There is a mountain of scientific evidence that supports the case for “Climate Normality” – compared to a molehill of political propaganda that fails to support the case for a “Climate Emergency”.
Here are some quick links to browse at your leisure to refresh your memory or introduce you to the global scam being perpetrated by virtue signalling politicians who, in turn, act as sycophants to a tiny cabal of”faux scientists” on the UN’s organ, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Let’s start with how facts are distorted – in the US and at the IPCC:
A couple of short videos in this piece will set the scene for the propaganda:
Climate change is CYCLICAL, yet the IPCC represents it as linear in its modelling.
Much of the “climate emergency” propaganda is based on an 8,000 year low point in global temperatures in the late 1800’s.
Real climate scientists point out errors in measurement (choosing heat islands, rather than rural locations) whilst simply ignoring the most significant greenhouse gas – water vapour/clouds.
(link to a full video presentation of a slide deck here:
Dr. Willie Soon's February 2023 presentation at ICCC15, Florida (USA) (ceres-science.com)
The UN IPCC has a bunch (7?) climate models – none of which can replicate the past, let alone the future – the closest is the Russian model.
There is a model that does work, but is ignored.
That last link has this statement “Methane (CH4) and CO2 don’t matter.”
The emphasis of the debate has shifted a little – to “preserving wetlands” by eliminating nitrous oxide (N2O) and similar nitrogen bases pollutants. The Dutch and Irish believe that slaughtering significant portions of their herds is good for the climate. People starving to death elsewhere from the knock on effect of reductions in global food supply are not important. The Dutch government believes in the power of the jackboot to enforce their “wrong think”.
Dutch government declares a state of emergency to stop farmer protest – The Expose (expose-news.com)
Here is an article from “American Thinker” that puts that notion of the risks from N2O to bed.
Climate Alarmist War On Nitrous Oxide Threatens The Global Food Supply - American Thinker
It summarizes a piece by C.A. de Lange, a physicist at Vrije Universiteit, in Amsterdam; J.D. Ferguson, an M.D. at the University of Pennsylvania, with a specialty in developing computer models of the effect of nitrogen fertilizers on dairy farming; William Happer, emeritus professor of physics at Princeton; and W.A. van Wijngaarden, a professor of physics at York University in.
Not exactly lightweights in the field! Here is a link to their report, published in November 2022.
Nitrous-Oxide.pdf (co2coalition.org)
“All four are staunch critics of the IPCC war to expand the hysterical climate attack on carbon dioxide (CO2) to include demonizing nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4), which are classed as “minor greenhouse gases.”
The report concludes with a compelling truth: “It is not possible to maintain highly productive agriculture without nitrogen fertilizer.” It’s a genuinely frightening thought that the neo-Marxists at the heart of today’s climate hysteria have chosen to attack N2O because millions will die if governments ban nitrogen fertilizers.
The neo-Marxist ideologues are willing to manipulate existential climate fear in their insane willingness to kill millions if that’s what is required to negate capitalism.”
I have been bookmarking links for quite a while, here’s a few more, but these should be sufficient to obliterate the “faux science” of the IPCC and expose its bought and paid for propaganda for the political mechanism to bilk tax payers of their opportunities to “live long and prosper” by the Marxist/Maoist Cult of Moloch that infests almost all governments around the world.
The objective of the Cult is the reduction of at least half of the world’s human population to “sustainable levels”. Of course the Cult is seeking to promote dexades of kinetic “food wars”.
Luckily these killers of the elderly, the infirm, the weak, the poor and babies do NOT hold sway over the other 8 billion people on the planet that want to live.
There are ideas like this that smart people are checking out:
“We report a solid-state faradaic electro-swing reactive adsorption system comprising an electrochemical cell that exploits the reductive addition of CO2 to quinones for carbon capture. The reported device is compact and flexible, obviates the need for ancillary equipment, and eliminates the parasitic energy losses by using electrochemically activated redox carriers. “
Remember Jon Oliver’s skit belittling “climate deniers” because he had found “11,000” concerned scientists?
Who are these '11,000 Concerned Scientists'? - American Thinker
Check this out – you may need to bypass a few security settings:
Global Warming Petition Project
31,500 American scientists – including more than 9,000 PhD’s sit on the other side.
We live in a world of scarce resources. The diversion of the natural evolution of science and research to suit political goals of a demonic cult is an exercise in cruel futility.
Taxation is theft and so is borrowing with no intention of repayment. Big government and unelected bureaucrats steal with impunity – impoverishing generations whilst hiding behind a desk and a nice fat pension for a crime well committed.
Bonus clip - temperature records start at a 6,000 year LOW in global temperatures:
Never forget this clip – temperature records on which “global warming” or “global boiling” claims are based, start in 1875 – at an 8,000 year low in global temperatures.
The BEST Climate Clip I've EVER seen - What do you think?? #SCIENCE - YouTube
Onwards
Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan Buying just one Ko-Fi a week for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!
Peter Peter Peter. Your serendipitous synchronicity is almost frightening. I am talking about your impeccable timing, of course. I say this because tomorrow morning I will be publishing my extensive post on this subject which is an interview with Canadian energy expert Allan MacRae.
I have just inserted a few of the fine examples you have listed in this post and your other one as well to complement my piece. I have also now linked to both of your posts. So, have a look tomorrow morning (the 12th) by around 10 am as it should be up by then.
Cheers,
Good job!