The clock is ticking – 6 months before amendments to IHR 2005 become binding – only Heads of State can say “No” – US, EU and UK will remain silent – silence = consent

Lots of coverage of the UK parliamentary debate that was forced when more than 100,000 signatures were gathered in a petition. The cynical side of me says “So what now? A full debate in Parliament? A referral to a “Select Committee” that will consider the amendments for 8 months and refer back to a Parliament more interested in blowing billions on climate change crap and bitching at each other, than solving any real problems?”

By the way, I ran across this Executive Summary from the 2019 Annual Report of the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. (I had no idea such a body existed!)

gpmb-2019-execsum-annualreport-en.pdf

Point 4 states: “A rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen (whether naturally emergent or accidentally or deliberately released) poses additional preparedness requirements.”

Talk about prophetic – it looks like foreknowledge!

Check out this 52 minute video that covers all the major points New international health regulations, James Roguski - YouTube  - pause it often, drink lots of coffee and take notes!

57 Amendments were agreed by a working group and will become binding in 6 months.

This will happen regardless of what is in any Pandemic Treaty - or Christmas Tree Framework to hang whatever “decorations” are picked as James Roguski describes it.

For me, the entire process of amendments to IHR 2005 (and any Pandemic Treaty) is just another manifestation of the anti-human cult that dominates policy setting around the world.

The last pandemic had a minor incremental impact on the elderly, poor and infirm with 2-6 co-morbidities (3-5% of the population) – how is that a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)? The definition was wrong, the response was wrong and the injections were wrong.

There is a PHEIC  - a global “pandemic of the vaccinated” which has been totally and wilfully ignored by the WHO and by governments – it is already at least 3 times deadlier and “infecting” three times more people than the 6.9 million C19 deaths and 690 million C19 cases. The deaths and cases were misdiagnosed by at least 90% and the injection harms on adverse event reporting systems are around 40 times under-reported.

So, for those who are interested and can suffer the full extent of the usual “the process is the punishment” tactics employed by anti-humans, here is an entry point for you to pursue as far as you wish to.

From here:

Q&A: International Health Regulations: amendments (who.int)

“The first meeting of the WGIHR was convened on 14-15 November 2022. The WGIHR will propose a package of targeted amendments to the IHR for consideration by the Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly in 2024, in accordance with Article 55 of the IHR. The timeline for the WGIHR was agreed at its second meeting in February 2022.”

“The proposed amendments address the following issues:

·        purpose and scope

·        principles

·        responsible authorities

·        notification

·        verification

·        information sharing

·        risk assessment

·        determination of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern and intermediate level of alert, including temporary recommendations and the convening and functioning of the Emergency Committee

·        public health response, collaboration, and assistance

·        health measures

·        conveyances

·        digitalization of health documents

·        compliance and implementation”

From here: WHO | Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005)

There is a link to this document:

WGIHR_Compilation-en.pdf (who.int)

Article-by-Article Compilation of Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) submitted in accordance with decision WHA75(9) (2022)

WHA75(9) (2022) = Strengthening WHO preparedness for and response to health emergencies

“The compilation is not intended to replace the proposed amendments to the IHR (2005) in the original submission.”

So there is that warning – which I take to mean the following is E&OE by the compiler who may have screwed up or misrepresented the actual amendments, which should be referred to, in order to verify the compilation.

I will just pick out items from the first 3 of 57 amendments that “triggered” me over the 46 page compilation, there are many more covered by James Roguski in the YouTube video link embedded above.

So, here’s your starter for 10.

Article 1 –Definitions - Inserted text “health products” – no mention of natural/herbal/Ayurveda/Asian/African/South American traditional medicines, so this is entirely based on “Western” medicine. Cuts out 80% of the world’s “traditional” medicines. The track record of Western medicines has not covered itself in glory for the last 3 decades. Looks like it’s the “needle and the knife” or nothing.

“include medicines, vaccines, medical devices, diagnostics, assistive products, cell- and gene-based therapies, and other health technologies, but not limited to this course “

Looks like any gene-based treatment is automatically a “therapy” regardless of its adverse impacts and is to be viewed as equivalent to “vaccines”. No doubt the word “modification” was banned, but CRISPR is a cell- and gene-based therapy, regardless of whether it has any track record. It would be better to have the Definitions include some temporal and efficacy/quality terms. We know that injections are lethal.

I wasn’t particularly triggered by deletion of the term “non-binding” on this page, since “advice” remains. Advice is not binding anyway. However, watch the Roguski video to see how this assumption of mine is blown out the water by turning “Advice” into compulsion.

Article 2 – Scope and Readiness – insertion of “including through health systems readiness and resilience in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risk all risks with a potential to impact public health,” – which presumably includes alien invasion, tsunamis, volcanic eruptions, solar flares, rat infestations, extinctions of bees and so on. Quite along piece of string that one!

Article 3 – Principles – deletion of “full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons” and

insertion of “based on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities of the States Parties, taking into consideration their social and economic development.”

Yeah. At this point I am thinking “screw your equity, inclusivity and coherence”. So I stopped.

Remember, a pandemic is a subjective determination by a regional WHO “official” or the Director Genera for any reason. Importantly, itt can be for a POTENTIAL pandemic or public health emergency.

 Sorry to have set you some homework!

Onwards!

Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan  - Buying just one Ko-Fi a week  for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!