The “spike protein” cannot enter cells – the poisons causing lethal damage are lipids, nanoparticles and the mRNA itself – all this was known BEFORE the injections were rolled out
The “spike protein” cannot enter cells – the poisons causing lethal damage are lipids, nanoparticles and the mRNA itself – all this was known BEFORE the injections were rolled out
We’ve been reading about “anti-virus” a lot. But… do we bother to listen to the people classified into this category?
They emphasize time and again they they are not “anti”.
All their efforts are aimed at making the “virus believers” to show evidence of the virus, or any virus. And they do not have some fancy requirements. They say, following [your own] scientific rules, show the scientific evidence of the virus and its functioning.
Which, in effect, does not make them any opposition to anything. They are merely pressing on following the rules set up by the (mainstream) scientific communities. In a weird sense, they are the most scientific folks of all - not denying anything, but calling for sincerity to the science as it is being presented to the public.
Here's the problem with this argument, though. You would need to look at not only placebo forms of the mRNA shot that contain everything except the mRNA and see if you get the same rates of myocarditis, clotting, etc. but also all other shots that also contain graphene, etc. Graphene is used as an image enhancer for MRIs, for instance. Do those folks get myocarditis?
This article seems more like a distraction / capture by people whose goal is to get people to look past the mRNA technology - buy into that being "super cool and effective" - and blame all of the effects on the delivery mechanism. Why? So you will go along with letting them add this crap to food and other ways of "safely" getting it into your system.
People, we have to understand that there are numerous psyops running right now, each one targeting a different objection people have to being experimented on. It's like fishing. They keep trying different bait to hook you. It is sophisticated, devious and not-at-all obvious when being employed against you.
Is that absolutely what is going on in this article? No idea. But ask yourself this after each one of these stories: Did it make you feel different about some part of the whole experiment we all just went though? Which part? Why might that be? What might be the upshot of dropping one part of your defenses or giving one part of the story more blame than another?
Weissman and Kariko earned the Nobel Prize for modifying RNA to enable the LNP to sneak past the body's sentry guards and get into cells. But isn't the modRNA inside the LNPs? The RNA would instruct cells to make the computer version of spike protein, not the alleged real virus one because no one has ever managed to get a full sample from any patient, unlike a bacterial sample, which I find incredible. Tom Cowan says, even if they had 1,000 samples from different people, they'd still not be able to get a complete virus! So, this applies to all viruses also. The LNPs are very toxic and volatile, explained well by another Italian in this video link. The fact, as stated in the documents shown, not to used on humans and animals, nor used in injections, is clearly warned, yet totally overlooked by all so called regulators, which is unbelievable! vimeo.com/807279310
Covid19 spike S protein is a homologue of Syncytin-proteins which are essential for the formation of the placenta. The syncytia protein is elementary to create a host, the virus spike S piggybacks on this existing biochemical reproduction.
Autopsies on Covid19 deaths found only viral RNA in the lung, but nothing in the affected organs. The plausible cause is that covid19’s S spike is the single item that destroys the organ. It is of this spike protein S which genetic formula had been patented and used in the alleged vaccines.
Whereas the virus has neither been photographed nor been isolated; one could wonder about the nature of the covid-19 virus (size 1.25 µm); whether it includes a similar enigma as that of an electron; which implies that it can move between matter and light. Experiments on electrons have shown that its behaviour can be influenced by the observer. Quantum theorists have demonstrated that how a particle behaves and shows itself; depend on the observer’s concepts.
Rupert Sheldrake demonstrated by many experiments that morphogenetic resonance influences animals, plants, microbes and infectious agents; and that even ‘dead’ objects behave according to the power of habits. Formulas for to calculate the behaviour of dead objects always includes a Constance; about which traditional science teaches that it is always the same (dead). Yet repetitive experiments on manmade substances causes this Constance to change: the experimenter influences its object.
