Have Millions been killed by the mRNA Injections ? Or is it just Coincidence?
No Statistics -- Just DATA -- You decide
Introduction: In a draft of my Ph.D. Physics thesis, I had written:
“These data obviously show …”1 (Those Data DID, I’m sure! Whatever they were.)
Bob Pollock, IUCF Laboratory Director, my thesis advisor, crossed those most-beautiful words out, and scribbled in: “Just show the data; let the reader decide”.
So, below are raw data from official government agencies from four countries for the CoVid-Injection-Rates, and Death or All-Cause-Mortality Rates. The solid curves are the 4 week running averages. No Statistics, no Analysis, and no Conclusions. And these aren’t my Data — I have no skin in the game. Think what you will.
Germany
Canada
U.K.2
U.S.3
Discussion
I “see” a surge in Deaths lagging each surge in Injections by about a month or two for the past almost 2 years. What do you “see”?
If one were to conjecture that this Correlation is not Coincidence, but rather Causation, then one might also conjecture that these Injections have caused the death of at least 1 Million Americans and 20 Million others around the world.
Perhaps if there were anything else indicating the lethality of these Injections? Perhaps the VAERS System?
Philosophical question: can Data (i.e., numbers coming from verifiable measurements, not from models) disprove a Narrative? E.g., didn’t Galileo’s observations of the moons orbiting Jupiter merely confirm the Earth-Centric-Epicycle model and that it just needed a few more refinements (Tweaks)? One could create an infinite number of models to explain these data. This is where one might invoke Occam’s Razor. But perhaps Occam’s Razor only confirms that Physicists tend towards the simplest solution due to their inherent laziness. But perhaps there is something to be said for Simplicity. In Wm. Blake’s words:
“How wide the Gap, Impassible, between Simplicity, and Insipidity?”
We BELIEVE all sorts of things, usually told to us by Authorities. But can we really KNOW anything?
Note: The U.K. Mortality Data is pitifully “noisy”, to the point of being suspect; consequently I show only one plot for the largest surge in Injections. I removed a single obvious outlier in the Mortality Data that deviated by 17 Standard Deviations from the remaining data with respect to its neighbors! That was a first for me. The probability of a point being even just 7 Standard Deviations away is less than 1 part in a billion and I don’t think that even I could even calculate the probability of 17 Standard Deviations! Please excuse this necessary “Statistic”. In the future I may write a whole posting about “Statistics”.
It is interesting to compare the smoothness, or lack of noise, in the U.S. Mortality Data from the CDC, compared with the U.K. Mortality data from the ONS. One might conjecture all sorts of things.