UK Parliament to debate excess deaths suffered over the last four years - on 20th October 2023

Andrew Bridgen has, finally, been successful in securing a debate on the rise In excess deaths to persistently high levels despite the ending of the pandemic.

He released this tweet:

(14) Andrew Bridgen on X: "Important news , at last we have a date for a debate in Parliament on Excess Deaths. @thereclaimparty https://t.co/3v3NgnYHDu" / X (twitter.com)

And Expose-news.com has covered the announcement in depth here:

“Important News, at Last, We Have a Date for a Debate in Parliament on Excess Deaths.” – Andrew Bridgen – The Expose (expose-news.com)

There is a chance for UK politicians to apply all the quality and expertise they possess to identify the causes of the hundreds of thousands of extra deaths in the UK since the outset of the pandemic.

Don’t expect that there will be any denial of a pandemic at all, or that definitions of adjusted data that reflect deaths “with ONLY C19 present” and “deaths with C19 present”, or the issue of Midazolam + morphine to be cited, or the denial of alternative treatments such as IVM and HCQ (or Chlorine Dioxide) protocols to be raised. No debate will occur around “Informed Consent” or DNR notices issued with no direct or family consent.

There may be some debate around “failure to diagnose” emerging health conditions, but there won’t be much around “failure to continue to treat” existing conditions or the scale of the damage done.

Nor will the issue of poor manufacturing quality of experimental injections with no infrastructure to check quality of compliance and conformance and the resulting deadly contaminants injected into arms. Neither will the issue be of under reporting to the “Yellow Card” system or the failure to react to clear signals from it – before and after adjusting for under reporting.

Neither will (deep breath!!) clear evidence from US clinical trials of more harm than good – including more deaths AND evidence of harms from the first ten weeks to 28 February 2021 of US post marketing authorization reports released in April 2021. (1,223 deaths amongst 42,000 or so reported events from around 70 million doses administered – compared to the 126 million doses shipped and presented in the Pfizer post marketing authorization report from Pfizer – those numbers from the US and do not include Moderna or Janssen or AstraZeneca).

Speaking of Astra Zeneca, there will be no discussion of why it was pulled from the UK after exhibiting especially lethal outcomes after billions of pounds of tax payer investment.

Anyway, aside from that – which ALL MP’s should have made themselves familiar with and the vast majority haven’t, let’s move on.

There will not be any discussion of the acceleration towards death of those injected or compensation for those suffering severe (life altering) or serious (life threatening) events. Indications are that life years lost = 7% times years life expectancy times number of shots.

Keep in mind that the Speaker will invite a number of members of parliament to speak. There are 650 of them with perhaps a dozen who are very interested and the rest not even aware of the size of the issue.

Parliamentary debates last between 3 and 5 hours.

A debate implies two sides presenting their views. I am not sure what the outcome will be, perhaps a Royal Commission of Enquiry, but here are some rough numbers around format for PARTISAN debates – this one should not be partisan. Both the ruling Tory and opposition Labour parties have displayed zero interest In even talking about thousands of extra Brits dying every week = tens of thousands a year.

So the debate will borrow from this sort of format.

20 minutes of preparation time for both teams

7 minutes for the Prime Minister Constructive (PMC), who supports the motion

8 minutes for the Leader of Opposition Constructive (LOC), who opposes the motion

8 minutes for the Member of Government Constructive (MG), who extends the government case

8 minutes for the Member of Opposition Constructive (MO), who extends the opposition case

Here’s a link to Wiki about Royal Commissions: Royal commission - Wikipedia

Just to give you some idea of what the truth is up against, check out the closing paragraphs from this article from the communist state tv -the BBC, from 10 January 2023 and recall all the fate of every journalist that has spoken out:

Excess deaths in 2022 among worst in 50 years - BBC News

“Finally, figures up to June 2022 looking at deaths from all causes show unvaccinated people were more likely to die than vaccinated people.

While this data on its own can't tell us it's the vaccine protecting people from dying - there are too many complicating factors - if vaccines were driving excess deaths we would expect this to be the other way around.”

You may not have this ad displayed if you were to click the link – you will have your ads probably tailored to your internet use, but I have this one and “isn’t it ironic”.

YCMTSU!

Joel Smalley (DeadManTalking) has been doing sterling work on drilling into the elimination of distortions in the way that excess deaths are calculated. Check out the hoops that have to be jumped through to get to accurate numbers here:

(100) Methodology for Estimating Excess Mortality #2 (substack.com)

Onwards!

Please buy a subscription or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 coffee a week!