Experts in gain-to-function experiments can teach zoonoses 'viruses', by repetitive inoculation, to adapt themselves to humans; as it has likely been done in biolabs
My husband has over 50 yrs research as virologist/immunologist, worked at Public Health Dept. in PA advising govt/public/doctors etc. on how to manage epidemics, disease, etc. and did lots of research. When covid first came out it was called coronavirus and he said he worked with it in 1970s. It is a form of the common cold. This is in Merck Manual of medicine, which is used worldwide by virologists, doctors etc. It doesn't kill anyone except for the very, very old and those with compromised immune systems. Hope this helps.
I am not sure if you are saying viruses in general don't exist or this specific doesn't exist or the spike protein of this specific virus doesn't exist.
See my response just above, this may help to clarify. Covid/coronavirus is very hard on the lungs but doesn't kill unless you're very old or have compromised immune systems. My comment above will explain more.
Dr Stefano Scoglio is saying that SARS-COV2 has never been isolated and shown to exist and hence the spik protein attached to it does not exist either. He cites replies to dozens of FOIA's that ask for the virus - all of which came back with "we have no evidence to show you".
Dr Kaufman is a "virus denier".- there are many on that side and even more on th other side..
I am not an expert and so have no strong views on whether there are 380 TRILLION viruses in each of us or not.
One of th pro or anyi-virus camps will one day be conclusively proven right. Right now, the pr-virus side runs politics.
The more fundamental question is "does the spike protein in the infection or the injection - as delivered by natural r unnatural lipids - cause less damage than the unnatural lipids, and the modified mRNA/viral vector injections, nanoparticles, or the contaminants/adulterations etc.
No-one knows right now, because the EXPERIMENT in mRNA tch is on-going.
On top of that they are developing airborne inoculations to counteract/go along with airborne transmission of pathogens like the SARS-COV2 spike protein - self-replicating and evolving using "snipped off tails of "viruses" - like cloud seeding but "raining" on people .- already approved for use in Japan.
It is hard to demonstrate a mechanism of harm from the spike protein or the cntaminants - so it is even harder to come up with a mechanism of actin to trat each harm caused by each component of the ingrediaents of the injectins.
We’ve been reading about “anti-virus” a lot. But… do we bother to listen to the people classified into this category?
They emphasize time and again they they are not “anti”.
All their efforts are aimed at making the “virus believers” to show evidence of the virus, or any virus. And they do not have some fancy requirements. They say, following [your own] scientific rules, show the scientific evidence of the virus and its functioning.
Which, in effect, does not make them any opposition to anything. They are merely pressing on following the rules set up by the (mainstream) scientific communities. In a weird sense, they are the most scientific folks of all - not denying anything, but calling for sincerity to the science as it is being presented to the public.
Here's the problem with this argument, though. You would need to look at not only placebo forms of the mRNA shot that contain everything except the mRNA and see if you get the same rates of myocarditis, clotting, etc. but also all other shots that also contain graphene, etc. Graphene is used as an image enhancer for MRIs, for instance. Do those folks get myocarditis?
This article seems more like a distraction / capture by people whose goal is to get people to look past the mRNA technology - buy into that being "super cool and effective" - and blame all of the effects on the delivery mechanism. Why? So you will go along with letting them add this crap to food and other ways of "safely" getting it into your system.
People, we have to understand that there are numerous psyops running right now, each one targeting a different objection people have to being experimented on. It's like fishing. They keep trying different bait to hook you. It is sophisticated, devious and not-at-all obvious when being employed against you.
Is that absolutely what is going on in this article? No idea. But ask yourself this after each one of these stories: Did it make you feel different about some part of the whole experiment we all just went though? Which part? Why might that be? What might be the upshot of dropping one part of your defenses or giving one part of the story more blame than another?
Weissman and Kariko earned the Nobel Prize for modifying RNA to enable the LNP to sneak past the body's sentry guards and get into cells. But isn't the modRNA inside the LNPs? The RNA would instruct cells to make the computer version of spike protein, not the alleged real virus one because no one has ever managed to get a full sample from any patient, unlike a bacterial sample, which I find incredible. Tom Cowan says, even if they had 1,000 samples from different people, they'd still not be able to get a complete virus! So, this applies to all viruses also. The LNPs are very toxic and volatile, explained well by another Italian in this video link. The fact, as stated in the documents shown, not to used on humans and animals, nor used in injections, is clearly warned, yet totally overlooked by all so called regulators, which is unbelievable! vimeo.com/807279310
Covid19 spike S protein is a homologue of Syncytin-proteins which are essential for the formation of the placenta. The syncytia protein is elementary to create a host, the virus spike S piggybacks on this existing biochemical reproduction.
Autopsies on Covid19 deaths found only viral RNA in the lung, but nothing in the affected organs. The plausible cause is that covid19’s S spike is the single item that destroys the organ. It is of this spike protein S which genetic formula had been patented and used in the alleged vaccines.
Whereas the virus has neither been photographed nor been isolated; one could wonder about the nature of the covid-19 virus (size 1.25 µm); whether it includes a similar enigma as that of an electron; which implies that it can move between matter and light. Experiments on electrons have shown that its behaviour can be influenced by the observer. Quantum theorists have demonstrated that how a particle behaves and shows itself; depend on the observer’s concepts.
Rupert Sheldrake demonstrated by many experiments that morphogenetic resonance influences animals, plants, microbes and infectious agents; and that even ‘dead’ objects behave according to the power of habits. Formulas for to calculate the behaviour of dead objects always includes a Constance; about which traditional science teaches that it is always the same (dead). Yet repetitive experiments on manmade substances causes this Constance to change: the experimenter influences its object.
Experts in gain-to-function experiments can teach zoonoses 'viruses', by repetitive inoculation, to adapt themselves to humans; as it has likely been done in biolabs
My husband has over 50 yrs research as virologist/immunologist, worked at Public Health Dept. in PA advising govt/public/doctors etc. on how to manage epidemics, disease, etc. and did lots of research. When covid first came out it was called coronavirus and he said he worked with it in 1970s. It is a form of the common cold. This is in Merck Manual of medicine, which is used worldwide by virologists, doctors etc. It doesn't kill anyone except for the very, very old and those with compromised immune systems. Hope this helps.
I am not sure if you are saying viruses in general don't exist or this specific doesn't exist or the spike protein of this specific virus doesn't exist.
See my response just above, this may help to clarify. Covid/coronavirus is very hard on the lungs but doesn't kill unless you're very old or have compromised immune systems. My comment above will explain more.
Much appreciated. I had grasped that - probably from your summary. I'm struggling to understand what level of virus denial the author is at though.
Dr Stefano Scoglio is saying that SARS-COV2 has never been isolated and shown to exist and hence the spik protein attached to it does not exist either. He cites replies to dozens of FOIA's that ask for the virus - all of which came back with "we have no evidence to show you".
Dr Kaufman is a "virus denier".- there are many on that side and even more on th other side..
I am not an expert and so have no strong views on whether there are 380 TRILLION viruses in each of us or not.
https://theconversation.com/meet-the-trillions-of-viruses-that-make-up-your-virome-104105
Here's a link to another "anti-virus" advocate, Dr Sam Bailey.
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/viruses-dont-exist-and-why-it-matters/#
One of th pro or anyi-virus camps will one day be conclusively proven right. Right now, the pr-virus side runs politics.
The more fundamental question is "does the spike protein in the infection or the injection - as delivered by natural r unnatural lipids - cause less damage than the unnatural lipids, and the modified mRNA/viral vector injections, nanoparticles, or the contaminants/adulterations etc.
No-one knows right now, because the EXPERIMENT in mRNA tch is on-going.
On top of that they are developing airborne inoculations to counteract/go along with airborne transmission of pathogens like the SARS-COV2 spike protein - self-replicating and evolving using "snipped off tails of "viruses" - like cloud seeding but "raining" on people .- already approved for use in Japan.
It is hard to demonstrate a mechanism of harm from the spike protein or the cntaminants - so it is even harder to come up with a mechanism of actin to trat each harm caused by each component of the ingrediaents of the injectins.