ill and don't know it?! How many were only begining to develop sequelae? How many haven't seen their doctor? How many were caught up in the process with no diagnosis yet? In 42 days, you won't capture much - just by design. Looks like a limited hangout operation to me.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts