The “spike protein” cannot enter cells – the poisons causing lethal damage are lipids, nanoparticles and the mRNA itself – all this was known BEFORE the injections were rolled out

Sage Hana has returned to a study published in 2022 that challenges the narrative around the toxicity of the spike protein and many other issues. Sage Hana adds other points and references here (unable to cross-post).

"So in nature, there’s no toxic spike protein, it has never been found, never been isolated, never been found in the blood." (substack.com)

The paper in question is here:

"The fact that mRNA 'vaccines' cause cells to (...) - Transition News (transition-news.org)

“Dr Stefano Scoglio is an expert in microbiology and naturopathy, coordinating scientific and clinical research on Klamath algae extracts and probiotics in collaboration with the Italian National Resea”(… rch Centre?),

“There are many take-aways from the 2-year-old interview.

Here is the video:

"The fact that mRNA 'vaccines' cause cells to (...) - Transition News (transition-news.org)

There is no indication of whether the additional testing – for blood sample controls to see if the “tests” for the synthetic spike protein would also test positive for other substances – or whether graphene oxide can be similarly isolated from blood samples – but the key premise is that the SARS-COV2 virus with the “natural” spik protein has bever been shown to exist, despite dozens and dozens of requests from institutions claiming that they have isolated the virus. The claim is “no virus – no spike protein”.

Steve Kirsch’s VSRF weekly program showed an (increasingly antagonistic) Kirsch challenging another “virus denier”, Dr Andrew Kaufman, who did not cite the 2022 paper.

Homepage - Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (vacsafety.org) Episode 131 “Episode 131: The Great Virus Debate! An Interview with Dr. Andrew Kaufman, M.D.”

The discussion ended with both agreeing that n-one should take the “steenking vaccines” (my description).

Of note, there is no reference to recent work by those such as McKernan, Rose and Speicher on the contaminants and adulterations within the injections – though reference was made to metal contaminants that was recently confirmed via some great work by Argentinean researchers on Dr Mihalcea’s web site cross-posted here:

 Analysis Of Covid 19 Injections – 50 Undeclared Chemical Elements, Graphene Oxide, Fluorescent Particles – Conversation With Biotechnologist Lorena Diblasi – Truth, Science and Spirit Ep23 (substack.com)

Recent work supports and challenges Dr Stefano Scoglio’s 2022 content.

Dr Stefano Scoglio states there are five mechanisms that the immune system employs to obliterate the spike protein.

First: As soon as the genic material is injected, it is attacked by specific enzymes called extra-cellular ribonucleases…” … “Pfizer “vaccine” injects 30 micrograms of mRNA, let’s say that about half, 15 micrograms, survive.”

Second, “… often instead of endocytosis the cell produces exocytosis, that is the pouch is used to keep the foreign material outside: Let’s say that half enters and so we now have 7.5 micrograms inside the cell.”

“Third: At this point enters the endosomes/lysosome system: all scientists in the field know that this enzymatic end endocellular system attacks, degrades and eliminate at least 98 percent of any foreign material entering the cells. We are now down to 0.15 micrograms, that 150 nanograms, an infinitesimal quantity.”

Fourth “… the ribonuclease enzymes are also inside the cell, they are called endocellular ribonucleases, and they would dispose very quickly of the minuscule amount of mRNA.”

Fifth, research explain the most important mechanism “… this material is so toxic without needing to introduce any spike protein. They indicate that these “vaccines” are so highly immunogenic.  … “Immunogenic means able to irritate the immune system so much that it reacts very violently. So immunogenic means highly toxic. In fact, they describe the mRNA and synthetic lipids as “self-adjuvants.””

The kicker, citing this study that Pfizer tried to suppress:

Pfizer-bio-distribution-confidential-document-translated-to-english.pdf (naturalnews.com)

“And in this study they found that in the mice into which they injected the material, especially the lipids were found unaltered, unmodified, unchanged. That means, if they had entered the cells, they would’ve been metabolized and you wouldn’t have found them in the same way you have injected them. That means they have not entered into any cell, but they diffused in all organs of the body, and particularly liver, spleen, female ovary and kidneys.”

Not into cells – into organs.

There are many more points – but the key one for me was the failure to isolate the virus AND the spike protein. I am unclear as to differences between the “natural” infection and the “unnatural” injection – but that confusion is based on the premise that the virus and spike protein exist. The spike protein has not been isolated in the body and blood of a patient, neither has the virus. The contention is that it is the lipids and nanoparticles that cause the damage and are dispersed, not the spike protein.

Tests for antibodies are NOT specific to the spike protein (and non-existent virus?) but would react in such a way as to generate a positive result from other substances – like metal contaminants etc.

There is no mention of non-metal contaminants and adulterations within the “vaccines”, or the monkey virus insert of partial SV30, or endotoxins/bacteria etc that were revealed a year after the interview.

Nor is there any mention of cures for the lipid, nan-particle and mRNA poisoning. The analysis contends that targeting the spike protein is an exercise in futility.

To emphasise, here’s a couple of quotes from the interview:

 “t’s so highly toxic that as soon as you inject it the immune system attacks it and then it explodes into millions of nanoparticles in the body.”

“Instead, they take the material with the immunoglobulins, they put it in touch with the synthetic spike protein. And it reacts because it reacts to any toxin, so it’ll react also to the synthetic spike protein. And then they say: “Ah, that means there are specific antibodies for the spike protein. That means the body’s full of spike protein.” But it’s a fraud.”

See what you think.

Onwards!!!

Please take a paid subscription or forward this article to those you think might be interested. You can also donate via Ko-fi – any amount from three dollars upwards. Ko-fi donations here:    https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan