Share this discussion
The Thai Royal Family is told that the Princess is a victim of C19 mRNA injection and advisers to the Government recommend declaring injection contracts “null and void”
peterhalligan.substack.com
|
15 Comments
© 2024 Peter Halligan
Substack is the home for great culture
MUST WATCH - Dr. Thomas Cowan Explains it all https://www.bitchute.com/video/6TgUxtmjUSBs/
Lucky this didn't happen!
https://sites.suffolk.edu/xenia/2016/02/17/nikola-tesla-and-his-work-in-wireless-energy-and-power-transfer/
Interesting and disturbing. I suspect that it is not a high priority amongst scientists to examine in any depth - the impact of electricity, microwaves or even solar radiation on health would prove anathema to the 99% of the planet that relies on the infrastructure that supports the internet.
No doubt you will keep us up to date with the legal proceedings
If they are reported on the web! Note that updates murder charges against Swaminathan of the WHO and Gates et al by the Indian Bar Association are few and far between
very seldom are the very wealthy found guilty. So G Maxwell procured the girls...........that is only a crime if the girls were used/abused.............so unless she used/abused ,someone else must have done so.
Yes. So far only Gates, Prince Andrew and Clinton have attracted a lot of attention to Epstein's island - Trump, Dershowitz a little too. Were there 100's of others throughout the world who visited multiple times? Who has the passenger lists for the ten years prior?
Indeed -passenger lists and activities.
Only the messenger got caught.
Thanks for this post.
You are welcome.
https://rumble.com/v27hvzx-k-o-n-k-r-e-t-discussion-with-prof.-dr.-sucharit-bhakdi-news-from-the-royal.html
Pascal Nadjadihas filed at the police documents containing criminal charges against the president and former health minister of Switzerland. He is not prosecuting him; he leaves that to the 'prosecutor' and the judges. If they don't take it; then the Swiss justice system is disfunktional. So far, it has been moved to the higher Courts.
Yet whether it will be heard, and the president be sentenced is another thing.
Something similar is going on in Thailand by their royals; this time against Pfizer for committing fraud.
The former was also attempted in the UK, Germany and in many other countries; yet their Courts blocked it.
In the USA, in some of its states it is on the table. Every country can file a claim against Pfizer as it is based in the USA.
What Bhakdi (a Thai) is proving is that prior to the roll out; Pfizer had no clinical safety studies and no proof that it stopped transmission; and pfizer knew that its product was toxic
Regulators knew about this and yet ...promoted (forced) it to the public; it being safe and effective.
A. Latypova (medicine researcher) explains that in the USA and elsewhere, new judicial systems were set up to enable the 'legalisation' of vaccines without any clinical trials, raw data and overview of their trails; She states that this also occurred in the UK by MHRA and Matt Hancock.
Moreover the 'vaccine rollout' was a military operation under 'military (non civic) rules.
This might explain why the Court wouldn't touch it; it should be done under marshal Court.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/latypova-wodarg-deconstruct-ongoing-fifth-generation-warfare-directed-citizens-globally/5806844
This lady tells a lot; one might have to listen twice
Yes, thanks for this. I follow Sasha closely - and her online brawl with Karen Kingston.
Cases need to be brought in front of a court in order to determine guilt or innocence. Not all countries follow laws set down in the US and UK - though, notably, there is a precedent for courts in the British Commonwealth to each adopt another country's decision.
It is interesting that the determination of a "State of Emergency" varies state by state in the US and does not need to follow SOE at the Federal Level - case in point California will lift its SOE in the next few weeks - v Biden's declared end date of May 11th.
There is the issue of quality. In order to prosecute someone who made the toxins, that someone else "finished" by dethawing, and administered into the correct muscle or incorrect vein, - the bottom line is that everyone involved was guilty of experimental treatment with a product that failed clinical trials and was known - as soon as the post-marketing authorization was complete - end February 2021 - to cause unacceptable levels of deaths and injuries.
Whatever may be said about the law being an ass - it has stood the test of time for preventing unjust treatment of one human being by another - courts exist to prevent violence - period.
So, a few ounces of quality - within the bounds of evolved legal precedent - supersede harmful laws passed by politicians (for the UK, US and Commonwealth) - but can be prosecuted in countries that have evolved their own legal systems - like Thailand or Argentina or Nigeria.
This case was lodged with the ICC over a year ago and has a useful template - was it coincidence that the UK was among the first to relax all C19 measures? Who (WHO?) knows.
https://hannahroselaw.co.uk/icc-complaint-uk/
Yet, this too is not reported in the media most consume.
Arrrrrrgh!
Dump the Vax !