The false pandemic and the pandemic of the vaccinated - four phases of "C19"

First a reprise of the first three phases.

Phase 1 – Outbreak, Phase 2 – Injection Roll-out, Phase 3 – Outturn

We know that the RT-PCR test was designed to detect the presence of sequences, not infectiousness. We know that the number of false positives is around 90-95% once the number of amplification cycles used exceeds 30. We know that the average age of those “diagnosed” using the RT-PCR test exceeds average life expectancy by a year or two and that those that succumbed had somewhere between 2 and 6 co-morbidities.

We now know from here that deaths with C19 present were clustered amongst the poor and the sick (though we need to do more analysis on race and gender) and that excess deaths are NOT correlated with age.

Notwithstanding all that, it is worth looking at what the “official” position is – to see what the propaganda is telling us.

Using data for US cases and deaths, Global Cases and Deaths and combining this with US injections and Global injections and then converting the data into numbers per million (adjusting to reflect only those globally that have received at least one dose, we have this table.

These numbers are the changes within each calendar year that correspond to three phases: 2020 – C19 only, 2021 – increasing injection roll-out, 2022 so far – largely a completed initial course.

From that table, the number of “cases” misdiagnosed using the RT-PCR and RAT testing method have increased markedly but the rate of deaths with C19 “present” per case have dropped a lot. Remember that around 10% of the US was diagnosed as a “case” between December 2021 and February 2022 (circa 35 million “cases”).

Those not interested in the underlying data can skip the next tables.

Okay, that’s the “official” view.

Perhaps we can take solace from the substantial decline in the rate of injections over 2022, compared to 2021.

Now for some conspiratorial truth bombs.

First – around only around 5% of those that died with C19 “present” as diagnosed by the RT-PCR/RAT tests, died from C19. Ninety-five per cent of people died from

·        the failure to treat with anti-biotics or continue treatment

·        failure to continue treatment for existing conditions

·        failure to diagnose new, life threatening conditions

·        psychological stress from “non-pharmaceutical interventions” (NPI’s) – e.g neglect and forced isolation/house arrest/deprivation of family support/eradication of self-worth

·        treatment protocols involving Remdesivir, respirators, denial of vitamins/food/water in hospital settings, stipulated by the likes of Fauci, Collins and Birx.

All these deaths were preventable with treatment protocols or removal of NPI’s, but the measures enforced by the FDA/CDC/NIH/NIAID cabal and the WHO, were directly responsible.

Hopefully, a fall in the number of deaths coincides with better treatment over 2022.

Rather than a test of whether C19 was present, autopsies must be performed on those that died (and who were not cremated) to determine the prevalence of Remdesivir (or Midazolam plus morphine for the UK) AND prevalence of spike protein correlated with C19 or vaxx spike proteins.

In previous articles, I showed the tables for leading causes of death and the ages of those that died over the first two phases – 2020 and 2021.

(Note that drug overdoses numbering around 140,000 or so did not make this list, extracted from the CDC web site.)

This conspiracy theory/hypothesis contends that around 40,000 of 766,000 deaths with C19 present were actually from C19 (the new ‘flu). The rest should be allocated across (mostly leading) other causes of death

Here is the two year change in death by age cohort:

We can only wait and watch for the 2022 numbers; I stopped reading this at page 20 of 36.

Secondly, we have discovered that the “vaccine” approval process is so badly flawed that the entire “vaccine” schedule needs to be revisited. We know that the question of deaths and injuries reported to VAERS is substantially understated. We now know that the “vaccine” approval process employed by the FDA/CDC does NOT monitor adverse events over time and that “placebos” used in most “vaccines” are NOT placebos at all, they compare a new “vaccine” with an old “vaccine”. (There are still “vaccines” on the child schedules that contain mercury and aluminium).

The ”vaccine” schedule needs an overhaul (enema) to correlate developing trends in health and death with previous “vaccine” roll-outs over the last five decades (of Fauci’s reign) to restore public trust and public health.

Thirdly, we can estimate the butchers bill of the roll-out of C19 injections – mRNA and viral vector injections. The correlation between excess mortality and its correlation with C19 injections must be completed for each dose and demographic. Of note, Florida Surgeon General Ladapo found no excess mortality overall in Florida, whilst finding excess deaths amongst young men. There is useful information to be had about gender specific efficacy that differentiates suitability by gender. By implication, women receive a benefit If there is no overall excess mortality.

Which brings us to the Fourth Phase – treatment of the vaxx damaged and accurate diagnosis of emerging C19 cases.

Suffice to say, in a worst case scenario, one fifth of the population has already suffered symptomatic adverse events that provide a warning of potential morbid conditions. We need to be able to test for vaxx damage with the same intensity and frequency as we test for C19. We need solutions to the presence of the toxic spike protein In the blood and organs. It goes without saying that the injection roll-out has to be terminated immediately.

Perhaps the people in big pharma can turn their attention to solving this problem instead of creating it.

Maybe the wizards of CRISPr could develop a solution (if they haven’t already). Maybe we can enhance the miracle drug IVM by giving some sort of POSITIVE gain of function.

Perhaps we can program some nanobots to go into the bloodstream (with clear proof of success and extraction of nanobots once complete!) and “search and destroy” the spike proteins – or do some work around an electro-magnetic pulse or 5G signal that destroys or allows “concentration for extraction” of the spike protein.

I personally would need decades of training before I could even attempt a solution – others already have that training. We need a task force to develop solutions in the same way that a C19 task force exists.

In the meanwhile, hospitals need to be re-tooled with the necessary equipment to diagnose and treat as best they can, the massive numbers of incoming vaxx damaged people.