Well, ladies and gentlemen of the Pentagon...get on with it. Stop the bickering and sideswiping. You want war? Let's go to war. I'm not afraid. Are you? Let's go Pentagon and NATO. I've got nothing to lose. I'm calling you out. Let's do it. I will have zero sympathy if the first U.S. land target hit is Washington, D.C.
The YouTube video is very obviously pro Russian, constant use of adjectives to favour Russian position etc. Every hospital blown up is “Ukrainian military “ , no mention of the civilian deaths in Kharkiv, no mention of Russian strategy of targeting civilians in order to depopulate areas. NATO flys over Black Sea collecting data since start of war. Yes, USA with NATO deliver overwatch data and yes, China delivers satellite data to Russia. There is no reason for Americans to crew tbe missile launches. Critical thinking included analyzing motive, plausibility, etc. The claims of “soon we attack Black Sea overwatch” and “Ukrainian terrorist attack beach” are so weak they enter the absurd and even the man speaking them on the video shows embarrassment at saying them.
Go look at the military target that was actually hit right near the beach. Apply critical thinking.
Though not as often and only if I gey updates in my YouTube feed.
Wait for the NATO conference in Washington.
Perhaps the lack of Russian progress is a sign that it has stalled and the tide is turning - certainly increased attacks on Crimea will give the Russians pause.
Momentum and mass seem to be starting work against Russia - a race to man and equip is maybe swinging away from Russia - we will see.
A very plausible analysis is that Russia is willing to burn up a lot of men and equipment to gain land up to the trump win. At that point they expect to keep everything they got. Then, exactly as after Holomodor, the land, women left alive, will be given to Russians. The resources will be plundered to feed the kleptocracy.
On the gritty technology edge, Ukraine is losing unsustainable amounts of men to the glide bombs. USA prohibits missile attacks on the bomber bases. Proper analysis of expected AA missile range, actual effect of data linking (F-16 being fed by overwatch for example and flying in with radar off), is elusive. People are not sharing the AA missile types / capability to be given to Ukraine. No one is sharing up to date intel on Russian AA capability (escort given to bombers will have what radar and missile capability?).
All this leaves is the possibly of giving low level air defense to Ukraine troop concentrations such as Gepard or more modern versions able to hit glide bombs inbound. This will only help.
Last point is, most analysts are surprised Russia was able to hit 4/5 inbound missiles. Usually it’s closer to 1/5. The fact that Ukraine can’t launch cheap MLRS at the same is a factor. Ukraine overall has made tremendous progress on suppression of air defences.
The "leaders" we have are so illegitimate that instead of reconsidering their policies, they would be ok with the West burning down as long as they could rule the ashes.
WW3 here we come, I hope if we have to all die, it's quick. The demons need war to usher in the great reset or one world government with CBDCs and Digital ID. Social credit scores will follow.
Well, ladies and gentlemen of the Pentagon...get on with it. Stop the bickering and sideswiping. You want war? Let's go to war. I'm not afraid. Are you? Let's go Pentagon and NATO. I've got nothing to lose. I'm calling you out. Let's do it. I will have zero sympathy if the first U.S. land target hit is Washington, D.C.
The YouTube video is very obviously pro Russian, constant use of adjectives to favour Russian position etc. Every hospital blown up is “Ukrainian military “ , no mention of the civilian deaths in Kharkiv, no mention of Russian strategy of targeting civilians in order to depopulate areas. NATO flys over Black Sea collecting data since start of war. Yes, USA with NATO deliver overwatch data and yes, China delivers satellite data to Russia. There is no reason for Americans to crew tbe missile launches. Critical thinking included analyzing motive, plausibility, etc. The claims of “soon we attack Black Sea overwatch” and “Ukrainian terrorist attack beach” are so weak they enter the absurd and even the man speaking them on the video shows embarrassment at saying them.
Go look at the military target that was actually hit right near the beach. Apply critical thinking.
There is bias on all sides - truth being the first casualty of war etcc.
I post from this channel as well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYZ01vUYRDI
Though not as often and only if I gey updates in my YouTube feed.
Wait for the NATO conference in Washington.
Perhaps the lack of Russian progress is a sign that it has stalled and the tide is turning - certainly increased attacks on Crimea will give the Russians pause.
Momentum and mass seem to be starting work against Russia - a race to man and equip is maybe swinging away from Russia - we will see.
A very plausible analysis is that Russia is willing to burn up a lot of men and equipment to gain land up to the trump win. At that point they expect to keep everything they got. Then, exactly as after Holomodor, the land, women left alive, will be given to Russians. The resources will be plundered to feed the kleptocracy.
On the gritty technology edge, Ukraine is losing unsustainable amounts of men to the glide bombs. USA prohibits missile attacks on the bomber bases. Proper analysis of expected AA missile range, actual effect of data linking (F-16 being fed by overwatch for example and flying in with radar off), is elusive. People are not sharing the AA missile types / capability to be given to Ukraine. No one is sharing up to date intel on Russian AA capability (escort given to bombers will have what radar and missile capability?).
All this leaves is the possibly of giving low level air defense to Ukraine troop concentrations such as Gepard or more modern versions able to hit glide bombs inbound. This will only help.
Last point is, most analysts are surprised Russia was able to hit 4/5 inbound missiles. Usually it’s closer to 1/5. The fact that Ukraine can’t launch cheap MLRS at the same is a factor. Ukraine overall has made tremendous progress on suppression of air defences.
Yes. Though we are entering a new tactical paradigm of warfare.
Mass productin of autonomous and semi-autonmous weapons.
Could NATO replicate these tactics against all Russian positins in Ukraine?
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/14/iran-attacks-israel-with-over-300-drones-missiles-what-you-need-to-know
How about an army of attack rbots?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_robot
A few hundred - ok, a few hundred thousand?
The "leaders" we have are so illegitimate that instead of reconsidering their policies, they would be ok with the West burning down as long as they could rule the ashes.
I don't like this report at all.
WW3 here we come, I hope if we have to all die, it's quick. The demons need war to usher in the great reset or one world government with CBDCs and Digital ID. Social credit scores will follow.
We are being led into a war by imbeciles